Skip to content

Comparison of Single Port and Two Ports Robotic Assisted Thoracic Surgery for Thymectomy

Randomized Open Label Two Arms Cohort Study to Evaluate Curative Effect and Quality of Life of Single Port and Two Ports Robotic Assisted Thoracic Surgery for Thymectomy

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05262582
Acronym
RATS
Enrollment
60
Registered
2022-03-02
Start date
2022-05-10
Completion date
2025-01-01
Last updated
2022-05-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Myasthenia Gravis Associated With Thymoma, Thymectomy, Thymoma

Keywords

Thymoma, Myasthenia Gravis, Thymectomy, Robotic Assisted Thoracic Surgery

Brief summary

Recently, robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) has become into as an alternative approach to either, open surgery or video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery. The superiorities of RATS have been reported in series studies, such as intuitive movements, tremor filtration, more degrees of manipulative freedom, motion scaling, and high-definition stereoscopic vision. However, the currently reported robotic thymectomy used 3 ports. Theoretically, less incisions may bring faster postoperative recovery, lighter postoperative pain and higher postoperative quality of life. The investigators have successfully performed robotic thymectomy through 2 ports and even 1 port. However, the potential benefit of less ports robotic thymectomy has not been verified through well-designed cohort study, so this clinical trial has been designed.

Detailed description

The gold standard technique for thymectomy used to be transsternal approach. Advancements in modern technology bring many evolutions in minimally invasive surgery such as Video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) thymectomy gained popularity after 2000s. Recently, robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) has become into as an alternative approach to either, open surgery or video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery. The superiorities of RATS have been reported in series studies, such as intuitive movements, tremor filtration, more degrees of manipulative freedom, motion scaling, and high-definition stereoscopic vision. However, the currently reported robotic thymectomy used 3 ports. Theoretically, less incisions may bring faster postoperative recovery, lighter postoperative pain and higher postoperative quality of life. The investigators have successfully performed robotic thymectomy through 2 ports and even 1 port. However, the potential benefit of less ports robotic thymectomy has not been verified through well-designed cohort study, so this clinical trial has been designed.

Interventions

PROCEDURESigle port RATS

The incision is performed in the 5-6th intercostal space under the breast folds without violating the mammalian tissue. This port is used for the camera and both arms simultaneously.

PROCEDURETwo ports RATS

The incision is performed in the 4th intercostal space along anterior axillary fossa, for the camera and left arm. The other incision is subxiphoid longitudinal incision about 4cm for the right arm.

Sponsors

Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Shanghai, China
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Patients with Myasthenia Gravis and(or) thymoma need to perform thymectomy. 2. Agree to accept Robotic Assisted Thoracic Surgery and have signed informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

1. Cardiopulmonary function cannot tolerate thoracoscopic surgery or exist other contraindication. 2. Thymic carcinoma. 3. Thoracic deformity.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Post operation pain1 month after surgeryMeasured with Visual Analogue Score (VAS-score),the minimum value is 1, the maximum value is 10, higher scores mean a worse outcome.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Surgical bleedingDuring operationSurgical bleeding measured with milliliter
Operation durationDuring operationOperation duration measured with minute
Quality of life after surgery6 monthsMeasured with European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core30 (EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire), the higher scores mean a better outcome.
Curative effect5 yearsDisease free survival 5 years after surgery

Countries

China

Contacts

Primary Contactlei jiang, doctor
jiangleiem@aliyun.com+8613917912348

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026