Skip to content

Efficacy and Safety of Benralizumab in Patients With Eosinophilic Gastritis and/or Gastroenteritis (The HUDSON GI Study)

A Multi-center, Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel-group, Placebo-controlled 3-Part Phase 3 Study to Demonstrate the Efficacy and Safety of Benralizumab in Patients With Eosinophilic Gastritis and/or Gastroenteritis (The HUDSON GI Study)

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05251909
Acronym
HUDSON GI
Enrollment
12
Registered
2022-02-23
Start date
2022-01-18
Completion date
2024-02-13
Last updated
2025-07-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Eosinophilic Gastritis, Eosinophilic Gastroenteritis

Keywords

Benralizumab, Eosinophilic Gastritis, Gastroenteritis, Intestinal Diseases, Stomach Diseases, Gastrointestinal Diseases, Digestive System Diseases

Brief summary

This is a 3-part study. Part A is randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled and includes patients with eosinophilic gastritis and/or duodenal-only disease. After completing Part A, participants can continue to Part C - open-label benralizumab treatment period. Following the decision to close enrollment, patients in both Part A and Part C will be given the option to proceed to 6-months of open-label benralizumab treatment in Part D.

Interventions

BIOLOGICALBenralizumab

Benralizumab is a humanized, afucosylated, monoclonal antibody that binds specifically to the IL-5Rα on the target cell and thus directly depletes eosinophils through antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity. Benralizumab has been widely approved for treatment of asthma.

BIOLOGICALPlacebo

Placebo will be injected as a comparator to injection with Benralizumab to examine effect on both the signs and symptoms of EG/EGE and the underlying eosinophilic inflammation, with dual primary outcome variables

Sponsors

AstraZeneca
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Masking description

This is a parallel-group efficacy and safety study with 2 arms that are participant and investigator blinded, with an open-label extension.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
12 Years to 130 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Aged \>= 12 years of age at the time of signing the ICF or informed consent or assent form. * Confirmed diagnosis of EG/EGE for at least 3 months prior to screening. * Baseline Eosinophilic gastritis, with or without duodenitis, or eosinophilic duodenitis alone confirmed by biopsy with a gastric count of ≥30 eosinophils/hpf in at least 5 hpfs and/or duodenal eosinophil count ≥30 eosinophils/hpf in at least 3 hpfs without any other cause for the gastrointestinal eosinophilia. * Symptoms including at least moderate abdominal pain, nausea, bloating, early satiety, and/or loss of appetite * Must be adherent to daily PRO assessments including at least 8 of 14 symptom assessments in the 14 days prior to randomization * If on background medications for EG/EGE, the medications should be stable at least 4 weeks prior to the run-in period. * Willing and able to comply with all study procedures and visit schedule including follow-up visits * Women of childbearing potential must agree to use a highly effective form of birth control (confirmed by the Investigator) from randomization throughout the study duration and within 12 weeks after last dose if IP.

