Hemiparesis
Conditions
Brief summary
Chronic stroke survivors suffering from weaknesses or movement difficulties in their hand/arm are provided a system to aid in at-home rehabilitation for 6 weeks. This rehabilitation system includes a headband that measures and provides feedback from the brain during rehabilitation, together with tablet-based software. Throughout the 6 week rehabilitation period (as well as in a follow-up session 1 month afterwards) several assessments are taken to understand the effect of this rehabilitation on participant's movement abilities, as well as their brain activity.
Interventions
Rehabilitation system comprised of functional near-infrared spectroscopy headband (measuring from the motor cortex), as well as tablet-based software application (guiding stroke survivors through rehabilitation exercises for their hands/arms).
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Age 18 - 90 years * 6 months - 5 years since most recent stroke * Upper-extremity Fugl-Meyer motor function (FMA-UE) score ≤56 * Able to follow simple commands * Fluency in English * Not currently receiving therapy for the upper extremity
Exclusion criteria
* Visual impairment that would interfere with visualization of the therapy interface (score \>0 on the visual subscale of the NIH stroke scale) * Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) Score ≥10 * History of significant physical disability prior to most recent stroke * Open wounds on the scalp * Unable or unwilling to remove hair braids or head coverings which interfere with the Axem Home device efficacy. * Inability to follow training instructions for at-home BCI system.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Determine whether there are participants who respond to at-home upper-extremity BCI rehabilitation. | 6 weeks | Some participants will demonstrate a pre- to post-test increase of 6 in the Fugl-Meyer Upper-Extremity subscale. |
| Determine when in the course of the study (if at all) fNIRS data contains predictive information regarding the likelihood that participants would respond to at-home BCI rehabilitation. | 6 weeks | Significant differences between responders and non-responders (as defined in the endpoint of primary objective 1) in fNIRS measures taken either during pre-test fNIRS tasks or at-home BCI sessions which are not accounted for by pre-test FMA-UE assessment scores (see Statistical Methods below for more information). |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Determine whether participants can learn to modulate motor cortex brain activity during at-home BCI rehabilitation using a prototype wireless fNIRS device. | 6 weeks | A significant difference between mean ∆HbO during either (1) the MI Task conducted at the pre-test period and MI during at-home BCI sessions conducted during week 5 and/or (2) the Motor Execution Task conducted at the pre-test ME Task and ME during at-home BCI sessions conducted during week 5 (see Statistical Methods below for more information). |
| If secondary objective 1 is met, determine whether learning to modulate motor cortex brain activity during at-home BCI rehabilitation increases the likelihood of benefitting from at-home BCI rehabilitation. | 6 weeks | A significant relationship between the ability to modulate motor cortex brain activity during at-home BCI (as defined in the endpoint of secondary objective 1) and their change in FMA-UE from their pre- to post-test assessments (see Statistical Methods below for more information). |
| If any of primary objectives 1-4 are met, show that the improvements in function achieved by responders to at-home BCI rehabilitation is maintained after the at-home BCI rehabilitation is discontinued. | 10 weeks | At least one of the significant differences in FMA-UE scores observed between the pre- and post-tests are maintained at the follow-up session (see Statistical Methods below for more information). |
Countries
United States