Skip to content

Volume Dependent Effect of Pericapsular Nerve Block

Comparison of the Volume Dependent Effect of Pericapsular Nerve Block in Patients Operated for Femur Fracture: A Randomized Prospective Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05256056
Enrollment
60
Registered
2022-02-25
Start date
2022-02-25
Completion date
2022-06-01
Last updated
2022-06-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Femur Fracture, Post Operative Pain

Keywords

pericapsular nerve group block, femur fracture, postoperative analgesia

Brief summary

In PENG block technique, the local anesthetic agent is injected between the psoas tendon and the pubic ramus to block the sensory branches of the nerves which innervates the hip capsule for providing analgesia without causing muscle weakness. Since the PENG block is a facial plane block, it causes a volume dependent distribution. There are a few case reposts and cadaveric studies on volume dependent effect of analgesia and motor weakness of PENG block. In our study, we aimed to evaluate the clinical effects of the volume-dependent efficacy of PENG block.

Detailed description

Femur fracture is the one of the most common case groups and it is seen mostly in the elderly patient population with comorbidities. For these patients, perioperative, postoperative analgesia and early mobilization are important to reduce cardiopulmonary complications and morbidity. Femoral fracture operations are mostly performed under spinal anesthesia especially under unilateral spinal anesthesia to sustain more stable hemodynamics. The lateral decubitus position, which is used for unilateral spinal anesthesia, is a painful position for these patients. Intravenous opioids are used for this procedure, however they have possible side-effects, such as sedation, inhibition of respiratory, lower blood pressure. Because of these reasons, pericapsular nerve block (PENG) has been applied recently to avoid complications. By using PENG block , positioning for spinal anesthesia is easier for patients and anesthesiologists, and postoperative analgesia can be provided. By PENG block, the local anesthetic agent is injected between the psoas tendon and the pubic ramus to block the sensory branches of the nerves innervating the hip capsule, thus providing analgesia in patients, but muscle weakness is not expected. Becacuse PENG block is a facial plane block, it shows a volume dependent distribution. There are a few case reposts and cadaveric studies, which are showing volume depend effect of analgesia and motor weakness of PENG block. In our study, we aimed to evaluate the clinical effects of the volume-dependent efficacy of PENG block.

Interventions

DRUGBupivacain

efficacy of bupivacaine in different volumes

Sponsors

Sisli Hamidiye Etfal Training and Research Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Patients will be randomized using the closed envelope method. While the practitioner knows the interventions to be made, the data collector will collect the data without learning the patient's group.

Intervention model description

Group A patients will be injected with 20 cc of 0.25% Bupivacaine, and Group B patients will be injected with 30 cc of 0.25% Bupivacaine

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Patients who will undergoing hip arthroplasty surgery * Patients over the age of 18 * ASA I-II-III patients * Patients who will be operated under spinal anesthesia

Exclusion criteria

* ASA IV patients, Pregnant women * Patients who are not suitable for spinal anesthesia * Patients diagnosed with Alzheimer's and dementia who cannot cooperate * Patients who are not suitable for peripheral nerve block (patients with infection in the injection area, with local anesthetic allergy, with coagulopathy) * Patients who do not want to participate in the study * Patients under the age of 18 * Patients switched to general anesthesia

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
visual analouge scaleup to 24 hours,the VAS 0 means no pain, 10 means the worst pain possible
pin-prick testup to 20 minutesthe ability to determine the difference between sharp and dull.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
cold sensation testup to 20 minutesfeel the cold: 0, not feel : 1
presence of quadriceps motor blockup to 24 hoursQuadriceps strength will be graded according to a 3-point scale: normal strength = 0 point (extension against resistance); paresis = 1 point (extension against gravity but not against resistance); and paralysis = 2 points (no extension).

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026