Exclusion criteria

* Other gastrointestinal disorders such as active Helicobacter pylori infection, history of achalasia, esophageal varices, Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis, inflammatory bowel disease, or celiac disease. * Hypereosinophilic syndrome or eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis. * Current malignancy, or history of malignancy, except for patients who have had basal cell, localized squamous cell carcinoma of the skin, or in situ carcinoma of the cervix are eligible provided that the patient is in remission and curative therapy was completed at least 12 months prior to the date of informed consent. * History of anaphylaxis to any biologic therapy or vaccine. * Current active liver disease. * Helminth parasitic infection diagnosed within 24 weeks prior to the date informed that has not been treated with or has failed to respond to standard of care therapy. * Known immunodeficiency disorder including testing positive for HIV. * Concomitant use of immunosuppressive medication. * Receipt of live attenuated vaccines 30 days prior to date of informed consent or assent. * Receipt of inactive vaccines within 7 days of informed consent or assent. * Initiation or change of a food-elimination diet regimen or re-introduction of a previously eliminated food group from 6 weeks prior to start of the run-in period and unable or unwilling to remain on a stable diet until the completion of Part A and C. * Currently pregnant or breast-feeding.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Proportion of Patients With a Histologic Response at Week 24at week 24the proportion of patients achieving a histological response at Week 24, is defined as below: * 6 eosinophils/hpf in the stomach for the patients with only gastric disease at baseline. * 6 eosinophils/hpf in the stomach and ≤15 eosinophils/hpf in the duodenum for the patients with gastric + duodenal disease at baseline. * 15 eosinophils/hpf in the duodenum for the patients with only duodenal disease at baseline.
Change From Baseline in SAGED Score at Week 24at week 24The Symptom Assessment for Gastrointestinal Eosinophilic Diseases (SAGED) instrument was developed to measure gastrointestinal symptoms in participants diagnosed with EG/EGE. It is a daily diary completed by participants each evening from screening until week 76 to record symptoms during the past 24 hours. Severity for each concept is assessed using an 11-point numerical rating scale (0 = 'none' and 10 = 'worst imaginable'). The total SAGED score (range 0-50) is calculated as a 14-day mean of the sum of individual severity items of abdominal pain, nausea, bloating, early satiety and loss of appetite daily. Higher scores indicate greater symptom severity. Three additional items are collected that aren't part of the total SAGED score and are considered separately: severity of vomiting, severity of diarrhoea and frequency of vomiting. Change in SAGED score at week 24 is the week 24 score (study days 155 to 168) minus the baseline score (study days -14 to -1).

Countries

Brazil, Italy, Japan, Netherlands, Poland, Spain, Ukraine, United States, Vietnam

Participant flow

Recruitment details

A total of 34 participants were screened. Of those, 12 participants were randomised to either the treatment (6 participants) or placebo (participants) arms of the double-blinded treatment period.

Pre-assignment details

All participants complete a 4-week to 8-week run-in period during which inclusion/exclusion criteria was assessed.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Benralizumab
Patients received benralizumab 30mg every 4 weeks for the 24 weeks treatment period
6
Placebo
Patients received matching Placebo every 4 weeks for the 24 weeks treatment period
6
Total12

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Open Label ExtensionSubjects who discontinued treatment with study drug in OLE but completed study follow-up11

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicBenralizumabPlaceboTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
5 Participants4 Participants9 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
5 Participants4 Participants9 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
5 Participants1 Participants6 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
1 Participants5 Participants6 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 60 / 60 / 9
other
Total, other adverse events
6 / 63 / 66 / 9
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 60 / 60 / 9

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in SAGED Score at Week 24

The Symptom Assessment for Gastrointestinal Eosinophilic Diseases (SAGED) instrument was developed to measure gastrointestinal symptoms in participants diagnosed with EG/EGE. It is a daily diary completed by participants each evening from screening until week 76 to record symptoms during the past 24 hours. Severity for each concept is assessed using an 11-point numerical rating scale (0 = 'none' and 10 = 'worst imaginable'). The total SAGED score (range 0-50) is calculated as a 14-day mean of the sum of individual severity items of abdominal pain, nausea, bloating, early satiety and loss of appetite daily. Higher scores indicate greater symptom severity. Three additional items are collected that aren't part of the total SAGED score and are considered separately: severity of vomiting, severity of diarrhoea and frequency of vomiting. Change in SAGED score at week 24 is the week 24 score (study days 155 to 168) minus the baseline score (study days -14 to -1).

Time frame: at week 24

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
BenralizumabChange From Baseline in SAGED Score at Week 24-9.59 scoreStandard Error 7.26
PlaceboChange From Baseline in SAGED Score at Week 24-13.69 scoreStandard Error 4.37
Primary

Proportion of Patients With a Histologic Response at Week 24

the proportion of patients achieving a histological response at Week 24, is defined as below: * 6 eosinophils/hpf in the stomach for the patients with only gastric disease at baseline. * 6 eosinophils/hpf in the stomach and ≤15 eosinophils/hpf in the duodenum for the patients with gastric + duodenal disease at baseline. * 15 eosinophils/hpf in the duodenum for the patients with only duodenal disease at baseline.

Time frame: at week 24

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
BenralizumabProportion of Patients With a Histologic Response at Week 245 Participants
PlaceboProportion of Patients With a Histologic Response at Week 240 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026