Hoarding Disorder
Conditions
Brief summary
This study will compare two behavioral interventions for hoarding disorder in older adults.
Detailed description
Hoarding disorder is a psychological condition with a unique constellation of consequences for older adults, including increased risk of fire and dying in a fire, insect infestation, and medical problems. Dangers related to cluttered living spaces are exacerbated by reduced executive functioning, attention, and concentration. Hoarding psychopathology results from maladaptive cognitions (e.g., desire to keep items others would discard) and maladaptive behavioral patterns (e.g., avoidance of sorting/discarding items). Extant treatments for hoarding have targeted fear reduction as the mechanism of change, either through cognitive-behavioral therapy focusing on cognitive restructuring or behavior therapy focusing on exposure therapy. Older adults have a lackluster response to cognitive restructuring for hoarding, and, although exposure therapy increases treatment response, both approaches require a lengthy six-month dose. Our preliminary work suggests that fear reduction may not be a universally relevant target mechanism for older adults, and that to be responsive to the specific needs of older adults, other mechanisms need to be identified. Motivational interviewing is a technique that is already typically incorporated into hoarding treatment and has been demonstrated to increase motivation for behavioral change across a range of health conditions for older adults, including physical activity, diet, and disease management. Because sorting/discarding is at its core a health behavior that hoarding patients lack the motivation to engage in, motivational interviewing is likely to decrease hoarding severity by eliciting increased levels of sorting/discarding. The proposed project will use a mechanistic clinical trials approach to determine if a four-month intervention combining motivational interviewing with sorting practice can engage the proposed target, motivation for behavioral change, when compared to a four-month dose of sorting practice alone in a sample of rural-dwelling older adults with hoarding disorder.
Interventions
Participants will receive 16 weekly 1-hour treatment sessions in their home delivered by Masters-level clinicians with the assistance of undergraduate researchers. Each treatment session will involve a combination of motivational interviewing (MI) and sorting practice. The rationale behind the sorting practice is to develop the skill of sorting and the formation of a daily sorting routine. The MI portion of the initial session will involve an evaluation of client strengths and individual biopsychosocial goals. The initial and subsequent sessions will include a variety of MI techniques, including decisional balancing, developing discrepancy, personalized feedback, and reinforcement of responsibility of sense of self-efficacy.
Participants will receive 16 weekly 1-hour treatment sessions in their home delivered by Masters-level clinicians with the assistance of undergraduate researchers. Clinicians will encourage participants to sort objects during each session while refraining from use of any specific cognitive or motivational therapeutic techniques. Participants will be asked to record the frequency and duration of any sorting/ discarding they did during the previous week.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Aged 60+ * Live within a 60-minute driving radius of Starkville, MS * Have a primary psychiatric diagnosis of hoarding disorder
Exclusion criteria
* Major cognitive impairment * Active psychosis, drug use, or acute suicidal ideation * Concurrent psychotherapy focused on hoarding * Changed psychotropic medications within the past three months
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Frequency of Sorting/Discarding Behavior | Four months | As a behavioral indicator of motivation to engage in sorting/discarding behavior, participants will be asked to report at their weekly treatment sessions the frequency of sorting/discarding items in the previous week. Data were analyzed as percentage of days sorted between sessions (assessed at sessions 2-16). Mixed effects models were used to analyze data such that participants with at least one timepoint were included in the analyses. |
| University of Rhode Island Change Assessment Questionnaire | Four months | The University of Rhode Island Change Assessment Questionnaire (URICA) is a 32-item Likert scale that assesses readiness for change. Scores for readiness for change are calculated by subtracting pre contemplation items from the other summed items. Scores range from -2 to 14, with higher scores indicating greater readiness for change. |
| Apathy Evaluation Scale | Four months | The Apathy Evaluation Scale is an 18-item measure of an individual's deficits in goal-directed thoughts and behavior. Scores range from 18-72, with higher scores reflecting more apathy. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Treatment Acceptability/ Adherence Scale | Immediately after session 1 | The Treatment Acceptability/ Adherence Scale is a 10-item self-report measure of a patient's perception of the acceptability of a treatment as well as their anticipated adherence to the protocol. Scores range from 10-70, with higher scores indicating greater acceptability and perceived adherence. |
| Saving Inventory-Revised | Four months | The Saving Inventory-Revised is a 23-item measure of the three core hoarding symptoms (urges to save, difficulty discarding, and excessive clutter). Scores range from 0 to 92, with higher scores indicating greater symptom severity. |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Pre-assignment details
12 participants dropped from the study between enrollment and randomization.
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | — |
|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 69 Year STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.2 |
| Race (NIH/OMB) American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Asian | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Black or African American | 2 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) More than one race | 2 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) White | 28 Participants |
| Savings Inventory-Revised | 49.53 score on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.76 |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 11 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 8 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 18 | 0 / 18 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 0 / 18 | 0 / 18 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 18 | 0 / 18 |