Prosthesis; Cardiac, Heart, Functional Disturbance as Result, Prosthesis Survival
Conditions
Brief summary
The mechanical intervention is treating aortic valve stenosis (AVS) which may be performed using the standard open surgical approach for aortic valve replacement (AVR) or transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). The key question of this study is to establish the difference in all-cause and cause-specific (cardiac vs noncardiac) mortality, all hospitalizations for heart failure within 24 months of follow-up, left ventricular reverse remodeling after adjustment for death, as assessed by means of the left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV), in patients who received the TAVI vs the standard surgical procedure for AVS. Any potential failure of the devices in question will be thoroughly investigated by means of CT scanning and biomechanical computational modelling, utilising finite element analysis (FEA).
Detailed description
The target population enrolled in the study includes patients with aortic-valve stenosis at risk to severe valve obstruction who have had TAVI or standard surgical procedure of their aortic valve with or without coronary artery by pass grafting (CABG) or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Individuals were adequately treated per applicable standards, including for coronary artery disease (CAD), left ventricular (LV) dysfunction, AVS, and heart failure (HF). Patients enrolled in the studies were New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class II, III, or outpatient NYHA IV. Three groups of patients are included in the study. Patients who were managed with TAVI, patients who received AVR with conventional stented xenograft and recipients of AVR undergoing surgery with the use of sutureless aortic valve. we calculated that a total of 649 patients per group would be needed for 90% power to show an absolute between-groups difference of 10% in the primary outcome at a two-sided alpha level of 0.02 (corrected alpha level to take into account multiple comparison between 3 groups). In this exhaustive study between 2011 and 2021, we hope to include a total of 6700 patients (2800 in the TAVI group, 3200 patients who received AVR with conventional stented xenograft and 700 patients with the use of sutureless aortic valve). Two supplementary studies will be conducted. The study will concentrate on the CT scan evaluation of potential morphological and functional alterations in the aortic root following implantation of the respective devices, incorporating a comparative analysis. The second study will concentrate on the biomechanics of the implanted device and potential failure, using a finite element analysis investigation.
Interventions
DEVICETranscatheter Aortic Valve Implantation
Patients who are deemed receive TAVI first underwent evaluation of their peripheral arteries before the procedure, in order to separate those eligible for transfemoral placement (TFP) from those who would require transapical placement. Technological advances achieved in the new platforms for the treatment of SHD have allowed the use of reduced size catheters and sheaths in the new armamentarium, favoring the TFP technique. The transcatheter valve (TV) is positioned at the level of the native aortic valve during the final step of valve replacement, when the balloon is inflated within the native valve during a brief period of rapid ventricular pacing. The delivery system i traverses the aorta retrograde over a guidewire from its point of insertion in the femoral artery during the use of TFP. Before balloon inflation, the valve and balloon are collapsed on the catheter and fit within the sheath. After balloon inflation, the calcified native valve is replaced by the expanded TV
PROCEDUREBioprothesis
The bioprosthesis is implanted using the SAVR procedure during median sternotomy in extracorporeal circulation. Minimally invasive procedures using a thoracotomy approach and peripheral cannulation have found widespread use.
PROCEDURESutureless
The sutureless is implanted using the SAVR procedure during median sternotomy in extracorporeal circulation. Minimally invasive procedures using a thoracotomy approach and peripheral cannulation have found widespread use.
Sponsors
Centre Cardiologique du Nord
Henri Mondor University Hospital
Universita degli Studi di Genova
Study design
Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 90 Years
Inclusion criteria
* Individuals enrolled in TAVI arm were required to have the predicted risk of operative mortality was ≥ 15% and/or a STS score of ≥ 10. A candidate who did not meet the STS score criteria of ≥ 10 was included in the study if a peer review by at least two surgeon investigators concluded and documented that the patient's predicted risk of operative mortality was ≥ 15%. For all group Senile degenerative aortic valve stenosis with echocardiography derived criteria: mean gradient \> 40 mm Hg or jet velocity \> 4.0 m/s or an aortic valve area (AVA) of \< 0.8 cm2 (or AVA index \< 0.5 cm2/m2).
