Skip to content

Three-Dimensional Evaluation of the Airway Space After Distalization in Adults Using Carrière Motion Appliance

Three-Dimensional Evaluation of the Airway Space After Distalization in Adults Using Carrière Motion Appliance: Cone Beam Computed Tomographic Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05261217
Acronym
CBCT
Enrollment
18
Registered
2022-03-02
Start date
2019-12-18
Completion date
2021-03-20
Last updated
2022-03-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Orthodontic Appliance

Brief summary

Class II malocclusion is quite possibly most continuous treatment issues confronting orthodontists, addressing just about 33% malocclusions. connection between II malocclusion decreased pharyngeal aviation route measurements has been accounted for in writing. few treatment alternatives have been endeavored address this malocclusion, one those choices is distalize maxillary back without extraction treatment. In 2004 another machine presented Luis Carrière conveying his name, called Carrière Motion apparatus. Nonetheless, so far RCT in orthodontic writing assessed impact this machine elements aviation route. The point this examination assess impact this machine upper aviation route CBCT pictures in treatment post-pubertal patiets dental II malocclusion. near report led comprising 18 members age range from 18-30 years age. treatment impacts assessed radiographically utilizing pre post-distalization CBCT pictures after I connection has been reached. three dimentional investigation performed contemplate impacts distalization upper aviation route. gathered information then genuinely broke down for treatment changes among pre post-distalization.

Detailed description

Patients selected from outpatient center at Department Orthodontics, Faculty Oral Dental Medicine, Suez Canal University. Research Ethical Committee Faculty Oral Dental Medicine, Suez Canal University endorsed this investigation. Patients educated about methodology shown logical, enlivened recordings. 3\. Incorporation standards: The chose patients had met accompanying models: a) Adults full lasting dentition matured from (18-30). b) Dental II malocclusion beginning from half unit three quarter unit II relationship reciprocally where treatment plan did exclude extraction in upper curve. c) A ordinary skeletal maxilla typical or gentle direct retrognathic mandible. d) Normal or flat development design. e) All patients ought have great oral cleanliness ought consent inspiration directions give sensible forecast. f) Absence ejected maxillary third molars. g) The patients should be liberated from any foundational illness or medical conditions. 4\. Prohibition models: 1. Patients set experiences any genuine injury or medical procedure orofacial district. 2. sex inclination. 3. No history orthodontic treatment subjects. 4. No history obstructive breathing issues. 5-Methodology: 5.1 Preoperative intercession: A Medical History Questionnaire: A clinical filled patients bar any patients who might be experience ill effects any fundamental illness. Besides, patients checked ear nose throat expert affirm shortfall any aviation route problem. 5.2 Dental Case History Clinical Examination: A total dental case history acquired from every quiet patients analyzed clinically submitted both extraoral intraoral assessment. patients checked meet incorporation measures recently referenced. chose patients who met rules, alluded Periodontal Department centers for additional improvement oral cleanliness Restorative Department Clinics for any necessary fillings lastly alluded Oral Maxillofacial Surgery Department for extraction third maxillary molars in case they completely ejected in oral cavity. 5.3 Patients' Records: The accompanying records acquired from every understanding before endless supply treatment time, 5.3.1 Photographs For every tolerant bunch 4 extraoral 5 intraoral photos taken 5.3.2 Orthodontic Study Models All patients submitted upper lower impressions utilizing alginate impressionA material. wax wafer chomp additionally acquired. Impressions poured promptly utilizing extra hard stone model bases appropriately framed managed orthodontic norms 5.3.3 Cone Beam Computed Tomography: The chose patients submitted two CBCT examines; one pre-usable another after finish distalization utilizing Carrière Motion machine. CBCT pictures procured utilizing SOREDEX SCANORA 3D present in radiology office in Faculty Dentistry Suez Canal University. CBCT examining is performed producer's convention similar administrator. boundaries CBCT set suggestion assembling

Interventions

DEVICEThe motion 3D II appliance

The motion 3D II appliance treating class II malocclusion

Sponsors

Suez Canal University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 30 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Dental II malocclusion beginning from half unit three quarter unit II relationship reciprocally where treatment plan did exclude extraction in upper curve. A ordinary skeletal maxilla typical or gentle direct retrognathic mandible. Normal or flat development design. All patients ought have great oral cleanliness ought consent inspiration directions give sensible forecast. Absence ejected maxillary third molars. The patients should be liberated from any foundational illness or medical conditions.

Exclusion criteria

\-

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Cone Beam Computed Tomographynine monthsCBCT with Nasopharyngeal Airway Nasopharyngeal Airway Volume Oropharyngeal Airway Oropharyngeal Airway volume Hypopharyngeal Airway Hypopharyngeal Airway volume parameters

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026