Skip to content

Pilot Study of the CereVasc® eShunt® System in Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus

Pilot Study to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of the CereVasc® eShunt® System in the Treatment of Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05250505
Enrollment
30
Registered
2022-02-22
Start date
2022-03-10
Completion date
2030-04-01
Last updated
2026-03-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hydrocephalus, Hydrocephalus, Normal Pressure

Keywords

eShunt, Minimally invasive shunt, Endovascular shunt

Brief summary

The eShunt System includes proprietary delivery componentry and the eShunt Implant, a permanent implant deployed in a minimally invasive, neurointerventional procedure. The eShunt Implant is designed to mimic the function of the arachnoid granulations by draining excess cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) from the intracranial subarachnoid space (SAS) into the venous system.

Detailed description

This is a prospective, non-randomized, open-label, single-center, pilot study in subjects with normal pressure hydrocephalus for whom a traditional CSF shunt implant is indicated. Up to 30 subjects will receive the eShunt Implant at one investigational site. Subjects will return for five follow-up visits in the first year and then continue to attend visits every six months for five years post-implantation. The study objectives are to demonstrate safety of the eShunt Procedure, as well as demonstrate safety and efficacy of the eShunt Implant in a small sample of patients. Subjects will be followed long-term; primary analysis results will be used to support additional studies.

Interventions

The eShunt System consists of endovascular delivery componentry and a permanent implant intended to shunt cerebrospinal fluid from the intracranial subarachnoid space to the venous system in adults.

Sponsors

CereVasc Inc
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY
AlvaMed, Inc.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Simplified Clinical Data Systems, LLC
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Bioscience Consulting, Inc.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Single group assignment

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
65 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Patients 65-85 years old and traditional CSF shunt placement is indicated based upon a diagnostic NPH evaluation 2. Patient is able and willing to provide written informed consent 3. History or evidence of gait impairment duration ≥6 months 4. Clinical presentation consistent with NPH including 2 or more of the clinical triad (i.e., history of gait disturbance, progressive mental deterioration, and urinary urgency or incontinence), together with: 1. Brain MRI signs of ventricular enlargement disproportionate to cerebral atrophy (Evans Index \>0.3) and the absence of severe hippocampal atrophy 2. Pre-procedure spinal tap test with subsequent gait disturbance improvement (Timed Up and Go Test) of at least 20% 3. CSF opening pressure ≥10 cmH2O 4. Baseline cognitive evaluation assessed by Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) test score ≥12 5. Pre-procedure MRI confirmation of anatomy suitable for eShunt Procedure, as described in Section 1.8.3.4.2 and confirmed by SSC 6. Pre-procedure CT confirmation of anatomy suitable for eShunt Procedure, as described in Section 1.8.3.4.2 and confirmed by SSC

Exclusion criteria

1. Unable to walk 10 meters (33 feet) with or without an assistive device 2. Conditions impairing gait that are considered to be unrelated to hydrocephalus 3. Signs or symptoms of obstructive hydrocephalus 4. Active systemic infection or infection detected in CSF 5. Prior or existing shunts, endoscopic third ventriculostomy, or any previous surgical intervention for hydrocephalus 6. Hypersensitivity or contraindication to heparin or radiographic contrast agents which cannot be adequately pre-medicated, desensitized or where no alternative is available 7. Occlusion or stenosis of the internal jugular vein 8. Venous distension in the neck on physical exam 9. Atrial septal defect or patent foramen ovale identified on cardiac echocardiogram 10. History of bleeding diatheses, coagulopathy or will refuse blood transfusion in cases of emergency 11. Stroke or transient ischemic attack within 180 days of eShunt Procedure 12. Presence of a deep vein thrombosis superior to the popliteal vein 13. International Normalized Ratio (INR) or Partial Thromboplastin Time (PTT) results outside of normal range (INR 0.8-1.4; PTT 25-35 seconds) 14. Presence of a posterior fossa tumor or mass 15. Life expectancy \< 1 year 16. Currently participating in another investigational drug or device trial that could conflict with study data collection or follow-up 17. Other medical illnesses that may cause the patient to be non-compliant with the protocol or confound data interpretation 18. Pregnant or planning to become pregnant 19. Unwilling or unable to comply with follow-up requirements

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Device and/or procedure-related serious adverse events (SAEs)90 days following eShunt Implant deploymentRate of occurrence of device and/or procedure-related serious adverse events (SAEs)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of participants with abnormal MRI findings90 days following eShunt Implant deploymentNumber of participants with abnormal MRI findings and descriptive summaries of findings
Number of participants with abnormal CT findings90 days following eShunt Implant deploymentNumber of participants with abnormal CT findings and descriptive summaries of findings
Number of participants with clinically significant abnormal complete blood count (CBC) results90, 180 and 365 days following eShunt Implant deploymentNumber of participants with clinically significant abnormal results and descriptive summaries of CBC results
Number of participants with clinically significant abnormal blood chemistry results90, 180 and 365 days following eShunt Implant deploymentNumber of participants with clinically significant abnormal findings and descriptive summaries of blood chemistry results
Number of participants with clinically significant abnormal neurological exam findings90, 180 and 365 days following eShunt Implant deployment and at study completionNumber of participants with clinically significant abnormal findings and descriptive summaries of neurological exam finding
Number of participants with adverse events90, 180 and 365 days following eShunt Implant deployment and at study completionTabulation of all adverse events
Change in gait compared to baseline90, 180 and 365 days following eShunt Implant deploymentChange in gait compared to baseline as measured by the duration in seconds of the Timed Up and Go Test (shorter durations indicate improvement (increased mobility))
Change in cognitive ability compared to baseline90, 180 and 365 days following eShunt Implant deploymentChange in cognitive ability compared to baseline as measured by Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) scores (scores range from 0-30; higher scores indicate improvement (less cognitive disability))
Change in urinary symptoms compared to baseline90, 180 and 365 days following eShunt Implant deploymentChange in urinary symptoms compared to baseline as measured by the Neurogenic Bladder Symptom Score (NBSS) (scores range from 0-28; lower scores indicate improvement (fewer symptoms))
Change in Modified Rankin Scale compared to baseline90, 180 and 365 days following eShunt Implant deploymentChange in degree of disability compared to baseline as measured by Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores (scores range from 0-6; lower scores indicate improvement (less disability))

Countries

Argentina

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORPedro Lylyk, MD

Clínica La Sagrada Familia

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 19, 2026