Exclusion criteria
* • Patients with evidence of an acute myocardial infarction ≤ 1 month before the intended treatment (defined as Q wave MI, or non-Q wave MI with total CK elevation ≥ twice normal in the presence of CK-MB elevation and/or troponin level elevation. * Blood dyscrasias as defined : leukopenia (WBC \< 3000 mm3), acute anemia (Hb \< 9 mg%), thrombocytopenia (platelet count \< 50,000 cells/mm³), history of bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy. * Hemodynamic instability requiring inotropic therapy or mechanical hemodynamic support devices * Need for emergency surgery for any reason. * Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy with or without obstruction. * Severe ventricular dysfunction with LVEF \< 20%. * Echocardiographic evidence of intracardiac mass, thrombus or vegetation. * Active peptic ulcer or upper gastro-intestinal bleeding within the prior 3 months. * A known hypersensitivity or contraindication to aspirin, heparin, ticlopidine (Ticlid), or clopidogrel * (Plavix), or sensitivity to contrast media, which cannot be adequately pre-medicated. * For TAVI arm Native aortic annulus size \< 18mm or 25mm as measured by echocardiogram. * Subject was offered surgery but refused surgery. * Recent (within 6 months) cerebrovascular accident or transient ischemic attack. * Renal insufficiency (creatinine \> 3.0mg/dL) and/or end stage renal disease requiring chronic * dialysis. * Life expectancy \< 12 months due to non-cardiac co-morbid conditions. * For TAVI group significant abdominal or thoracic aorta disease, including aneurysm (defined as maximal luminal diameter 5 cm or greater), marked tortuosity, aortic arch atheroma, narrowing of the abdominal aorta with particular regard for calcification and surface irregularities, or severe "unfolding" and tortuosity of the thoracic aorta. This criteria were applicable for transfemoral patients only. * For TAVI group Iliofemoral vessel characteristics that would preclude safe placement of 14F or 18F introducer * For TAVI arm sheath such as severe calcification, severe tortuosity or vessels size diameter \< 7 mm for 22F * Active bacterial endocarditis or other active infections. * For TAVI arm bulky calcified aortic valve leaflets in close proximity to coronary ostia.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Treatment failure | 5 years | The primary end point of the study is the degree of treatment failure as assessed by death, recurrent aortic valve regurgitation and reoperation |
| Hospitalizations for Heart Failure (HF) | 5 yeras | The secondary endpoint of the study is the evaluation of hospedalization rates for heart failure valve due to structural/ non structural valve deterioration, thromboembolism and recurrent endocarditis |
| Determining Device Malfunction Through CT Evaluation of the Aortic Root | 5 years | The primary endpoint of the study is the degree of device failure, assessed by measuring the aortic root via CT scan |
| Predictive Determination of Device Malfunction Through FEA of the Aortic Root | 5 years | The primary objective of the study is to assess the degree of device malfunction. This is achieved by measuring the mechanical characteristics of the aortic root using computational modelling. The modelling compares different implanted devices. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Mortality | 5 years | The secondary endpoint of the study is the evaluation of overall mortality |
| Cardiac Death | 5 years | The secondary endpoint of the study is the evaluation of cardiac death |
| Non Cardiac Death | 5 years | The secondary endpoint of the study is the evaluation of non cardiac death |
| Major Adverse Cardiac or Cerebrovascular Events (MACCE) | 5 years | Composite of major adverse cardiac or cerebrovascular events (rate of death, stroke, subsequent mitral valve surgery, hospitalization for heart failure, or an increase in New York Heart Association class higher than one), serious adverse events, recurrent aortic regurgitation, quality of life, and rehospitalization |
| Echocardiographic Parameter Changes (LVEF) | 5 years | Changes from baseline parameters including left ventricular ejection fraction |
| Echocardiographic Parameter Changes ( AVR recurrence) | 5 years | Recurrent moderate-to-severe aortic regurgitation after intervention |
| Echocardiographic Parameter Changes (LVEDD/LVEDV) | 5 years | Changes from baseline Left Ventricular End Diastolic Diameter or Volume |
Countries
France
Contacts
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORFrancesco Nappi
Cardiac Surgery Centre Cardiologique du Nord de Saint-Denis, Paris, France
Outcome results
None listed