Skip to content

A Mixed-Method Evaluation of the Impact of Social Risk Screening on Uptake of Social Assistance

A Mixed-Method Evaluation of the Impact of Social Risk Screening on Uptake of Social Assistance

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05251311
Enrollment
3949
Registered
2022-02-22
Start date
2022-04-19
Completion date
2023-09-22
Last updated
2024-11-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Low-income Populations, Social Determinants of Health

Brief summary

Children are disproportionately affected by the rise in poverty rates in the United States. Economic hardships can compromise child development, overall health, and the ability to succeed in school and in life. The current economic recession and racial disparities underscored by COVID19 have magnified this impact on children and hastened the already rapid growth of screening protocols for social risk factors- such as food and housing insecurity, financial strain, and unsafe environments-within pediatric health care. However, it remains unclear what effect standardized screening has on family perception of and engagement with resources. Current implementation momentum for screening protocols is outpacing research, and is raising concern among patient advocates for unintended harm-alienating families for fear of stigma or worse, and overpromising services that may not exist. Through a rigorous mixed-method approach, the proposed study will explore the impact of screening on acceptance, perception, and engagement with social resources among families with children. Furthermore, by leveraging the new technology of resource mapping as the method of resource referral, this study will provide insight regarding its effectiveness as a social needs assistance strategy. The knowledge gained will provide guidance for policymakers and other healthcare systems on how to integrate social risk interventions into healthcare delivery in order to maximize the benefit to children and families.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALSocial Risk Screening Tool

Investigators will use an adapted version of the evidence-based WE CARE screening tool, which assesses need in the 5 domains most frequently requested by our patient population: housing, transportation, child care, food security, and household heat and electricity. This tool was selected as it is evidence-based, takes fewer than 5 minutes to complete, is written at a 3rd grade reading level, and allows for differentiation between social risk and caregiver desire for assistance, as well as areas of emergency need.

OTHERElectronic Resource Map

All participants will receive access to an electronic, geographically searchable resource map hosted on Aunt Bertha

BEHAVIORALResource Menu

Participants randomized to this experimental arm will receive a social resource menu tool, which assess desire for social resources.

Sponsors

Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
SINGLE (Caregiver)

Masking description

Social worker that follows up with each participant will be blinded to randomization arm

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 100 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Caregivers presenting with a child to the pediatric clinical setting * Child age 0-25

Exclusion criteria

* Engaged in complex care management services * Child in critical condition * Presenting to clinical setting specifically for social work intervention

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Resource Impact30 daysperceived impact of resource use on social need measured by using a modified version of the WE CARE screening tool
Resource Engagement By Domain30 daysnumber of resources saved by domain
Resource Utilization30 daysrates of resource utilization
Resource Uptake By Search30 daystotal number of searches
Resource Uptake By Domain30 daysnumber of searches by domain
Resource Engagement By Time30 daystime spent on site
Resource Engagement By Saves30 daysnumber of resources saved

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Perceived impact of screening on resource perceptionup to 45 daysQualitative semi-structured interviews
Perceived impact of screening on resource acceptanceup to 45 daysQualitative semi-structured interviews

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 5, 2026