Skip to content

ARMA for Postoperative GERD After Sleeve Gastrectomy

Anti-reflux Mucosal Ablation (ARMA) for the Treatment of Postoperative Gastroesophageal Reflux After Sleeve Gastrectomy - A Pilot Study

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05259579
Enrollment
15
Registered
2022-02-28
Start date
2022-02-01
Completion date
2023-07-31
Last updated
2022-02-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Gastroesophageal Reflux

Brief summary

This study is a pilot trial designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of endoscopic anti-reflux ablation in postoperative gastroesophageal reflux after sleeve gastrectomy

Interventions

Mucosal ablation is planned around the cardia on the gastric side in a butterfly shape. Submucosal layer is raised by injecting saline with indigo carmine dye. Mucosal ablation is performed using the triangle-tip knife in spray coagulation mode.

Sponsors

Chinese University of Hong Kong
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with reflux symptoms after sleeve gastrectomy and are dependent on or refractory to PPI treatment * Pathological esophageal acid exposure, defined by DeMeester score \>14.7 or acid exposure time (AET) \>4.2% on pH study

Exclusion criteria

* Primary esophageal motility disorders * Sliding hiatal hernia \>3cm * Narrow gastric sleeve that precludes retroflexion of scope * Gastric sleeve stricture * Malignancy * Pregnancy * Patients not fit for general anesthesia * Other cases deemed by the examining physician as unsuitable for safe treatment * Refusal to participate

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in GERD symptoms3 and 6monthsGastroesophageal Reflux Disease-Health-Related Quality of Life (GERD-HRQL) questionnaire score \[0-75, higher scores mean worse outcome\]

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in DeMeester score and AET3 monthsevaluated by 24-hour pH monitoring
Dysphagia symptoms3 and 6 monthsevaluated by the Brief Esophageal Dysphagia Questionnaire (BEDQ) score \[0-40, higher score mean worse outcome\]
Technical success rate1 daydefined as successful completion of endoscopic procedure
Changes in cardia morphology3 monthsendoscopic assessment of Hill's flap grade
Adverse events rate relating to endoscopic intervention7 days, 1, 3 and 6 monthscomplication including bleeding, perforation and stricture
PPI use3 and 6 monthsdosage of PPI use after procedure

Countries

Hong Kong

Contacts

Primary ContactStephen Ng, FRCSEd(Gen)
stephenng@surgery.cuhk.edu.hk+85235052956

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026