Skip to content

Comparative Study Efficacy and Safety of of Activated Versus Non-Activated PRP

Evaluation of Activated Platelet Rich Plasma Versus Non-Activated Platelet Rich Plasma in Alopecia Areata

Status
Completed
Phases
Early Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05251831
Enrollment
40
Registered
2022-02-23
Start date
2020-02-01
Completion date
2021-03-30
Last updated
2022-02-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Alopecia Areata

Brief summary

This was comparative prospective study conducted on 40 subjects, diagnosed with alopecia areata of 40 the scalp, carried in a period from February 2020 and March 2021

Detailed description

Alopecia areata is a common recurrent T cell-mediated autoimmune-induced non-scarring hair loss with not fully understood pathogenesis which affects nearly 2% of the general population during lifetime. The course of the disease is unpredictable and currently, no treatment is available for complete cure or prevention. Platelet-rich plasma is an autologous blood-derived product which widely spread in the last decades for the treatment of different dermatological conditions including different hair disorders. The aim of this work was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of activated platelet-rich plasma in comparison to non-activated platelet-rich plasma in the treatment of alopecia areata.

Interventions

Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) therapy uses injections of a concentration of a patient's own platelets.

Sponsors

Al-Azhar University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

The 40 patients with alopecia areata will be divided into 2 groups: Group A: 20 patients will be treated by activated PRP with Calcium chloride (CaCl2). Those patients will be treated with an intradermal injection. Group B: 20 patients will be treated by non-activated PRP through intradermal injection

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
19 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. Patients diagnosed clinically and dermatoscopically as Alopecia areata of the scalp (uni- or 50 multilocularis). 2. Age ranged between 18-50 years in both sex.

Exclusion criteria

1. Previously treated patients. 2. Pregnant women. 3 Patients with hematological disorders. 4\. Local infection at the site. 5. Patients with Hemoglobin \<10 g/dL and Platelet count \<105/µL. 6. Patients suffer from chronic and psychiatric diseases. 7.Age below 18years or age above 50 years ago.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Hair length in group Athree monthsPRP as treatment option was in indicating its anti-inflammatory properties. 183 PRP effective in AA through anti-inflammatory mechanisms owing to its ability to suppress Monocyte 184 chemotactic protein-1 and owing to the presence of Transforming growth factor (β1 and β2) as was 185 shown by Amable and El-Sharkavy with coauthors

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Hair length in Group Bfive monthsconfirm that PRP is safe effective and well tolerated by 207 patients treatment modality for Alopecia areata. Beside this such method is cost effective as no need 208 any expensive tools for preparation and can be done in outpatients clinics easily.

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026