Skip to content

Forecasting and Preventing Post-Bariatric Hypoglycaemia WP 2

Forecasting and Preventing Post-Bariatric Hypoglycaemia (Work Package 2)

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05250271
Acronym
PBH Forecast
Enrollment
8
Registered
2022-02-22
Start date
2022-01-18
Completion date
2022-07-26
Last updated
2022-12-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Post-bariatric Hypoglycaemia, Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass

Keywords

Continuous Glucose Monitoring

Brief summary

The overall aim of this study is to develop a sustainable hypoglycemia correction strategy.

Detailed description

Obesity is a major global public health concern, for which the most effective therapy is bariatric surgery. Beyond weight loss, bariatric surgery exerts powerful effects on glucose metabolism, achieving complete type 2 diabetes remission in up to 70% of cases. An exaggeration of these effects, however, can result in an increasingly recognized metabolic complication known as postprandial hyperinsulinaemic hypoglycaemia or post-bariatric hypoglycaemia (PBH). The condition manifests 1-3 years after surgery with meal-induced hypoglycaemic episodes. Emerging data suggests that PBH is more frequent than previously thought and affects approximately 30% of postoperative patients, more commonly after gastric bypass than sleeve gastrectomy. Of note, asymptomatic PBH is common, as shown in studies using continuous glucose monitoring (CGM). It is known from extensive research in people with diabetes that recurrent episodes of hypoglycaemia impair counter regulatory defences against subsequent events, predisposing patients to severe hypoglycaemia. Despite the increasing prevalence of PBH, clinical implications in this population are still unclear. Anecdotal evidence from patients with PBH suggests a high burden for these patients due to the recurrent hypoglycaemias with possibly debilitating consequences. It is well established that even mild hypoglycaemia (plasma glucose of 3.4 mmol/L) in diabetic and non-diabetic patients impairs various cognitive domains. Of note, some of the cognitive functions remain impaired for up to 75 min, even when the hypoglycaemia is corrected. Further concerns exist from observational studies showing associations between PBH during pregnancy and poor foetal growth. Thus, it is important to timely detect and treat hypoglycaemia with an intervention that allows quick recovery of glycaemia to a safe level, thereby alleviating symptoms and eliminating the risk of potentially hazardous sequelae. Current diabetes-inspired guidelines recommend to correct hypoglycaemia with 15-20 g fast-acting carbohydrates, preferably glucose. However, clinical experience with PBH patients shows that the rapid spikes in glycaemia following correction of hypoglycaemia with such proposed strategies may trigger rebound hypoglycaemia in PBH patients. However, hypoglycaemia correction strategies that are tailored to the specific needs of PBH do not exist currently. Previous research suggests that glucose co-ingested with amino acids induces a metabolic environment that could be favourable for PBH patients due to elevated glucagon levels. However, it currently remains speculative whether combinations of amino acids with glucose could offer more suitable and sustainable PBH correction strategies. Given the potentially hazardous consequences of hypoglycaemia, development of hypoglycaemia management strategies to adequately predict and treat critical blood glucose levels in the PBH population are urgently needed. Such strategies have to significantly lower the burden of PBH and increase patient safety. The overall aim or the PBH forecast project (containing 3 WPs) is to prevent hypoglycaemic events in patients with PBH and to develop a sustainable hypoglycaemia correction strategy. The primary objective of WP 2 is to test different nutritional strategies for sustainable hypoglycaemia correction (e.g. minimising time spent hypoglycaemic without causing rebound hyper- and hypoglycaemia).

Interventions

OTHER15 g dextrose

15 g dextrose tablets

OTHER5 g dextrose

5 g dextrose tablets

OTHERProtein bar

5 g carbohydrates + 10 g protein

Sponsors

University of Padova
CollaboratorOTHER
Lia Bally
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Masking description

Participants are blinded to sensor and plasma glucose.

Intervention model description

3-period crossover design

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Post-bariatric surgery patients (Roux-en-Y gastric bypass) with PBH, defined as postprandial plasma or sensor glucose \<3.0 mmol/L according to the International Hypoglycaemia Study Group and exclusion of other causes of hypoglycaemia * Age ≥18 years

Exclusion criteria

* Inability to give informed consent as documented by signature * Pregnant or lactating women * Inability or contraindications to undergo the investigated intervention * Drugs interfering with blood glucose (e.g. SGLT-2 inhibitors, acarbose) during the time of investigation * Inability to follow the procedures of the study, e.g. due to language problems, psychological disorders, dementia, etc.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time in glucose target rangeDuring 40 minutes after hypoglycaemia correctionThe primary endpoint is time in glucose target range (plasma glucose 3.9-5.5 mmol/L).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of time with plasma glucose <3.9 mmol/LDuring 40 minutes after hypoglycaemia correctionUnits: %
Percentage of time with plasma glucose >5.5 mmol/LDuring 40 minutes after hypoglycaemia correctionUnits: %
Percentage of time with plasma glucose >10.0 mmol/LDuring 40 minutes after hypoglycaemia correctionUnits: %
Percentage of time with sensor glucose <3.0 mmol/LDuring 150 minutes after hypoglycaemia correctionThe sensor glucose values will be adjusted to plasma glucose to increase accuracy
Percentage of time with sensor glucose <3.9 mmol/LDuring 150 minutes after hypoglycaemia correctionThe sensor glucose values will be adjusted to plasma glucose to increase accuracy
Percentage of time with sensor glucose >5.5 mmol/LDuring 150 minutes after hypoglycaemia correctionThe sensor glucose values will be adjusted to plasma glucose to increase accuracy
Percentage of time with plasma glucose <3.0 mmol/LDuring 40 minutes after hypoglycaemia correctionUnits: %
Peak plasma glucoseUntil 40 minutes after inital hypoglycaemia correction or 180 minutes after meal intake (the later timepoint of the two)Peak plasma glucose (mmol/L)
Time to euglycaemiaUntil 40 minutes after inital hypoglycaemia correction or 180 minutes after meal intake (the later timepoint of the two)Time to euglycaemia after hypoglycaemia correction (plasma glucose ≥3.9 mmol/L)
Rebound hypoglycaemiaDuring 150 minutes after hypoglycaemia correctionProportion of participants with rebound hypoglycaemia (plasma glucose \<3.0 mmol/L following successful primary hypoglycaemia correction defined as plasma glucose ≥3.9 mmol/L)
Insulin15 minutes after hypoglycaemia correctionSerum insulin concentration
Glucagon15 minutes after hypoglycaemia correctionSerum glucagon concentration
Percentage of time with sensor glucose >10.0 mmol/LDuring 150 minutes after hypoglycaemia correctionThe sensor glucose values will be adjusted to plasma glucose to increase accuracy

Countries

Switzerland

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026