Low Back Pain
Conditions
Keywords
Isokinetic training, Virtual reality training, Cross sectional area, muscle thickness, inflammatory biomarkers, chronic low back pain
Brief summary
OBJECTIVE: To find and compare the effects of isokinetic training and virtual reality training on pain intensity, trunk muscle strength, radiographical (muscle cross-sectional area and muscle thickness), and biochemical effects in chronic low back pain (LBP) patients.
Detailed description
OBJECTIVE: To find and compare the effects of isokinetic training and virtual reality training on pain intensity, trunk muscle strength, radiographical (muscle cross-sectional area and muscle thickness), and biochemical effects in chronic low back pain (LBP) patients. METHODS: Randomized, double-blinded controlled study was conducted on 60 LBP patients and they were divided into isokinetic training (IKT; n=20), virtual reality training (VRT; n=20), and a control group (n=20). The VRT group received virtual training for core muscles of the trunk, the IKT group received training for trunk muscles through an Isokinetic dynamometer and the control group received conventional trunk balance exercises. Pain intensity (visual analog scale -VAS), trunk muscle strength, radiographical (muscle cross-sectional area through Magnetic resonance imaging - MRI & muscle thickness through Ultrasound - US), and biochemical (CRP, TNF-α, IL-2, IL-4, IL-6) variables were measured at baseline and after 4 weeks (short term effect) of training.
Interventions
DEVICEIsokinetic training
The knees were flexed slightly at 15 degrees, and the fixation straps were tied around the popliteus, thigh, pelvis, chest and scapula to prevent the tricky movements.
DEVICEVirtual reality training
Training was given in the sitting position which provides challenges to the balance activities of the participant. The game which was used in the current study was a shooting game, which consists of the subject sitting on the virtual platform and visualizing the game on the display screen. The game was executed and controlled by moving the trunk back and forth and left and right according to the signs. Participants can perform all the six movements of their spine within their pain limits. The level of difficulty of the exercises was increased by graded activity, in which the activities were gradually getting difficult and harder as participants required more muscle activity and movement.
OTHERExercises
They performed these exercises 10-15 reps/day for 5 days per week for 4 weeks. Stretching was focused on each muscle group for 3 repetitions for 10 seconds per muscle group (Hamstring, Hip flexors and Lumbar Extensors).7 A home-based exercise protocol was prescribed to all the subjects to perform at home. All the subjects in three groups were undergone hot pack therapy for 20 mins and ultrasound with a frequency of 1 Mhz and intensity of 1.5 W/cm2 in continuous form for five minutes.
Sponsors
Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)
Masking description
Due to the design and settings of the study, it was not possible to blind the treating therapist involved in the study. The subject and the therapist who was assessing the outcomes at baseline and after 4 weeks were blinded. Hence, the treating and assessing therapists were different persons and the assessing therapist remains blinded to the subject's treatment group. Subjects were instructed not to disclose their study procedures and treatment protocol with fellow-subjects and the assessing therapist.
Intervention model description
The study was a double-blinded randomized control study and the subjects were randomized and allocated equally according to the computer random table method in a 1:1:1 ratio in three groups.
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
18 Years to 25 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* University male football players * Age group of 18 - 25 years * chronic (≥3 months) LBP, * 4 to 8 pain intensity in visual analog scale (VAS).
Exclusion criteria
* Participants with severe musculoskeletal, neural, somatic, and psychiatric conditions, * Waiting for spine surgery, * Having alcohol or drug abuse, * Involved in other weight and balance training programs. * Participants with other soft tissue injuries, fractures in the lower limbs and pelvic bone, deformities.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Pain Intensity | At Baseline | The pain intensity was measured by visual analog scale (VAS) which consist of a 10 cm horizontal line representing one end with no pain at all and the other end with as bad as possible it could be. Each subject was asked to enter in the line as per his pain perception at rest and the score was measured by the distance on the line. The reliability and validity of VAS in application of musculoskeletal conditions was good. |
| Trunk flexor & extensor muscle strength | At Baseline | The trunk flexor and extensor muscles' peak torque was measured by using isokinetic dynamometer. The participant was positioned in standing position and wrapped the lower extremities with Velcro straps to prevent trick movements. Three measurements were taken at 900 per second for trunk flexors and extensors and the average value was considered for data analysis. The reliability and validity of this method of application in low back pain condition was good. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Para spinal CSA | Baseline and after 4 weeks | Cross sectional area (CSA) is an area exposed by cut through at right angles to an axis. T2 weighted images of para spinal muscles (PM: Psoas Major, QL: Quadratus Lumborum, Mf: Multifidus and ES: Erector Spinae) CSA were taken using a 3-T MRI-scanner (Closed MRI system, Siemens, Hamburg, Germany) with a slice thickness of 5 mm. The subjects were placed in a supine position with a pillow kept under the knees to maintain the normal lordosis of the lumbar spine. The CSA at the level of L3-L4 was selected because of their maximal size at this level. |
| Muscle thickness | Baseline and after 4 weeks | Muscle size is considered as the thickness of muscle and the thickness of Multifidus muscle was measured by the diagnostic ultrasound device (Hitachi Ultrasound, Tokyo, Japan) which is the most reliable and valid method of measurement. The thickness of multifidus was taken from the left and right side of the L4 and L5 level. The subject lies in a prone position with a pillow under the abdomen to maintain lordosis. The thickness of the muscle was measured by measuring the distance between the most superficial portion of the facet joint and the plane between the muscle and the skin. |
| Inflammatory Biomarker | Baseline and after 4 weeks | Subject's blood samples of 10 ml were taken in sterile tubes between 08:00 - 10:00 am. Serum was separated and centrifuged, which was frozen at -700 C and stored. Serum levels of CRP, TNF-α, IL-2, IL-4, IL-6 were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) technique. The kit was used according to the guidelines of the manufacturer. The lower and upper limits of detection were computed for each assay, and the average percentages of samples were reported for statistical analysis. |
Countries
Saudi Arabia
Outcome results
None listed