Skip to content

Stair Climbing Exercise Versus Traditional Resistance Exercise

An Individualized Stair Climbing Program Versus Traditional Resistance Exercise: Effects on Strength, Power, Functional Performance and Cognition in Older Adults

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05263115
Enrollment
46
Registered
2022-03-02
Start date
2022-02-11
Completion date
2022-07-30
Last updated
2023-01-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Exercise Training

Brief summary

Current evidence suggests resistance exercise as the primary therapeutic strategy to prevent age-related functional decline. The National Strength and Conditioning Association recently stated that a properly designed resistance exercise program should include power exercises performed at higher velocities in concentric movements with moderate intensities. We should be aware that not all older adults are easily motivated to train in unfamiliar gym-based settings with high subscription fees. Therefore, implementation of traditional gym-based resistance exercise at a large scale has been found to be difficult. Interestingly, we have previously shown that the use of high external loads, which implies the need for specific facility memberships, is not necessary to induce neuromuscular gains. This provides strong support for home-based training intervention strategies. Stair climbing or stepping-based exercise constitute a promising avenue to ameliorate the cost-effectiveness and implementation potential of resistance exercise in older adults. Such exercises can induce muscular activation levels similar to high-load resistance exercise and result in similar or even better gains in muscle mass, strength and power compared to slow-speed resistance exercise when properly designed. However, the (neuro)-muscular effects of stair climbing exercise have never been compared to the more optimal power-oriented resistance exercise, which is the primary aim of this study. The secondary aim of this study is to examine if stair climbing exercise also has beneficial effects on cognition.

Interventions

12-week progressive resistance exercise intervention

OTHERFunctional stair climbing and stepping-based exercise intervention

12-week progressive stair climbing and stepping-based exercise intervention

Sponsors

KU Leuven
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
65 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

\-

Exclusion criteria

* Unstable cardiovascular disease * Neurological disorders * Cognitive malfunctioning (MoCA \< 24) * Low level of physical function (SPPB \< 7) * Acute infections/fever * Severe musculoskeletal problems * Systematic engagement in (resistance) exercise in the 12 months prior to participation

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
F-V profileChange from baseline in F-v profile at 12 weeksForce-velocity profiling is carried out unilaterally (dominant leg) on the pneumatic leg press device (Leg Press CC, HUR, Kokkola, Finland). The test protocol consists of a maximal isometric test (knee joint angle = 85°, hip angle = 55°; 3 attempts of 3s), followed by explosive concentric leg extensions at gradually increasing loads (unloaded, 15%, 30%, 45%, 60%, 75% of the maximal isometric force, 2-3 attempts per load, and additional single repetitions until one-repetition maximum is reached). Mean velocity of the best trial per load is used to estimate the individual F-v relationship through a linear equation. This F-v relationship will be used to examine the exercise-induced adaptations. F0 (maximal force), v0 (maximal velocity), a (the equation's slope), Pmax (maximal power) and the corresponding v and F at Pmax are used for the analyses.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
5-repetition sit-to-stand timeChange from baseline in sit-to-stand performance at 12 weeksThe time (s) needed to perform 5 sit-to-stand transitions.
5-repetition sit-to-stand powerChange from baseline in sit-to-stand performance at 12 weeksThe power (watt) needed to perform 5 sit-to-stand transitions.
Stair ascent timeChange from baseline in stair climbing performance at 12 weeks.The time (s) needed to ascend a flight of stairs.
Stair ascent powerChange from baseline in stair climbing performance at 12 weeks.The power (watt) needed to ascend a flight of stairs.
Gait speedChange from baseline in gait speed at 12 weeksThe average speed to walk 10m as fast as possible (in m/s)
MoCA test scoreChange from baseline in Montrial Cognitive Assessment test score at 12 weeks.Total score (min 0, max 30, higher scores indicate better performance) on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment test
Digit Span Test scoreChange from baseline in Digit Span Test score at 12 weeks.Total score (min 0, max 30, higher scores indicate better performance) on the Digit Span Test
Trail Making Test TimeChange from baseline in Trail Making Test at 12 weeks.Total duration (s) needed to complete the Trail Making Test.
Stroop Test number of wordsChange from baseline in Stroop Test at 12 weeks.Total number of words red in 45s in the stroop test.
Countermovement jump heightChange from baseline in countermovement jump height at 12 weeks.Jump height (cm) in a countermovement jump

Countries

Belgium

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026