Skip to content

Application of Ideal Binary Masking to Disordered Speech

Application of Ideal Binary Masking to Disordered Speech

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05244603
Enrollment
435
Registered
2022-02-17
Start date
2021-12-01
Completion date
2023-12-30
Last updated
2025-03-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dysarthria, Hearing Loss, Sensorineural

Brief summary

Dysarthria and hearing loss are communication disorders that can substantially reduce intelligibility of speech and the addition of background noise adds a further challenge. This proposal utilizes an established signal processing technique, currently exploited for improved understanding of speech in noise for listeners with hearing loss, to investigate its potential application to overcome speech-in-noise difficulties for listeners understanding dysarthric speech. Successful completion of this project will demonstrate proof-of-concept for the application of this signal processing technique to dysarthric speech in noise, and inform the development of an R01 proposal to perform a large-scale evaluation of the technology, and clinically meaningful implications, in a broad range of disordered speech types and severities.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALIdeal binary mask

Speech in noise processed by ideal binary mask to reduce background noise

Sponsors

Utah State University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

INCLUSION CRITERIA for All Participants * Native speakers of American English * No history of speech or language impairment * No significant prior contact with persons having neurogenic speech disorders INCLUSION CRITERIA for Participants with Normal Hearing * 18 to 70 years of age * Auditory thresholds of 20 dB HL or better bilaterally at octave frequencies from 250-8000 Hz (if under 55 years of age) * Auditory thresholds of 25 dB HL or better bilaterally at octave frequencies from 250-4000 Hz (if over 55 years of age) INCLUSION CRITERIA for Participants with Sensorineural Hearing Loss * 18 to 90 years of age

Exclusion criteria

*

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percent Correct Speech IntelligibilityOne hourPercent of keywords correctly identified by the participant for the processed speech stimuli, listeners were presented with phrases containing several words and they reported back what they heard. The number of words corrected reported by each listener was counted and converted to a 'percent correct' score.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Normal Hearing
Listeners with normal hearing Ideal binary mask: Speech in noise processed by ideal binary mask to reduce background noise
422
Hearing Impaired
Listeners with hearing loss Ideal binary mask: Speech in noise processed by ideal binary mask to reduce background noise
13
Total435

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicNormal HearingHearing ImpairedTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
12 Participants9 Participants21 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
410 Participants4 Participants414 Participants
Age, Continuous35 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12
69 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 26
52 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
31 Participants0 Participants31 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
391 Participants13 Participants404 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
4 Participants0 Participants4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
31 Participants0 Participants31 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
19 Participants0 Participants19 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
5 Participants0 Participants5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
363 Participants13 Participants376 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
422 participants13 participants435 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
204 Participants7 Participants211 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
218 Participants6 Participants224 Participants
Speech intelligibility +5 dB SNR40 percentage of words correct
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5
24 percentage of words correct
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16
32.5 percentage of words correct
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.5

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 4220 / 13
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 4220 / 13
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 4220 / 13

Outcome results

Primary

Percent Correct Speech Intelligibility

Percent of keywords correctly identified by the participant for the processed speech stimuli, listeners were presented with phrases containing several words and they reported back what they heard. The number of words corrected reported by each listener was counted and converted to a 'percent correct' score.

Time frame: One hour

Population: Listeners with normal hearing and listeners with hearing loss

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Normal HearingPercent Correct Speech Intelligibility69 percentage of words correctly reportedStandard Error 1.06
Hearing ImpairedPercent Correct Speech Intelligibility63 percentage of words correctly reportedStandard Error 2.2

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026