Skip to content

Who is Rapid And Success? The Comparison Of Video Fiberscope And Video Laryngoscope

The Comparison Of Video Fiberscope And Video Laryngoscope,With Egri Score> 4

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05243758
Enrollment
60
Registered
2022-02-17
Start date
2018-11-01
Completion date
2019-03-01
Last updated
2022-02-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Airway Responsiveness, Intubation; Difficult or Failed

Brief summary

Endotracheal intubation plays an important role in general anesthesia. Complications can be prevented by using alternative airway devices in predetermined difficult intubation cases. In this study, the investigators aimed to compare the results of endotracheal intubation with video fiberscope and DCI video laryngoscope devices of two different experienced physicians (E and H).

Detailed description

In this randomized and prospective study, 60 patients with EGRI score\> 4 and ASA score \<4, operated between 1 October 2018 and 1 March 2019 in Ondokuz Mayıs University Medical Faculty Hospital were included. Endotracheal intubation was performed by two practitioners using two different devices. Intubation times, number of attempts, failed attempts, postoperative complications and hemodynamic responses were recorded.

Interventions

DEVICEGroup video fiberscope of experienced practitioner

One of the classical alternatives to laryngoscopy in difficult endotracheal intubation is video laryngoscopyvideo fiberscope( Karl Storz GmbH &Co. KG, Tuttlingen, Germany). Reaching the image from the patient with pre- and from the cervical point of view, or from the cervical point of view, to be completed with a good view from a large screen to be completed with an image before and within intubation. It also facilitates learning in education.

DEVICEGroup video laryngoscope of experienced practitioner

Intubation Pending Difficult as well as challenging . Fiberoptic (fiberscope) intubation is the gold standard in difficult airway. Lacking this supplement, it will be widely used for practice, as it is suitable for video laryngeal.

DEVICEGroup video fiberscope of less experienced practitioner

One of the classical alternatives to laryngoscopy in difficult endotracheal intubation is video laryngoscopy video fiberscope( Karl Storz GmbH &Co. KG, Tuttlingen, Germany). Reaching the image from the patient with pre- and from the cervical point of view, or from the cervical point of view, to be completed with a good view from a large screen to be completed with an image before and within intubation. It also facilitates learning in education.

DEVICEGroup video laryngoscope of less experienced practitioner

Entubation pending difficult as well as challenging . Fiberoptic (fiberscope) intubation is the gold standard in difficult airway. Lacking this supplement, it will be widely used for practice, as it is suitable for video laryngeal.Storz DCI Video Laryngoscope (Karl Storz GmbH &Co. KG, Tuttlingen, Germany)

Sponsors

Ondokuz Mayıs University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
SCREENING
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Intervention model description

60 patients aged between 18-65 years, who were operated in the operating room of our hospital, with an EGRI score of \>4 and an ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) score of \<4 were included.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Operated in the operating room of our hospital, * Aged 18-65, * EGRI score\>4, * ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) score\<4

Exclusion criteria

* Cerebrovascular disease (cerebral ischemia, hemorrhage or stroke), presence of carotid stenosis or history of coronary artery disease, * Neurological disorders (history of chronic headache, epilepsy or head trauma), alcohol or psychoactive drug addiction, * Serious heart and/or lung diseases, liver and/or kidney failure, * Uncontrolled diabetes and/or hypertension, * Dental abscess, * Mouth opening \<1.5 cm, * Known bleeding disorder, * Pregnancy, * Mental retardation, * Contraindications to drugs, allergy to drugs used, * Patient rejection

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Intubation times,during intubationThe moment when the endotracheal intubation tube was passed between the vocal cords following the vocal cord image obtained with the device was recorded in seconds. In endotracheal intubation performed with a video fiberscope, the end of the fiberscope with a camera passing through the vocal cords, and in endotracheal intubation performed with a DCI video laryngoscope, the intubation tube passing between the vocal cords was counted as successful intubation time.
Number of attemptsduring intubation for patients,The procedure will be considered unsuccessful if intubation is unsuccessful in three attempts, if the intubation process exceeds three minutes, or if the peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2) is \<90% during this period. If this situation was encountered, it was planned to ventilate the patient with an anesthesia mask until the oxygen saturation approached 100% and to use alternative airway devices.
Time to find the glottis:during intubation for patientsThe time from the moment the device entered between the patient's anterior incisors until the vocal cords were seen was recorded in seconds.
Blood pressureDuring intubation, at 1st, 2nd and 5th minutes after intubationHemodynamic parameters; heart rate (/min), systolic blood pressure (mmHg), diastolic blood pressure (mmHg), mean arterial pressure (mmHg), and SpO2 were recorded before induction (baseline), during intubation, at 1st, 2nd and 5th minutes after intubation
Pulse oximeterBefore induction (baseline), during intubation, at 1st, 2nd and 5th minutes after intubationOximetry is a convenient and painless alternative to needlesticks, is simple to use, and provides immediate data. These advantages make oximetry an invaluable tool for determination the client's need for oxygen therapy and assessing effectiveness of therapy. The oximeter registers arterial oxygen saturation (SaO2). An SaO2 greater than 95% is considered normal, whereas values lower than 93% usually indicate the need for oxygen therapy and further assessment.

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026