Skip to content

Testing the Efficacy of REThink Main Game-based ER Strategies on the Stress Reactivity

Testing the Usability of the REThink Game and the Efficacy of Its Main Game-based ER Strategies on the Stress Reactivity of Children and Adolescents

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05257642
Enrollment
146
Registered
2022-02-25
Start date
2022-03-10
Completion date
2022-11-15
Last updated
2024-12-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Emotion Regulation

Brief summary

This activity will aim to test the comparative efficacy of the main game-based emotion-regulation abilities training of the REThink online game: cognitive change, biofeedback and problem-solving in reducing stress reactivity of the children and adolescents

Detailed description

Children included in this study (aged 8-16 years, G\*Power estimated N=98) will be allocated to one of the three experimental conditions (cognitive change, biofeedback and problem-solving game based training based on the REThink online game levels), or no intervention Control condition. All children will be exposed afterwards to psychosocial stress in the form of peer rejection ball toss task. It will be measure both game-based skills outcomes, and EMA stress reactivity outcomes.

Interventions

REThink is a online therapeutic game developed by David and collaborators (2018), proved to be an efficient intervention to reduce emotional symptoms of children and adolescents.

Sponsors

The Executive Agency for Higher Education, Research, Development and Innovation Funding
CollaboratorOTHER
Babes-Bolyai University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
8 Years to 16 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

children and adolescents between 8 and 16 years provided written parental consent

Exclusion criteria

Intellectual disability or physical limitations precluded the use of the computer program

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Levels of rational and irrational beliefsPre-intervention (one week before the intervention)The Child and Adolescent Scale of Irrationality (CASI, Bernard & Cronan, 1999) will be used in order to test irrational/rational beliefs as a mechanism of change. Children and adolescents were asked to express their agreement/disagreement with the 28 statements on a 5-point Likert-type scale, from 1 (strong disagreement) to 5 (strong agreement)
Changes in rational and irrational beliefsPost-intervention (one week afterthe intervention)The Child and Adolescent Scale of Irrationality (CASI, Bernard & Cronan, 1999) will be used in order to test irrational/rational beliefs as a mechanism of change. Children and adolescents were asked to express their agreement/disagreement with the 28 statements on a 5-point Likert-type scale, from 1 (strong disagreement) to 5 (strong agreement)
Levels of mindfulnessPre-intervention (one week before the intervention)The Mindfulness Awarness Attention Scale - Child version (MAAS-C, Lawlor, Reichl & Zumbo, 2014) is a 15-items questionnaire rated on a 6 points Likert scale from almost never to almost every time where higher scores means higher mindfulness.
Changes in levels of mindfulnessPost-intervention (one week afterthe intervention)The Mindfulness Awarness Attention Scale - Child version (MAAS-C, Lawlor, Reichl & Zumbo, 2014) is a 15-items questionnaire rated on a 6 points Likert scale from almost never to almost every time where higher scores means higher mindfulness.
Levels of well-beingPre-intervention (one week before the intervention)WHO-5 Well-being Index
Changes in levels of well-beingPost-intervention (one week afterthe intervention)WHO-5 Well-being Index
Levels of emotion-regulationPre-intervention (one week before the intervention)The Emotion Regulation Index for Children and Adolescents (ERICA; Biesecker & Easterbrooks, 2001). It is a 13-item on a five-point Likert scale, from 0 strong disagreement to 5strong agreement where higher scores represent better emotional regulation abilities,
Changes in levels of emotion-regulationPost-intervention (one week afterthe intervention)The Emotion Regulation Index for Children and Adolescents (ERICA; Biesecker & Easterbrooks, 2001). It is a 13-item on a five-point Likert scale, from 0 strong disagreement to 5strong agreement where higher scores represent better emotional regulation abilities,
Level of distressPre-intervention (one week before the intervention)Measured with Profile of Emotional Distress
Changes in level of distressPost-intervention (one week afterthe intervention)Measured with Profile of Emotional Distress
Children Emotional AbilitiesPre-intervention (one week before the intervention)The Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire - Short (Garnefski & Kraaij, 2006) is an 18-item self-report scale that measures a total of nine different cognitive coping strategies, each addressed by two items.
Changes in children Emotional AbilitiesPost-intervention (one week afterthe intervention)The Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire - Short (Garnefski & Kraaij, 2006) is an 18-item self-report scale that measures a total of nine different cognitive coping strategies, each addressed by two items.

Countries

Romania

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026