Skip to content

Exercise Strategies for Bedside Cases During Hospitalization

Comparison of Three Types of Bedside Exercise Programs on Physical Functions of Hospitalized Patients

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05252286
Enrollment
30
Registered
2022-02-23
Start date
2022-03-15
Completion date
2023-12-31
Last updated
2022-03-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Disability Physical, Hospitalization

Keywords

Hospital-Associated Disability, self-exercise

Brief summary

Patients after hospital admission would experience the functional decline, so-called Hospital-Associated Disability. This condition could not only impact the patient health function but pose a burden on the family, even more consuming of medical resource in the country. Therefore, in addition to routine rehabilitation program, various bedside exercise programs are provided as an adjunct therapy to prevent functional declination and improve physical mobility for a patient after hospital admission. The aims of the study are conducted to compare the effect of three various bedside exercise programs (exercise based on watching video, oral education and paper sheet) on physical mobility among the hospitalized patients. This is single-blind randomized control study and patients recruited from Tzu-Chi medical center in eastern Taiwan are ranged from 30 to 90 years old. All participants are randomly assigned to three groups (watching video, oral education and paper sheet). Patients in watching video group are provided with theirs 3 to 5 poor physical performance video recorded on the tablet or mobile phone during the rehabilitation program. The other two groups are provided oral education and paper sheet exercise program, respectively. All three groups patients conduct their bedside exercise programs when they return their ward. Physical performance tests are evaluated before the intervention and one or two days before discharge by a physical therapist blinded the groups of patient .

Interventions

Watching video In this group, when the patient conducts their rehabilitation exercise, the therapist would record the poor physical movement pattern from his/her performance by using the mobile phone or tablet. The patients will be provided with watching video exercise, containing 3-5 items of their poor physical performance, selected by the therapist as a feedback to let the patient practice when they return their bedside ward after their rehabilitation time. The content of video-watching exercise program will be changed or modified once weekly as the patient improve the physical movement performance.

OTHERpaper group

In the paper sheet group, the therapist will give three to five poor movement patterns, selected from the patient conducting their rehabilitation program, to practice when returning bedside ward.

OTHERoral education group

the patient only receives the oral exercise education about how to improve their physical performance during their hospital stay.

Sponsors

Buddhist Tzu Chi General Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
30 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Functional dependence evaluated by Barthel Index 2. Patients needed to rehabilitation program referred by medical doctor during hospitalization 3. Be able to follow command and assessment

Exclusion criteria

1. Impaired cognition 2. Psychological problem from medical diagnosis 3. Having a potential cardiac risk or severe disease diagnosis from medical doctor

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Barthel Index (BI)Up to four weeksThe investigators will use the BI as the primary outcome measure in this study to evaluate activity of daily living at baseline before intervention, one week after intervention, and the time at discharge. BI is scored 0 to 100, the higher score and the better functional performance.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB)four weeksThe investigators will use the SPPB as the secondary outcome measure in this study to evaluate the lower extremity functioning and physical mobility at baseline before intervention, one week after intervention, and the time at discharge. SPPB is scored 0 to 12, the higher score and the better physical mobility.
Time Up and Go (TUG)Up to four weeksThe investigators will use the TUG as the secondary outcome measure in this study to evaluate the balance mobility at baseline before intervention, one week after intervention, and the time at discharge. TUG is recorded as the seconds, the shorter timing and the better balance function.
de Morton Mobility Index (DEMMI)Up to four weeksThe investigators will use the DEMMI as the secondary outcome measure in this study to evaluate the physical mobility at baseline before intervention, one week after intervention, and the time at discharge. The DEMMI consists of 15 items with score 0-100, and the higher score, the better performane.
Hand-held dynamometerUp to four weeksThe investigators will use the hand-held dynamometer as the secondary outcome measure in this study to evaluate the muscle strength at baseline before intervention, one week after intervention, and the time at discharge.

Countries

Taiwan

Contacts

Primary ContactJia-Ching Chen
chenjiaching0608@gmail.com886-3-8565301
Backup ContactYi-wen Huang
a13521002@gmail.com886-38561825

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026