Skip to content

Laparascopic Sleeve Gastrectomy vs. Endoscopic Gastric Plication in Obesity

The Influence of Laparascopic SLeeve gAstrectomy Vs. Endoscopic Gastric Plication on Body weIght, Metabolic pArameters and Microbiota Composition in Patients With Obesity: Randomized, Open-labelled Study (SLAVIA Trial)

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05259644
Acronym
SLAVIA
Enrollment
75
Registered
2022-02-28
Start date
2022-02-28
Completion date
2024-12-31
Last updated
2022-02-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Obesity

Keywords

Obesity, Diabetes mellitus, Endoscopy, Surgery, Gut microbiota

Brief summary

The project will describe the efficacy and safety of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and endoscopic gastric plication procedures as compared to conservative therapy and clarify the mechanisms of action of these treatments. The project will also contribute to more precise indications of bariatric or endoscopic methods in clinical practice and enable personalized choice of therapy for particular patient.

Detailed description

Bariatric surgery is the most efficacious treatment of obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Novel endoscopic methods based on the principles of bariatric surgery are also highly effective. No direct randomized comparison of both types of treatment has been performed to date and the mechanisms of action of both procedures are still only partially clarified. The aim of the project is to perform a randomized trial comparing efficacy and safety of three treatment options in patients with obesity: laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy, endoscopic gastric plication and conservative treatment. A further aim is to characterize the influence of the three treatments on subclinical inflammation, gut microbiota composition and changes of gastrointestinal hormones. The results of the project will describe the efficacy and safety of these procedures as compared to conservative therapy and clarify the mechanisms of action of these treatments. The project will also contribute to more precise indications of bariatric or endoscopic methods in clinical practice and enable personalized choice of therapy for particular patient.

Interventions

DEVICElaparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy

Surgical procedure - laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy.

OTHERconservative treatment of obesity

Diet and exercise

Endoscopic procedure - endoscopic gastric plication

Sponsors

Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Investigator)

Intervention model description

In total 75 patients will be randomized into 3 groups.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. BMI \> 35 kg/m2 2. For patients with type 2 diabetes - stable antidiabetic medication \> 1 month 3. Age 18-60 years

Exclusion criteria

1. Other diabetes mellitus types (type 1 DM, monogenic DM, secondary DM) 2. Prior gastrointestinal (GIT) surgery interfering with study procedure 3. Severe gastroesophageal reflux, severe GIT motility disorder 4. Active malignancy 5. Acute myocardial infarction, unstable angina pectoris, acute stroke 3 months prior to enrolment 6. Acute liver or kidney failure 7. Transplantation of insulin producing tissue 8. Gravidity or lactation 9. Mental disorder 10. Inability to sign informed consent 11. Any other contraindication of bariatric surgery or bariatric endoscopy procedure 6\. Acute liver or kidney failure 7. Transplantation of insulin producing tissue 8. Gravidity or lactation 9. Mental disorder 10. Inability to sign informed consent 11. Any other contraindication of bariatric surgery or bariatric endoscopy procedure

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Body Weight6 monthsTo compare the change in body weight after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy ve. endoscopic gastric plication and endoscopic gastric plication vs. conservative treatment of obesity

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Glycated Hemoglobin6 monthsTo compare the change in glycated hemoglobin after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy ve. endoscopic gastric plication and endoscopic gastric plication vs. conservative treatment of obesity
Change in serum glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1)6 monthsTo compare the change in serum glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy ve. endoscopic gastric plication and endoscopic gastric plication vs. conservative treatment of obesity
Change in fasting blood glucose6 monthsTo compare the change in fasting blood glucose after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy ve. endoscopic gastric plication and endoscopic gastric plication vs. conservative treatment of obesity

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Rehospitalizations6 monthsTo compare the rate of rehospitalizations after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and endoscopic gastric plication vs. conservative treatment of obesity
Change in the IWQOL (The Impact of Weight on Quality of Life) questionnaire6 monthsTo compare the change in quality of life as assessed by the IWQOL (The Impact of Weight on Quality of Life) questionnaire after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and endoscopic gastric plication vs. conservative treatment of obesity
Change in hsCRP6 monthsTo compare the change in high sensitive C reactive protein as a marker of low grade inflammation after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and endoscopic gastric plication vs. conservative treatment of obesity

Countries

Czechia

Contacts

Primary ContactJan Kral, MD
jan.kral@ikem.cz+420236053280
Backup ContactEven Machytka, MD
even.machytka@ikem.cz+420236053280

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026