Skip to content

The Health for Hearts United Collaborative

The Health for Hearts United Collaborative

Status
Enrolling by invitation
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05259150
Acronym
HHUC
Enrollment
225
Registered
2022-02-28
Start date
2022-01-15
Completion date
2027-12-31
Last updated
2026-04-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cardiovascular Disease Risk Reduction

Brief summary

This proposed project will determine the effectiveness of Health for Hearts United Collaborative (HHUC) implementation strategies in relation to process outcomes and reducing cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk in African Americans (AAs),examining two possible strategies.

Detailed description

This project will determine the effectiveness of HHUC implementation strategies in relation to process outcomes and reducing CVD risk in AAs, guided by ecological theory, the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), and the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation and Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework. The HHUC model currently includes three components: governance structure, annual events, and basic support. The investigators propose adding a fourth component that includes one of two possible implementation strategies: 1) an internal champions (IC)-driven strategy that includes two features (leadership development, culturally-tailored planning approaches) or 2) an external change agent (external professionals \[EP\])-driven strategy without these features. The investigators will pilot and refine the IC and EP-driven implementation strategies using health leaders from four churches in the two-county area by determining feasibility and acceptability. Following the pilot, the investigators will use an effectiveness implementation hybrid Type 3 design to evaluate the IC and EP implementation strategies in relation to process outcomes. The study will be conducted in a two-county area in North Florida, using congregants ((18 years of age and older, n=225) in nine churches: three IC treatment, three EP treatment, and three comparison with delayed comparable activities.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALHealth for Hearts United Planning for Health

Participants (health leaders) receive trainings (three entitled Take Charge of Your Health, Eat Better, \& Move Around More) and plan for their health ministry and cardiovascular health program to congregants.

BEHAVIORALHealth for Hearts United Preparing for Health

Research participants (church congregants) receive cardiovascular health programming prepared by health leaders that includes the following best practices: Individual Goal Setting, Training, Culturally-tailored Materials, Monitoring Tool \& Recognition.

BEHAVIORALHealth for Hearts United Delivery of Health

The Organization (church) uses best practices to implement Heart Health activities (annual plans, achievements, plans for the year and practices).

OTHERHealth for Hearts United Comparison Group Health Ministry Development

Participants (health leaders) have meetings to develop the health ministry. Research participants (church congregants) do not receive cardiovascular health program.

Sponsors

Florida State University
Lead SponsorOTHER
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Georgia
CollaboratorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

effectiveness implementation hybrid Type 3 design

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* African American, * 18 years of age and older, * not pregnant in the last six months, * not hospitalized or having a clinically significant medical condition in the past six months

Exclusion criteria

* not being African American, * under the age of 18, * pregnant in the last six months, * hospitalized or having a clinically significant medical condition in the past six months.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Participant Reach12 monthsPercent of participants that are retained in the intervention which will be computed by dividing the number of participants who complete the intervention by the number who enrolled.
Intervention Adoption12 monthsNumber of participants who attend intervention sessions which is computed by adding the number of attendees to create total attendance.
Intervention Implementation12 monthsChecklist to be developed by the investigators and completed by staff that monitors church health leaders' planning for health ministry development and delivery of program to participants.
Intervention Maintenance12 monthsChecklist to be developed by investigators regarding whether or not annual plans are submitted. The instrument will include the list of churches and columns for checking yes or no.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Food choice12 monthsFood choice questionnaire which is an 18 item list of foods frequently consumed by African Americans, modified from questionnaires in the literature. Participants respond by indicating if they eat the food item, how frequently (daily, weekly, monthly, yearly, or a few times a year) and serving size (small, medium and large).
Fruit and vegetable intake12 monthsNational Cancer Institute Fruit and Vegetable Screener is a 10-item instrument that includes respondent assessment of portion size. Scores represent number of servings of fruits and vegetables on a daily basis, ranging from the minimum of zero (0). There is no upper maximum score. The higher the number, the more fruit and vegetable servings consumed daily.
Fat intake12 monthsNational Cancer Institute Fat Screener is a 16 item instrument that measures percent of energy from fat. Scores can range from 0 percent to 100 percent. The higher percent, the higher percent of energy from fat.
Self-report Physical activity12 monthsYale Physical Activity Scale (YPAS) uses a simple checklist to provide estimates of energy expenditure from activity time (minutes per week) and activity dimensions (e.g., housework, yard work) during a typical day/week. Scores can range from 0 kcal/week minimum to 85,680 kcal/week maximum The higher the kcal/week, the higher the physical activity levels.
Objective physical activity12 monthsWearing of an accelerometer (ActiGraph Corporation, Pensacola, FL) which will be worn on the right hip of each participant for five consecutive days. A wear time of 480 min/day will be used as the criterion for a valid day.
Blood pressure12 monthsThree blood pressure readings (systolic and diastolic)
Weight12 monthsWeight in kilograms
Height12 monthsHeight in centimeters
Hip circumference12 monthsMeasurement of hips in inches using tape measure
Waist circumference12 monthsMeasurement of waist in inches using tape measure
Abdomen circumference12 monthsMeasurement of abdomen in inches using tape measure

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 3, 2026