Skip to content

ESP Block VS Intrathecal Opioid After Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery

Randomized Prospective Study Comparison of Erector Spinae Plane Block and Intrathecal Opioid for Postoperative Analgesia After Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery in an Enhanced Recovery Setting

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 1Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05257941
Enrollment
116
Registered
2022-02-25
Start date
2022-01-27
Completion date
2024-08-29
Last updated
2026-03-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Surgery

Brief summary

This study is being done to compare 2 types of pain control methods and determine which is more effective postoperatively for laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Group 1 will receive an intrathecal (IT) injection in the back in which a small dose duramorph and bupivacaine will be placed into the spinal fluid. Group 2 will receive an erector spinae plane (ESP) block in which bupivacaine and decadron are injected near the nerves under a muscle in the back.

Detailed description

All laparoscopic colorectal cases were scheduled by colorectal surgeons at IU Health University or Methodist Hospital and were identified using medical records. The subjects were contacted face-to-face prior to surgery. They were informed about the study and questions were answered. The potential subjects were given a copy of the informed consent form and authorization form. The subjects were contacted face-to-face in Pre-Operative Care Unit on the day of surgery and if they decided to participate, written consent was taken. In the Intrathecal group, intrathecal preservative free morphine (duramorph) 200 mcg with 7.5mg of hyperbaric bupivacaine was given for a patient 18-75 years of age and duramorph 150 mcg with 7.5mg of hyperbaric bupivacaine was given for a patient 76- 80 years of age. In the ESP group, a patient was given a bilateral ESP block at thoracic vertebrae level 10 (T10). This was placed under ultrasound using 30 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine and 4 mg of Decadron. Randomization will be performed using Research Randomizer. The primary investigator informed the person doing the regional techniques as to what group the patients were randomized to. Neither the patients and the research staff doing assessments will be blinded to the randomization.

Interventions

DRUGIT Injection

an intrathecal (IT) injection in the back in which a small dose duramorph and bupivacaine will be placed into the spinal fluid

DRUGESP Block

an erector spinae plane (ESP) block in which bupivacaine and decadron are injected near the nerves under a muscle in the back

Sponsors

Indiana University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients undergoing an elective laparoscopic colorectal procedure at Indiana University Hospital or Methodist Hospital * ASA Class 1, 2, 3 (American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification system) * Age 18 to 80 years (male or female) * BMI \< 40kg/m2 * Desires regional anesthesia for postoperative pain control

Exclusion criteria

* Any contraindication for neuraxial analgesia or ESP block procedure * Contraindications for neuraxial analgesia include: Elevated intracranial pressure (except in cases of pseudo-tumor cerebri), infection at the site of injection, lack of consent from the patient, patient refusal, true allergy to any drug used in the spine, and uncorrected hypovolemia. * Contraindications for ESP block procedure include: Infection at the site of injection, patient refusal, true allergy to any of the drugs used in the block, and lack of patient consent. * Any patient undergoing a laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection. * Any physical, mental or medical conditions which, in the opinion of the investigators, may confound quantifying postoperative pain resulting from surgery. * Known true allergy to the study medications (morphine, bupivacaine, decadron, Tylenol, Celebrex) * Takes over 30 mg of oral morphine equivalents daily * Any history of substance abuse in the past 6 months * End stage liver disease, end stage renal disease * Body weight of \< 50 kg

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
24 Hour Cumulated Oral Morphine Equivalent (OME)24 hours after surgery24 hour cumulated oral morphine consumption (OME)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Oral Morphine Equivalents (OME)1 hour after surgeryOral Morphine Equivalents consumed
Visual Analog Scale Pain Scores1 hour after surgerypain scores using the Visual Analog Scale (0-10 with 0 being no pain and 10 being the worst pain)
First AmbulationDuration of hospital stay up to 72 hoursTime to patient first ambulation
First FlatusDuration of hospital stay up to 72 hoursTime to first flatus
Oral LiquidDuration of hospital stay up to 72 hoursTime to first oral liquid intake
Oral FoodDuration of hospital stay up to 72 hoursTime to first oral food intake
Hospital Length of StayDuration of hospital stay up to 7 daysAmount of time each subject spends in the hospital before discharge
Patient's Satisfaction Scores24 hours after surgeryAssess patient's satisfaction with care (1-10 with 1 being the least satisfied and 10 being the most satisfied)
Number of Participants With Side EffectsDuration of hospital stay up to 72 hoursIncidence of urinary retention, ileus, spinal headache, pruritis, respiratory depression, injection site infection, nerve damage, hematoma, pneumothorax, lower extremity weakness.
NauseaDuration of hospital stay up to 72 hourspoint in time of which had nausea

Countries

United States

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORAmy McCutchan, MD

Indiana University School of Medicine

Baseline characteristics

Characteristic
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
37 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
70 Participants
Age, Continuous61 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
51 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
61 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
22 Participants
weight80 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 560 / 51
other
Total, other adverse events
7 / 562 / 51
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 560 / 51

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 3, 2026