Skip to content

Precision Medicine Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Molecular Tumor Board Assisted Care to Usual Care

Precision Medicine Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Molecular Tumor Board Assisted Care to Usual Care

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05254795
Acronym
PRiMAL
Enrollment
659
Registered
2022-02-24
Start date
2022-04-13
Completion date
2026-12-22
Last updated
2026-03-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Keywords

Molecular tumor board

Brief summary

This trial will compare Molecular Tumor Board (MTB) assisted care to usual care for patients who have newly diagnosed histologically or cytologically confirmed stage IIb-IV Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) and are planning to undergo treatment for their cancer.

Interventions

OTHERMolecular tumor board assisted care

Participants in this group will obtain recommendations for care from the molecular tumor board.

Sponsors

Timothy Mullett
Lead SponsorOTHER
Eli Lilly and Company
CollaboratorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 120 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Clinically suspected or histologically confirmed stage IIb-IV NSCLC who are planning to undergo treatment * No prior systemic therapies for NSCLC, with the exception of adjuvant therapy for early stage NSCLC. Prior surgery and/or radiation is allowed. * Ability to understand and the willingness to sign a written informed consent document.

Exclusion criteria

* Uncontrolled intercurrent illness including, but not limited to, ongoing or active infection, symptomatic congestive heart failure, unstable angina pectoris, cardiac arrhythmia, or psychiatric illness/social situations that would limit compliance with targeted therapy, in the opinion of the treating physician. * Pregnancy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall survival1 yearOverall survival 1 year survival between individuals with stage IIb-IV NSCLC who receive MTB assisted care to those who receive usual care.
Change in quality of life (QOL)At enrollment, 8 weeks, and 12 weeks.Quality of life will be assessed via the FACT-L (The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Lung). FACT-L has 5 areas of measurement: physical wellbeing, social/family wellbeing, emotional wellbeing, functional wellbeing, and an additional concerns list of problems specific to lung cancer. Areas are measured on a 5-point Likert-type scale of 0-4. The FACT-L subscales can be scored to yield a total score, subscale scores, as well as the Trial Outcome Index (TOI), which reflects the physical wellbeing, functional wellbeing, and lung cancer symptom subscales. TOI scores range from 0-84, with a higher score reflecting better QOL. Total FACT-G scores (physical, social, emotional, and functional wellbeing subscales) range from 0-108, with higher scores reflecting better QOL. The lung cancer subscale (i.e., additional concerns subscale) can range from 0-28 (only 7 items are scored), with higher scores reflecting better QOL.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall survival1 yearComparison of overall survival between individuals with stage IIb-IV NSCLC who receive MTB assisted care to those who receive usual care
Change in guideline concordant care8 weeks, 12 weeks, and 1 yearComparison of guideline concordant care (specifically receiving next generation sequencing (NGS) testing and treatments based on identified mutations) between individuals with stage IIb-IV NSCLC who receive MTB assisted care to those who receive usual care.
Change in satisfaction with treatmentAt enrollment, 8 weeks, and 12 weeks.To compare satisfaction with treatment between individuals with stage IIb-IV NSCLC who receive MTB assisted care to those who receive usual care, including financial, psychosocial, and physical measures of satisfaction using the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) - Treatment Satisfaction - General (TSG) (version 4). The FACIT-TSG is an 8-item questionnaire, with each item score ranging from 0 ("not at all") to 4 ("very much"). Total scores range from 0 to 32 with higher scores indicating greater satisfaction with treatment.

Countries

United States

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORTimothy Mullett, MD

University of Kentucky

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 29, 2026