Skip to content

Carotid Revascularization With MicroNet Covered Stent Comparing Early Neurological Outcomes With Distal Versus Proximal EPS

Independent Randomized Clinical Trial in Carotid Revascularization With MicroNet Covered Stent (CGuard) Comparing Early Neurological Outcomes With Distal EPS Versus Proximal EPS

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05257161
Acronym
SIBERIA-2
Enrollment
366
Registered
2022-02-25
Start date
2021-11-01
Completion date
2027-01-01
Last updated
2022-02-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Asymptomatic Patients (Stenosis ≥80%), Patients With Aterosclerotic Carotid Stenosis, Symptomatic Patients (Stenosis > 50%)

Keywords

Carotid artery stenting. CGuard stent. Protection Device.

Brief summary

The SIBERIA study demonstrated a clear advantage of CGuard stent implantation over the existing classical stent when using a distal anti-embolic device. At the same time, there is no Level 1 evidence for a difference between the proximal and distal anti-embolic device for the CGuard stent.

Interventions

DEVICEEmboshield NAV6™

Embolic Protection System for Carotid Artery Revascularization ( distal - filter) + stent CGuardTM™

DEVICEMo.Ma™

Embolic Protection System for Carotid Artery Revascularization ( proximal - occlusion) + stent CGuardTM™

Sponsors

Federal State Budgetary Institution, V. A. Almazov Federal North-West Medical Research Centre, of the Ministry of Health
CollaboratorOTHER
Chelyabinsk Regional Clinical Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
Meshalkin Research Institute of Pathology of Circulation
Lead SponsorNETWORK

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
45 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Consecutive patients 45-80 years old accepted for CAS following neurological consultation and qualification for the procedure according to center's routine practice. 2. More than 6-month life expectancy 3. Suitable clinical conditions for performing DW-MRI 4. Written Informed consent approved by the Ethics Committee 5. Subject agrees to all required follow-up procedures and visits

Exclusion criteria

1. Currently enrolled in another investigational device or drug study that has not completed the study or that clinically interferes with the current study endpoints 2. Recent surgical procedure within 30-days before or planned surgery within 30-days after the stenting procedure 3. Hepatic active disease (bilirubin\> 35 mmol / l) or renal insufficiency (serum creatinine \> 2.5 mg/dL or glomerular filtration rate \<60 ml / min) 4. Recent evolving acute stroke within 30-days of study evaluation 5. Myocardial infarction within 72 hours prior to carotid stenting procedure (CPK-MB \> 3 times normal) 6. Female patients of childbearing potential or known to be pregnant 7. Any known factor for potential stroke other than carotid stenosis, such as atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter (paroxysmal, permanent or persistent) or thrombophilia 8. Patient on VKA or new oral anticoagulants

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
determination of ischemic lesions24-48 hoursPostprocedural acute ischemic lesions (MRI)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
MACCEIntraoperatively, and within 48 hours.Death, stroke, and MI

Countries

Russia

Contacts

Primary ContactAndrey A Kaprenko, MD
a_karpenko@meshalkin.ru+79139504100

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026