Obesity, Morbid, Spinal Anesthesia, Ultrasound Assistance
Conditions
Brief summary
The aim of this study is to compare the paramedian approach for spinal anesthesia using ultrasound assistance (USAS) versus conventional palpation in morbidly obese patients undergoing elective surgeries.
Detailed description
Performing spinal anesthesia using a conventional approach can be considerably challenging in obese patients. Multiple needle attempts may lead to a higher incidence of complications (e.g., postdural puncture headache, paresthesia, hematoma, and infection) and increase patient discomfort and dissatisfaction. Therefore, novel techniques are needed to improve the success rate of spinal anesthesia for such patients. There are two puncture approaches for spinal anesthesia: median approach puncture and paramedian approach puncture. Early studies have noted that the success rate of paramedian approach puncture was higher than that of median approach puncture and that it is associated with fewer complications and postoperative complications. A paramedian approach has been shown to improve the success rate of spinal anesthesia, especially in patients who are unable to sit up or those with a degenerative spine condition. The use of ultrasound has been suggested to increase the efficacy of spinal anesthesia. Recently, ultrasound has emerged as a way to facilitate lumbar neuraxial blocks, namely, the ultrasound assistance (USAS) technique. The ultrasound assistance technique is beneficial for lumbar neuraxial anesthesia, improving technique performance by providing reliable anatomical information.
Interventions
PROCEDUREParamedian conventional palpation group
Patients in this group underwent conventional landmark guided paramedian spinal anesthetic. The spinal anesthesia will be administered based on conventional landmark-based paramedian approach.
PROCEDUREUltrasound assistance paramedian spinal group
This group will have their spinal anesthetic done based on ultrasound assistance paramedian spinal. Spinal anesthesia with a paramedian approach was performed based on the optimum puncture point, suggested puncture angles, and puncture depth. The suggested puncture angles included the cephalad angle measured by the built-in angle program of the ultrasound and the medial angle measured by a 180° protractor (Deli). The puncture depth, the distance from the skin to the posterior complex, was measured utilizing the ultrasound clipper tool.
Sponsors
Kafrelsheikh University
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Age ≥ 18 years * Both sexes * Body mass index (BMI) ≥ 40 kg/m2 * Patients undergoing elective surgeries
Exclusion criteria
* Rejection of spinal anesthesia * History of spinal deformity or spinal surgery * Contraindications to spinal anesthesia (infection of the puncture site, coagulation dysfunction, allergy to local anesthesia, insufficient blood volume or abnormal spinal anatomy).
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| The rate of successful dural puncture on the first attempt | Intraoperatively | First-attempt success rate will be recorded |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Total success rate of spinal anesthesia | Intraoperatively | Successful Dural Puncture Rates for Selected Number of Attempts and Passes in both intervention groups |
| Adverse reactions during puncture | Intraoperatively | Adverse reactions during puncture as incidence of nerve stimulation |
| Complications after anesthesia | 24 hours Postoperative | Complications after anesthesia as incidence of low back pain |
| Patients' satisfaction after surgery | 24 hours Postoperative | 6- Degree of patient satisfaction will be assessed on a 3-point scale; (1= unsatisfied 2= neither satisfied nor unsatisfied 3= satisfied) |
Countries
Egypt
Contacts
Primary ContactMohammad Algyar, MD
Outcome results
None listed