Lumbar Disc Herniation
Conditions
Brief summary
There are currently no standard criteria for evaluating the risk of recurrent disk herniation following surgical repair. This study investigated the predictive values of five presurgical imaging parameters, paraspinal muscle quality, annular tear size, Modic changes, modified Pfirrmann's disc degeneration grade, and presence of sacralization or fusion. Clinical status and MRI findings were evaluated before surgery and 4, 12, and 24 months post-surgery using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and Short Form 36 (SF36).
Interventions
Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* first operation for a single-level lumbar disk herniation * no concurrent spinal pathology such as stenosis, spondylolisthesis, or deformity * complete data on clinical and radiological parameters
Exclusion criteria
* the operation was for multi-level pathologies * recurrent surgery * exhibited concurrent spinal pathology * was missing or incomplete clinical and radiological data
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| sacralization or fusion | Preoperative 1 month | MRI findings |
| Annular tear size | Preoperative 1 month | With computer as millimeter |
| Modic changes | Preoperative 1 month | Modic classification |
| Disc degeneration grade | Preoperative 1 month | modified Pfirrmann's classification |
| Paraspinal muscle quality | Preoperative 1 month | Simplified 3-tier classification |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) | 4, 12, and 24 months after surgery | Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire |
| Short Form 36 (SF36) | 4, 12, and 24 months after surgery | SF-36 Questionnaire |
| Visual Analog Scale | 4, 12, and 24 months after surgery | 0-10 numerical scale (0=no pain, 10 =the worst pain) |
Countries
Turkey (Türkiye)