Crowding, Tooth
Conditions
Keywords
Corticision, Visual analog scale, Mild and moderate crowding, Surgical blade, Pain, Discomfort
Brief summary
The duration of orthodontic treatment is one of the exacerbation causes of orthodontic pain. Several methods have been suggested to reduce the duration of orthodontic treatment classified to surgical and non-surgical methods. Researches used minimally invasive surgical methods like corticision, piezocesion, disicion, micro-osteoperforation, and piezopuncture indicated that most of these methods can accelerate dental movement by 20 - 40% without causing additional pain as a result of using those methods. Applying corticision on the lower anterior teeth using a surgical blade and a hammer may accelerate tooth alignment during orthodontic treatment. This study consists of two groups, patients will be randomly assigned to one of these two groups.
Detailed description
Pain is defined as an unpleasant emotional sensory experience associated with actual or potential harm. It was mentioned as one of the most common complaints related to orthodontic treatment, and around 65-95% of patients undergoing orthodontic treatment suffer from various degrees of pain. Corticision is one of the minimally invasive surgical procedures that is not associated with flap lifting. It was used to accelerate tooth movement in animals and case report studies. Its application on humans may aggravate their fear and anxiety towards the pain that may accompany this technique. No study in the literature has been searched in patient perception of pain, discomfort, levels of acceptance and satisfaction accompanied corticision application application, but in this study, these previous variables accompanied corticision technique have been studied on crowded lower anterior teeth cases which are one of the most common types of malocclusions.
Interventions
PROCEDURECorticision
Corticision will be performed to enhance teeth alignment.
DEVICEConventional fixed appliance
No surgical intervention is going to be applied to the patients in this group.
Sponsors
Damascus University
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 24 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
1. Age range between 18 and 24 years 2. Completion of permanent dentition (except third molars) 3. Mild to moderate crowding (2-6 mm according to Little's index) 4. Absence of medications intake that interferes with pain perception for at least one week before the beginning of the treatment
Exclusion criteria
1. Systematic diseases that could affect bone and tooth movement and no contraindication avoid oral surgery 2. Medical conditions that affect tooth movement (Corticosteroid, NSAIDs) 3. Patients had previous orthodontic treatments 4. Poor oral hygiene or concurrent periodontal disease
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Number of analgesic tables taken | at seven days following the onset of orthodontic treatment | The number of tablets used: Patients in both groups were asked about taking analgesics and their quantity (mg) They answered about taking analgesics using a two-point scale (1. Yes or 2. No), and their quantity by mentioning how many tablets they took. |
| Change in the levels of pain | at 1, 7, 14 days following the onset of orthodontic treatment | Pain is assessed by asking the study participant to place a mark on a horizontal 100 mm line to indicate the level of pain being experienced. The left end of the line refers to no pain (VAS=0) where the right end refers to maximum (unimaginable) pain (VAS=100). The level of pain is represented in the number of millimeters measured from the left end of the line to the mark pointed out by the patient. This is called the Visual Analogue Score (VAS) where the higher the number is the more intense the pain. |
| Change in the levels of discomfort: | at 1, 7, 14 days following the onset of orthodontic treatment | discomfort is assessed by asking the study participant to place a mark on a horizontal 100 mm line to indicate the level of discomfort being experienced. The left end of the line refers to no discomfort (VAS=0) where the right end refers to maximum discomfort (VAS=100). The level of discomfort is represented in the number of millimeters measured from the left end of the line to the mark pointed out by the patient. This is called the Visual Analogue Score (VAS) where the higher the number is the more intense the discomfort. |
| Change in the levels of swelling | at 1, 7, 14 days following the onset of orthodontic treatment | swelling is assessed by asking the study participant to place a mark on a horizontal 100 mm line to indicate the level of swelling being experienced. The left end of the line refers to no swelling (VAS=0) where the right end refers to maximum swelling (VAS=100). The level of swelling is represented in the number of millimeters measured from the left end of the line to the mark pointed out by the patient. This is called the Visual Analogue Score (VAS) where the higher the number is the more intense the swelling. |
| Change in the perception of mastication problems: | at 1, 7, 14 days following the onset of orthodontic treatment | difficulties of mastication are assessed by asking the study participant to place a mark on a horizontal 100 mm line to indicate the level of difficulties in mastication being experienced. The left end of the line refers to no difficulties (VAS=0) where the right end refers to maximum difficulties (VAS=100). The level of difficulties in mastication are represented in the number of millimeters measured from the left end of the line to the mark pointed out by the patient. This is called the Visual Analogue Score (VAS) where the higher the number is the more intense the difficulties of mastication. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Satisfaction with the ease of the procedure | At the end of leveling and alignment | is assessed for both groups by asking the study participant to place a mark on a horizontal 100 mm line to indicate the level of ease. The left end of the line refers to no ease (VAS=0) where the right end refers to maximum ease (VAS=100). The grade of ease is represented in the number of millimeters measured from the left end of the line to the mark pointed out by the patient. This is called the Visual Analogue Score (VAS) where the higher the number is the more intense the ease of the procedure. |
| Satisfaction through acceptability of the procedure | At the end of leveling and alignment | Patients in corticision group were asked about possibility of repeating the procedure, and they answered using a two-point scale (1. Yes or 2. No). |
| Satisfaction through recommending the procedure | At the end of leveling and alignment | Recommendation to a friend: Patients in corticision group were asked about making recommendation to a friend, and they answered using a two-point scale (1. Yes or 2. No). |
| Satisfaction using VAS: | At the end of leveling and alignment | Definition: satisfaction is assessed for both groups by asking the study participant to place a mark on a horizontal 100 mm line to indicate the level of satisfaction. The left end of the line refers to no satisfaction (VAS=0) where the right end refers to maximum satisfaction (VAS=100). The level of satisfaction is represented in the number of millimeters measured from the left end of the line to the mark pointed out by the patient. This is called the Visual Analogue Score (VAS) where the higher the number is the more intense the satisfaction. |
Countries
Syria
Outcome results
None listed