Skip to content

Biomedicines and Bacterial Translocation in Spondyloarthritis

Bacterial Translocation in Spondyloarthritis: Evaluation Before and After Starting a Biomedicine.

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05244109
Acronym
TEARE-BIO
Enrollment
90
Registered
2022-02-17
Start date
2022-02-07
Completion date
2025-05-31
Last updated
2022-06-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Axial Spondyloarthritis

Keywords

bacterial translocation

Brief summary

The aim of this project is to evaluate the effect of anti-TNF and anti-IL17 biotherapies on bacterial translocation in patients with NSAID-resistant axial spondyloarthritis.

Detailed description

Axial spondyloarthritis is a common inflammatory rheumatic disease and its management is based on the use of NSAIDs and biotherapies (anti-TNF and anti-IL17 antibodies). Its pathophysiology involves the digestive mucosa. The colon of patients with spondyloarthritis is the site of asymptomatic inflammation. This inflammation results from dysbiosis, which is responsible for activation of innate immunity linked to bacterial translocation phenomena. Dendritic cells are then activated and the immune response is polarized towards the IL23/Th17 axis. This translocation is secondary to an increase in colonic permeability. The increase in digestive permeability allows translocation of bacteria or bacterial fragments, primarily lipopolysaccharide (LPS). Some proinflammatory cytokines (TNF, IFNγ, and IL23) cause an increase in digestive permeability. IL17 produced in the digestive mucosa has two different effects. Indeed, two types of colonic T cells produce IL17: regulatory T Helpers 17 producing IL10 and IL17 and inflammatory T Helpers 17 producing IL17 and IFNγ. The investigators hypothesize that biotherapies decrease bacterial translocation. They suspect a lesser effect of anti-IL17 compared to anti-TNF because of the potential inhibition of Treg17 lymphocytes.

Interventions

OTHERBlood sample

Blood samples (2 times; 21mL per visit)

DRUGanti-TNF antibody administration

Anti-TNF antibody administration, according to current recommendations and randomization results

DRUGanti-IL-17 antibody administration

Anti-IL-17 antibody administration, according to current recommendations and randomization results

Sponsors

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Besancon
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Axial spondyloarthritis (2009 ASAS criteria) * NSAID arm: Responding to any class of NSAID and not likely to initiate biotherapy * anti-TNF/anti-IL-17 arms: Need to introduce a biomedical drug according to current recommendations (objective signs of inflammation, i.e. MRI sacroiliitis or increased CRP, and failure of two NSAIDs of different classes)

Exclusion criteria

* IBD already diagnosed by a gastroenterologist or suspicion of IBD (bloody diarrhea) * Previous exposure to a biomedical drug (anti TNF or anti IL 17). * Antibiotic use in the 3 months prior to inclusion * Contraindications for treatment with anti-TNF or anti-IL17 (for all patients)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Difference in serum LPS concentration3 monthsDifference in serum LPS concentration, measured by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry, between D0 (before anti-TNF or anti-IL 17) and D90

Countries

France

Contacts

Primary ContactFrank Verhoeven, MD
fverhoeven@chu-besancon.fr+33381668241

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026