Skip to content

In-person Versus Online Debriefing in HBB

In-person Versus Online Debriefing in the Simulation Sessions of the Helping Babies Breathe Course: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05257499
Enrollment
49
Registered
2022-02-25
Start date
2021-10-05
Completion date
2022-03-31
Last updated
2025-04-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Neonatal Respiratory Distress

Keywords

Online debriefing, In person debriefing, Helping babies breathe, Debriefing, Simulation training

Brief summary

The objective of this study is to assess the effectiveness of online formative feedback and debriefing on nursing and medical students enrolled in the HBB course in comparison to traditional face-to-face feedback. The working hypothesis is that online feedback and debriefing during hands-on training sessions are as effective as face-to-face feedback and debriefing in teaching clinical skills to medical and nursing students.

Detailed description

Online learning has become an integral part of education, especially during the ongoing COVID19 pandemic that has imposed a limit on live interactions. This observation holds true in the medical education system which uses the flipped classroom model to teach essential practical skills. Studies have shown that this model is associated with improved learning and student satisfaction. In such a model, debriefing and feedback comprise a main part of the teaching process, and these interactions are usually conducted in person. One helpful skill offered to nursing and medical students is Helping Babies Breathe (HBB), which is an evidence-based educational program training first-line birth attendants to initiate effective resuscitation of a newborn in the first minute of life. The investigators propose to incorporate online feedback as part of the HBB course at the American University of Beirut. In this non-inferiority randomized controlled trial, the investigators will study the effectiveness of online formative feedback and debriefing on nursing and medical students enrolled in the HBB course in comparison to traditional face-to-face feedback. The working hypothesis is that internet-based live feedback and debriefing are as effective as face-to-face interactions when teaching clinical skills to nursing and medical students. This work will aid in developing a reliable online curriculum that can be extrapolated to other courses and institutions, thus broadening the reach of medical education in the times of physical distancing.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALOn line debriefing

Online Debriefing in the Simulation Sessions of the Helping Babies Breathe Course

Sponsors

American University of Beirut Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
DOUBLE (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Nurses and medical students

Exclusion criteria

* Attended resuscitation course

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) scoreOne monthThe OSCE of all participants will be videotaped without showing any identifier. Grading of the OSCE will be done by an independent instructor blinded to group assignments. OSCE is graded over 100. Grades equal of higher than 80% are considered for passing.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Student satisfactionOne monthA questionnaire accompanied with a standardized Debriefing Assessment for Simulation in Healthcare Student Version will be used.

Countries

Lebanon

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 6, 2026