Skip to content

Pelvic vs Virtual Reality Simulator

Comparative Study to Determine Proper Sequence of Simulation Training Pelvic Versus Virtual Reality Simulator

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05255614
Enrollment
20
Registered
2022-02-24
Start date
2022-02-01
Completion date
2022-08-01
Last updated
2023-08-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Laparoscopic Training

Keywords

Simulation training, Pelvic trainer, Virtual reality Simulator

Brief summary

The aim of this study is to evaluate the proper sequence of Pelvic trainer and VR simulator training in order to improve gynecological laparoscopic skills and assess training levels.

Detailed description

In this study, the investigators will determine the proper sequence of simulation training. Pelvic Trainer Versus Virtual reality Simulator in order to improve laparoscopic skills of residents with no or little previous laparoscopic experience. * This study will compare the proper sequence of simulation training. Pelvic Trainer Versus Virtual reality Simulator of two groups: Group A versus Group B. * Group A will start training on the pelvic trainer (training on educational intervention 1) and assessment will be via assessment via a checklist (test 1). Then at a later time, they will be trained on VR simulator (Sim Surgery) (educational intervention 2) and assessment will be via Electronic auto assessment via the Simulator (test 2). * Group B will start training on the VR simulator (Sim Surgery) (educational intervention 2) and assessment will be via Electronic auto assessment via the Simulator (test 2). Then at a later time, they will be trained on the pelvic trainer (training on educational intervention 1) and assessment will be via assessment via a checklist (test 1).

Interventions

LapSim is a device designed by Surgical Science Device & software at Swedan

DEVICEPelvic trainer:

Video-box trainers include a box with a lid and holes cut on the lid for the trocar's insertion. A laparoscope inside the box is connected with a digital camera and provides video output to a monitor on which the trainees are watching their own movements, while performing the teaching task. Laparoscopic instruments, such as laparoscopic graspers and laparoscopic scissors are inserted through the trocars into the box, where the tasks are taught

Sponsors

Cairo University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
26 Years to 29 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* All the residents in Obstetrics and Gynecology department who have no or little previous laparoscopic experience

Exclusion criteria

* Residents who have previous good laparoscopic experiences. * Age below 26 or Above 29 years

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
assessment of time needed to accomplish the tests before and after pelvic trainer6 monthsassessment of time needed to accomplish the tests before and after pelvic trainer
assessment of time needed to accomplish the tests before and after victual reality simulator6 monthsassessment of time needed to accomplish the tests before and after victual reality simulator

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 7, 2026