Skip to content

Comparing Manual Versus Stapled Side to Side Ileocolic Anastomosis in Crohn's Disease

Rct in croHn's Disease: Comparing mANual (End to End and Kono-s) Versus stapleD Side TO Side Ileocolic Anastomosis (HANDTOEND)

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05246917
Acronym
HAND2END
Enrollment
189
Registered
2022-02-18
Start date
2022-05-25
Completion date
2024-12-31
Last updated
2022-05-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Crohn Disease, Crohn's Ileocolitis, IBD, Ileocolitis

Keywords

Recurrence IBD, IBD, Endoscopic Recurrence, Rurgeers Score, Surgical recurrence, Crohn's Ileocolitis, Ileocolic Anastomosis, Crohn's disease

Brief summary

RESEARCH QUESTION Are handsewn (end to end and Kono S side to side) anastomoses superior to side to side stapled anastomosis after ileocolic resection for Crohn's disease with respect to endoscopic recurrence, gastrointestinal function and costs. HYPOTHESIS Stapled side anastomosis advised in ECCO guidelines heal with ulcerations on the staple line causing systematic over scoring of endoscopic recurrence leading to unjustified restarting of expensive drugs reducing QOL and increasing costs. Side to side saccular configuration causes stasis affecting recurrence and dysfunction. DESIGN Randomised superiority study POPULATION Patients with Crohn requiring (re)resection of the (neo)terminal ileum INTERVENTION Kono S and end to end hand sewn anastomosis USUAL CARE Side to side stapled anastomosis OUTCOME Endoscopic recurrence (local and central reading) at 6 months SAMPLE 25% reduction in 2:1 ratio -\> 126 + 63 = 189 patients KEYWORDS Crohn, ileocolic resection, recurrence

Interventions

To perform hand sewn anastomosis (either end to end or Kono-s) during the reconstruction face of ileocolic resection

Sponsors

IRCCS San Raffaele
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

Randomised superiority study

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 99 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Males and females aged \>18 years * Ileocolic disease or disease of the neoterminal ileum with an indication for resection * Concurrent therapies with corticosteroids, 5-ASA drugs, thiopurines, MTX, antibiotics, and anti-TNF therapy are permitted. * All patients should have undergone a colonoscopy and MR enterography (or CT enterography if MR contraindicated) in last 3 months to assess extent of disease. * Ability to comply with protocol. * Competent and able to provide written informed consent. * Patient must have been discussed in the local MDT

Exclusion criteria

* Inability to give informed consent. * Patients less than 16 years of age. * Patients undergoing repeated ileocolic resection. * History of cancer \< 5 years which might influence patients prognosis * Emergent operation. Pregnant or breast feeding.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
6 months endoscopic recurrence of endoscopy using the modified Rutgeerts classification.6 monthsThe comparison of 6 months endoscopic recurrence between local and central reading of recordings of endoscopy using the modified Rutgeerts classification.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Morbidity1 yearpostoperative morbidity measure
Clinical Recurrence1 yearClinical and surgical recurrence using Clavien Dindo
Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ)1 yearQuality of life measured with IBD questionnaire
Hospital Costs1 yearHospital costs per patient in both groups

Countries

Italy

Contacts

Primary Contactvittoria bellato, MD
vittoria.bellato@gmail.com+447827422840

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 7, 2026