Skip to content

Management of Breathlessness with High-flow Nasal Therapy or a Fan

Management of Breathlessness with High-flow Nasal Therapy or a Fan

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05257850
Enrollment
36
Registered
2022-02-25
Start date
2022-04-26
Completion date
2024-12-31
Last updated
2025-01-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Breathlessness, Cancer

Brief summary

Airflow directed to the face by a fan is shown to relief breathlessness in palliative care and some studies have suggested High-Flow nasal airflow therapy beneficial as well. However, these two treatments have not been compared. 40 patients with advanced cancer and breathlessness are recruited from Tampere University Hospital or Pirkanmaa Hospice. All patients are treated with two therapies: 1. High-Flow nasal airflow therapy with a nasal cannula and 2. airflow directed to the face by a fan. Both treatment periods last 30 minutes or as long as the patient wish to use the therapy. The effects of the therapies on breathlessness are compared by asking the subjective relief of breathlessness after each therapies. The study do not limit any other therapies used in the normal clinical care for the patients. Thus, all the other therapies the physicians taking care of the patient orders are permitted. Hopefully, the patients achieve relief for their breathlessness through the study treatments given in addition to their normal treatment. There are no significant risks related to the therapies, but they may cause some inconveniences such as mouth dryness. These possible side-effects of the therapies are asked as well.

Detailed description

Airflow directed to the face by a fan is shown to relief breathlessness in palliative care and some studies have suggested High-Flow nasal airflow therapy beneficial as well. However, these two treatments have not been compared and High-Flow nasal airflow therapy has not been tested in the context of hospice. 40 patients over 18 years with advanced cancer and breathlessness are recruited from Tampere University Hospital or Pirkanmaa Hospice. All patients are treated with two therapies: 1. High-Flow nasal airflow therapy with a nasal cannula and 2. airflow directed to the face by a fan (crossover trial). Both treatment periods last 30 minutes or as long as the patient wish to use the therapy. The effects of the therapies on breathlessness are compared by asking the subjective relief of breathlessness after each therapies with numeric rating scale (NRS) from 0 (no breathlessness) to 10 (the worst possible breathlessness). Influence of the treatments on anxiety, pain and mouth dryness are measured as well with numeric rating scale (NRS) from 0 to 10. The study do not limit any other therapies used in the normal clinical care for the patients. Thus, all the other therapies the physicians taking care of the patient orders are permitted. Hopefully, the patients achieve relief for their breathlessness through the study treatments given in addition to their normal treatment. There are no significant risks related to the therapies, but they may cause some inconveniences such as mouth dryness. These possible side-effects of the therapies are asked as well.

Interventions

A high-flow nasal therapy for 30 minutes.

A fan directed to the face for 30 minutes

Sponsors

Tampere University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Advanced cancer * At least 18 years of age * Breathlessness (At least 3 on a NRS-scale from 0 to 10) * Capable to understand the study and to give informed consent * Do not benefit from ICU treatment or resuscitation defined by the physician taking care of the patient

Exclusion criteria

* Insufficient co-operation for the study treatment or to give informed consent * Oxygen saturation under 88 % on room air * Need for other device to treat the breathlessness * The reason of breathlessness can be immediately treated

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Breathlessness after the study treatments (difference between the High-Flow Nasal Therapy and a fan)Measurements are made immediately before and immediately after the treatment period.The breathlessness after the study treatments measured by numeric rating scale (NRS) from 0 (no breathlessness) to 10 (the worst possible breathlessness).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in mouth dryness before and after the treatmentsMeasurements are made immediately before and immediately after the treatment period.Change in mouth dryness before and after the treatments measured by numeric rating scale (NRS) from 0 (no mouth dryness) to 10 (the worst possible mouth dryness).
Change in anxiety before and after the treatmentsMeasurements are made immediately before and immediately after the treatment period.Change in anxiety before and after the treatments measured by numeric rating scale (NRS) from 0 (no anxiety) to 10 (the worst possible anxiety).
Change in pain before and after the treatmentsMeasurements are made immediately before and immediately after the treatment period.Change in pain before and after the treatments measured by numeric rating scale (NRS) from 0 (no pain) to 10 (the worst possible pain).
Change in respiratory frequency with the treatmentsMeasurements are made immediately before and immediately after the treatment period.Change in respiratory frequency measured by calculating breaths per minute.
Change in breathlessness before and after the treatmentsMeasurements are made immediately before and immediately after the treatment period.Change in breathlessness before and after the treatments measured by numeric rating scale (NRS) from 0 (no breathlessness) to 10 (the worst possible breathlessness).
Change in oxygen saturation with the treatmentsMeasurements are made immediately before and immediately after the treatment period.Change in peripheral oxygen saturation (%) measured with pulse oximeter.
Proportion of patients reporting to have overall benefit of the treatmentsOpinion is asked immediately after the treatmentProportion of patients reporting to have overall benefit of the treatments
Proportion of patients who report side-effects of the treatmentsExperienced side-effects are asked immediately after the treatmentProportion of patients who report side-effects of the treatments
Change in heart rate with the treatmentsMeasurements are made immediately before and immediately after the treatment period.Change in heart rate measured by calculating heart beats per minute.

Countries

Finland

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026