Skip to content

The DETECT Project

The Drug Eluting Devices French Safety Survey

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05254106
Acronym
DETECT
Enrollment
250000
Registered
2022-02-24
Start date
2011-11-01
Completion date
2024-12-31
Last updated
2022-04-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Femoropopliteal Atheromatous Lesions

Keywords

Femoropopliteal atheromatous lesions, endovascular revascularization, paclitaxel drug-eluting devices

Brief summary

This study aims to assess the all-cause mortality at 2 years of patients treated by a paclitaxel drug-eluting devices or non-drug-eluting devices after an endovascular femoropopliteal artery revascularization based on the French National Healthcare Data System (SNDS).

Detailed description

Endovascular intervention is considered as a first-line treatment for femoropopliteal atheromatous lesions. During the 2000s, the superiority of auto-expandable stent compared to percutaneous transluminal angioplasty had been demonstrated, in terms of effectiveness. Over the past decade, paclitaxel drug-eluting balloons or stents were successfully assessed in order to prevent intimal hyperplasia and to treat restenosis. Nevertheless, in 2018, Katsanos and al. reported in a meta-analysis a higher risk of death at 2 and 5 years for patients treated by a paclitaxel drug-eluting balloons or stents versus non-drug-eluting devices. This study presents many limitations despite being performed as a systematic review of randomized clinical trials. Since then, several studies have been conducted without any statistical trends in favor of a higher mortality in patients treated by drug-eluting stents or drug-coated balloons. Analysis based on US or Germany databases in tens of thousands of patients has been published but individual data were unavailable. In France, there is no national report about the safety of paclitaxel drug-eluting devices prescribed in the case of endovascular femoropopliteal artery treatment. Therefore, this study aims to compare the risk of all-cause death of patients treated by paclitaxel-eluting devices versus non-drug-eluting devices in this indication at a national-scale using real-life data from SNDS. This analysis of the SNDS database will allow (i) to identify all patients across France treated by endovascular intervention for a femoropopliteal revascularization and to know precisely the medical device used; (ii) to reduce confusion bias based on the characterization of patients thanks to their data of medical follow-up, treatment, hospitalization and LTD (long-term condition); (iii) to document their care pathway, especially drugs delivery and diagnosis associated to possible hospitalization, or to all-cause death, in order to compare the 1-, 2- and 5-years prognosis according to the medical device used.

Interventions

DEVICELower limb artery revascularization with paclitaxel-eluting device

Lower limb artery revascularization with paclitaxel-eluting stent and/or paclitaxel-coated balloon

Sponsors

French-Speaking Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Society Support
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Boston Scientific Corporation
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Cook Research Incorporated
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Nantes University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

* age ≥ 18 years old on day of hospital admission for the hereafter related surgical procedure * Affiliated member to the French Social Security system * Admitted in a French hospital, public or private, between October 2011 and December 2019 * Benefitting from an endovascular femoropopliteal surgical procedure coded with ≥ 1 of the 9 codes of the Common Classification of Medical Procedures (EEAF001, EEAF002, EEAF003, EEAF004, EEAF005, EEAF006, EEPF001, EEPF002, EELF002) * Associated to the reimbursement by the health insurance scheme for one device of interest cited in the SAP (statistical analyses plan)

Exclusion criteria

\-

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Midterm mortality after the procedure of interest2 yearsAll-cause death

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Short-term mortality after the procedure of interest1 yearAll-cause death
Long-term mortality after the procedure of interest5 yearsAll-cause death
Adverse events after the procedure of interest1 year, 2 years, 5 yearsHospitalization for coronary artery disease (myocardial infarction or coronary revascularization), cerebrovascular accident, transient ischemic attack, lower limb amputation (minor and major), a major adverse cardiovascular event (define as the composite of death, myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular accident, transient ischemic attack, major amputation), a major adverse limb event (define as the composite of a lower limb revascularization or a major amputation) or all-cause mortality.

Countries

France

Contacts

Primary ContactCHU Nantes Nantes University Hospital
bp-prom-regl@chu-nantes.fr

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 8, 2026