Skip to content

Triple Antigen vs Monoantigen Immunotherapy for Warts

Triple Intralesional Antigen Immunotherapy Versus Monoantigen in the Treatment of Multiple Recalcitrant Warts

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05254561
Enrollment
160
Registered
2022-02-24
Start date
2020-11-20
Completion date
2021-11-15
Last updated
2022-02-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Triple Intralesional Immunotherapy Combination in Multiple Recalcitrant Warts

Keywords

triple intralesional immunotherapy, Warts, tuberculin purified protein derivative, Candida antigen, Measles-Mumps-Rubella vaccine, combination immunotherapy

Brief summary

Warts can be resistant to treatment or return despite the use of many therapeutic modalities. Combining immunotherapy might contribute to better response rates, particularly in recalcitrant warts, which is a real therapeutic challenge. The purpose of this study was to assess the effectiveness and safety of a triple intralesional immunotherapy combination composed of PPD, Candida antigen and MMR versus either agent alone in the management of multiple recalcitrant warts.

Detailed description

This study included 160 patients with multiple (\>3 warts) recalcitrant (at least 6 months duration and who did not respond to at least 2 treatment modalities) warts of different sites, size and duration, with or without distant warts after approval of the Institutional Review Board of Faculty of medicine, Zagazig university. They were randomly assigned to one of four groups (each with 40 patients): PPD, Candida antigen, MMR, or combination of the 3 antigens. Injections into the biggest wart were repeated every two weeks until clearance or for a total of five sessions.

Interventions

BIOLOGICALIntralesional antigen immunotherapy

Randomized double-blinded comparative effectiveness and safety clinical trial

Sponsors

Zagazig University
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Masking description

Double masking

Intervention model description

Parallel assignment

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
10 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Multiple (\> 3 warts) recalcitrant (at least 6 months duration and who did not respond to at least 2 treatment modalities) warts of different sites, size and duration

Exclusion criteria

1. Patients with acute febrile illness or past history of asthma. 2. Allergic skin disorders such as generalized eczema and urticaria. 3. Past history of meningitis or convulsions. 4. Pregnancy or lactation.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Overall complete response of both treated and distant wartswithin 12 weeks of starting treatment sessions (up to 1 month after the last session, maximum 5 sessions)
Immediate adverse effectsduring and till 20 minutes after intralesional injection immunotherapy

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Distant wart clearancewithin 12 weeks of starting sessions
Time to complete clearancewithin 12 weeks of starting therapy
late adverse effectsafter each session and till the end of sessions and 6 months-follow-up period
RecurrenceFor 6 months after complete response

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026