Skip to content

Effect of Bilateral Erector Spinae Plan Block in Colorectal Surgery

Effect of Bilateral Erector Spinae Plan Block in Colorectal Surgery

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05256953
Enrollment
60
Registered
2022-02-25
Start date
2021-01-25
Completion date
2021-05-01
Last updated
2022-02-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pain, Postoperative

Keywords

Regional anesthesia, Erector spinae plane block, Post-operative analgesia, Laparoscopy, Open surgery, Colorectal surgery

Brief summary

In this study, it was aimed to evaluate the effects erector spina plane block (ESPB) on postoperative opioid consumption in the first 24 hours and pain scores after colorectal surgery.

Detailed description

Colorectal surgery can be applied for many reasons, among these reasons, colorectal cancer (CRC) takes the first place. With the understanding of the pathophysiological effects of analgesics better, the use of regional techniques in providing analgesia for patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery has come to the fore. Depending on the surgical procedure, pain faced by patients is an important problem that must be deal with in the postoperative period. In this study, the hypothesis was determined as Pre-operatively, erector spina plane block (ESPB) performed as part of multimodal analgesia reduces postoperative morphine consumption and pain scores. The patients were divided into two groups : Group ESP (erector spinae plan): In this group, patients will be administered bilateral ESPB (total of 40 ml, %0.25 bupivacaine) in addition to IV morphine patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) for the first 24 postoperative hours. Group GA (general anesthesia): In this group, patients will be administered only IV morphine patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) for the first 24 postoperative hours.

Interventions

PROCEDUREErector spina plane block + general anesthesia

Bilateral-injection ultrasound-guided bilateral erector spinae plane block Pre-operatively, with the patient in the sitting position, 20ml 0.25% bupivacaine will be administered between the T9 spinous process and the erector spinae muscles with the guidance of an ultrasound probe placed on a parasagittal plane. The same procedure was applied bilaterally. Intraoperative analgesia: After anesthesia induction tenoxicam 20 mg IV and 30 min. before the end of the surgery paracetamol (1gr) iv was applied. Postoperative analgesia: IV-PCA: The requested dose will be 20µg/kg morphine, the lock-in time will be 6-10 minutes, the 4-hour limit will be 80% of the total calculated dose. Rescue analgesia was provided with iv tramadol 30 mg boluses whenever the Visual analog scale pain score \>3, (max doses 300 mg/day).

PROCEDUREOnly general anesthesia

Intraoperative analgesia: After anesthesia induction tenoxicam 20 mg IV and 30 min. before the end of the surgery paracetamol (1gr) iv was applied. Postoperative analgesia: IV-PCA: The requested dose will be 20µg/kg morphine, the lock-in time will be 6-10 minutes, the 4-hour limit will be 80% of the total calculated dose. Rescue analgesia was provided with iv tramadol 30 mg boluses whenever the Visual analog scale pain score \>3, (max doses 300 mg/day).

Sponsors

Ondokuz Mayıs University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

The patients were randomly divided into two groups of 30 patients each. In the system where computer generated random numbers (SPSS v23.0, IBM, NewYork, USA) were used, ESP and GA groups were determined at a ratio of 1:1. Sealed and sequentially numbered envelopes were created. One hour before the operation, an experienced anesthesiologist, who was not involved in the intraoperative and postoperative follow-up of the patient and would only perform the block procedure, opened a sealed opaque sealed envelope to learn the group that the patient would be included in. There were two different physicians who performed intraoperative and postoperative follow-up. Both of the follow-up physicians were blind to the patient group. The care provider and investigator were also blinded to the participant.

Intervention model description

Our study is a single center, prospective, randomized controlled, single-blinded, parallel group.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients aged between 18 and 65 years * ASA I , II patients * BMI\<35 kg/m2 (body weight \<100 kg , \>45 kg) * Patients who underwent colorectal surgery

Exclusion criteria

* Patients who underwent abdominoperineal resection * Patients who were evaluated as unsuccessful block in the dermatomal examination performed after the block was applied. * Patients diagnosed with OSAS * Pregnancy and breastfeeding * Contraindication of regional anesthesia (coagulopathy, abnormal INR, thrombocytopenia, infection at the injection site) * Hypersensitivity to local anesthetics or a history of allergy * Patients with a history of opioid use longer than four weeks * Patients with severe psychiatric diseases such as psychosis or dementia that limit cooperation with the patient. * Patients with anatomic deformity ( advanced scoliosis and kyphotic patients. Patients with pectus carinatum and pectus excavatum-like chest deformity ) * Patients who do not want to participate * Patients who have had previous colorectal surgery, excluding diagnostic biopsies * Patients who could not be reached by phone to inquire about their pain score at 3rd month.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Postoperative morphine consumption in the first 24 hoursPostoperative day 1Morphine consumption in the first 24 hours were measured. Patients will be able to request opioids via a PCA device when their VAS score is above 3 at rest and during activity (coughing and deep breathing).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The number of patient requiring rescue analgesiaPostoperative day 1The number of patients who required rescue analgesics were recorded at 0, 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24. hours after extubation
Number of patients with postoperative nausea-vomiting and need of antiemetic usagePostoperative day 1The severity of postoperative nausea and vomitting (PONV) was assessed using a descriptive verbal rating scale at 0, 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 hours after extubation. If a score of 2 or more granisetron 1,5 mg iv will be administered. The PONV scale 0= no nausea, 1= slight nausea 2= moderate nausea, 3= vomiting once, 4= vomiting more than once
Postoperative pain scoresPostoperative month 3Pain status at rest and while activity (coughing and deep breathing) were assessed by VAS scores at 0, 1, 3, 6, 12, 24 hours and 3th month after extubation. The VAS is an 11 point numeric scale which ranges from 0 to 10 at rest and during activity.
Postoperative first oral intake time, first urination, first defecation time, first mobilization time, hospitalization timePostoperative 7 days on an averagePostoperative first oral intake time, first urination, first defecation time, first mobilization time, hospitalization time were recorded
Incidence of pruitusPostoperative day 1Number of patient with pruitus were recorded at 0, 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24. hours
Remifentanil consumption during the surgeryThe remifentanil consumption will be recorded from anesthesia induction until the patient is referred to the recovery unit, up to 160 min]The total amount of remifentanil consumed will be recorded.

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026