Skip to content

Pre-labor Ultrasound as a Visual Biofeedback Device for Maternal Pushing Education

Pre-labor Ultrasound as a Visual Biofeedback Device for Maternal Pushing Education and Pelvic Floor Training - a Randomized Control Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05258786
Enrollment
120
Registered
2022-02-28
Start date
2022-02-18
Completion date
2024-01-28
Last updated
2024-01-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Delivery Complication, Pregnancy Related

Keywords

pre-labor education, biofeedback, ultrasound, vaginal delivery, fear of childbirth

Brief summary

The study will observe the effect of antenatal biofeedback with transperineal and abdominal ultrasound applied by a pelvic floor physical therapist. The training will focus on pelvic floor training and maternal-coached pushing with ultrasound-based visual biofeedback. The investigators aim to assess maternal and neonatal obstetrical outcomes, urinary and fecal incontinence, and maternal psychological effects.

Detailed description

Childbirth is a challenging process both emotionally and physically. The anxiety and anticipation accompanying pregnancy, labor, and delivery were reported to be relieved by pre-labor education, providing knowledge regarding the physiological process of labor to future parents. Ultrasound examination enables the laboring women the opportunity to see fetal head movements in response to maternal pushing, and previous studies have revealed the physiological and psychological advantages of ultrasound-mediated intrapartum biofeedback during the second stage of labor. Pre-labor sonographic maternal coaching has the advantage of a clean setting, avoiding the stressful, frequently hectic nature of labor and delivery wards, and may enable a more comprehensive implementation of the method, a structured training program, and better physical and psychological outcomes. All available literature regarding the application of intrapartum and pre-labor ultrasound refers to the examination performed by obstetricians. The study will observe the effect of antenatal biofeedback with transperineal and abdominal ultrasound applied by a pelvic floor physical therapist. The training will focus on two aspects: pelvic floor training and maternal coached pushing - both with ultrasound-based visual biofeedback. The investigators aim to assess maternal and neonatal obstetrical outcomes, urinary and fecal incontinence, and maternal psychological outcomes.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALPre-labor ultrasound as a visual biofeedback device for maternal pushing education and pelvic floor training

1. Ultrasound examination with the screen turned to the provider will assess the bladder movements at rest and during contraction of the pelvic floor and fetal head descent at rest and during pushing. 2. The provider will turn the screen to the patient and explain the anatomical landmarks: bladder, fetal head, birth canal direction. 3. A repeat of the first stage (1) with the screen turned to the patient: the biofeedback process. Bladder displacement will serve as a marker of pelvic floor contraction, and the delta in the progression angle will serve as a marker for effective pushing. 4. Finally, the provider will turn the screen again from the patient and repeat the first stage.

Sponsors

Ariel University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

The outcomes assessor will collect the data from the files without knowing the participant's groups (intervention/control/standard care)

Intervention model description

Randomized controlled study

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* pregnant nullipara women with a low-risk pregnancy who are planned for vaginal delivery. The biofeedback will occur at 36-42 gestational weeks.

Exclusion criteria

* an inability to fill questionaries due to communication issues or cesarean section performed due to major obstetrical events.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
length of the second stage of laborup to 1 week after labormeasure by time (min/hour)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mode of deliveryup to 1 week after laborNumber of Participants with spontaneous vaginal or operative delivery (operative assisted - vacuum-assisted, forceps assisted, cesarean delivery)
Perineal tearsup to 1 week after laborNumber of Participants with Perineal tears, specifically OASIS - obstetric anal sphincter Number of Participants with injuries
Urinary and fecal incontinenceup to 1 week after labor, and 2 month after labor.Number of Participants with Urinary and/ or fecal incontinence
Fear of birth questionnaireBaseline, a week later , 1 week after labor and two months after labor6-36, higher score mean worse outcome.

Countries

Israel

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 23, 2026