Skip to content

Protein Supplementation and Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation in Persons With SCI

Effects of Protein Supplementation and Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation on Fat-free Mass in Persons With Motor Complete Spinal Cord Injury: a Pilot Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05249985
Enrollment
30
Registered
2022-02-22
Start date
2022-04-05
Completion date
2024-02-15
Last updated
2024-02-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Spinal Cord Injuries

Keywords

Protein, NMES

Brief summary

The aim of this pilot study is to explore how body composition, circulating markers of metabolic health and skin integrity in persons with a spinal cord injury (SCI) are affected by 12 weeks of quadriceps neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) resistance training. The novel element of this study is that one group will be given additional daily protein supplementation in addition to the NMES training (treatment group), whereas the other group will only perform the NMES training (control group). The investigators hypothesise that NMES in combination with protein results in larger improvements in the aforementioned outcomes compared with NMES alone.

Detailed description

A spinal cord injury (SCI) is a debilitating condition, with paralysis below the lesion level as one of the main hallmarks. As a result of paralysis, together with decreased levels of physical activity and impairment-specific co-morbidities such as autonomic dysfunction, persons with SCI have a markedly reduced muscle mass. Being the major site for glucose disposal, skeletal muscle is key for the maintenance of metabolic health, while it also helps with weight management by contributing to energy expenditure at rest. As such, effective strategies to restore muscle mass in persons with SCI are warranted and can have a significant impact on metabolic health and chronic disease risk in this population. While resistance training is widely recognised as an effective intervention to increase muscle mass in able-bodied individuals, paralysis in the lower limbs of persons with SCI precludes the use of traditional resistance training in this population. NMES has been developed to overcome this barrier and allows persons with SCI to engage in resistance exercise. Notwithstanding the evidence supporting the use of NMES on its own, combined interventions may further enhance its potential to improve health and physical function. Indeed, in the more widely studied population of older adults, that is also at risk for sarcopenia (loss of skeletal muscle mass and strength), increasing daily protein intake enhances the efficacy of resistance training to increase muscle mass. The primary objective of this study is to determine the impact of a 12-week intervention of NMES in combination with protein supplementation when compared with NMES alone on fat free mass in the legs. Secondary objectives are to investigate the impact of the intervention on 1) markers of cardiometabolic health, namely glucose tolerance and fasting plasma lipid concentrations, 2) resting metabolic rate, and 3) skin blood flow at the level of the sacrum in response to experimental pressure. Outcomes related to tertiary objectives include perceived quality of life, neuropathic pain, body image, sleep quality and spasms; as well as free-living energy balance, physical activity and feasibility outcomes related to recruitment, adherence and participant' experiences with the intervention. It is hypothesised that NMES in combination with protein results in larger improvements in the aforementioned outcomes compared with NMES alone.

Interventions

DEVICENMES

Participants will undergo 12 weeks of neuromuscular electrical stimulation- (NMES) based resistance training on the quadriceps.

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTProtein

Participants will consume a daily protein supplement

Sponsors

McMaster University
CollaboratorOTHER
Danone Nutricia
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Loughborough University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
NONE

Masking description

As no placebo supplement is being used in this intervention, it is not possible to do any form of masking.

Intervention model description

Participants are assigned to one of two groups in parallel for the duration of the study. This will be either (a) NMES plus protein supplementation, or (b) NMES only.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Motor complete spinal cord injury * Time since injury injury \>1 year

Exclusion criteria

* Spinal cord injury below T10 vertebrae * Habitual protein intake exceeding 2g / kg body mass / day * Having used NMES resistance training once or more per week in the last six months * Lactose intolerant * Any disease or medication that means the participant should not exercise * Participation in a study involving ionising radiation in the previous 12 months

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in bone mineral densityPre-intervention (baseline) and at 1 week post-12 week interventionDual x-ray absorptiometry
Change in lean soft tissue massPre-intervention (baseline) and at 1 week post-12 week interventionDual x-ray absorptiometry
Change in fat massPre-intervention (baseline) and at 1 week post-12 week interventionDual x-ray absorptiometry

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in fasting circulating C-reactive proteinPre-intervention (baseline) and at 1 week post-12 week interventionResting blood sample
Change in glucose tolerancePre-intervention (baseline) and at 1 week post-12 week interventionOral glucose tolerance test
Change in resting metabolic ratePre-intervention (baseline) and at 1 week post-12 week interventionExpired air analysis
Change in sacral skin blood flowPre-intervention (baseline) and at 1 week post-12 week interventionDoppler flowmetry
Change in insulin resistancePre-intervention (baseline) and at 1 week post-12 week interventionOral glucose tolerance test
Change in fasting plasma lipid concentrationsPre-intervention (baseline) and at 1 week post-12 week interventionResting blood sample

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in skinfold thicknessPre-intervention (baseline) and at 1 week post-12 week interventionMeasured in millimetre
HeightPre-intervention onlyMeasured in meters
Change in blood pressurePre-intervention (baseline) and at 1 week post-12 week interventionAutomatic blood pressure cuff
Change in body weightPre-intervention (baseline) and at 1 week post-12 week interventionMeasured in kilograms
Change in waist and hip circumferencePre-intervention (baseline) and at 1 week post-12 week interventionMeasured in centimeters to provide a waist-to-hip ratio
Change in daily energy intakePre-intervention (baseline) and at 1 week post-12 week intervention3 day food diary
Change in physical activityPre-intervention (baseline) and at 1 week post-12 week interventionWrist-worn accelerometer
Change in sleep efficiency and durationPre-intervention (baseline) and at 1 week post-12 week interventionWrist-worn accelerometer
Change in sleep qualityPre-intervention (baseline) and at 1 week post-12 week interventionSleep Quality Scale (available answers include: rarely, sometimes, often, almost always)
Change in muscle spasticityPre-intervention (baseline) and at 1 week post-12 week interventionThe Spinal Cord Injury Spasticity Evaluation Tool
Change in mental healthPre-intervention (baseline) and at 1 week post-12 week intervention5-item Mental Health Inventory
Change in neuropathic painPre-intervention (baseline) and at 1 week post-12 week interventionNeuropathic Pain Questionnaire
Change in body imagePre-intervention (baseline) and at 1 week post-12 week interventionBody Image Satisfaction Questionnaire

Countries

United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026