Skip to content

Motivational Interviewing to Enhance Behavioral Change in Older Adults With Hoarding Disorder

Motivational Interviewing to Enhance Behavioral Change in Older Adults With Hoarding Disorder

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05237466
Enrollment
48
Registered
2022-02-14
Start date
2022-06-01
Completion date
2025-12-10
Last updated
2026-07-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hoarding Disorder

Brief summary

This study will compare two behavioral interventions for hoarding disorder in older adults.

Detailed description

Hoarding disorder is a psychological condition with a unique constellation of consequences for older adults, including increased risk of fire and dying in a fire, insect infestation, and medical problems. Dangers related to cluttered living spaces are exacerbated by reduced executive functioning, attention, and concentration. Hoarding psychopathology results from maladaptive cognitions (e.g., desire to keep items others would discard) and maladaptive behavioral patterns (e.g., avoidance of sorting/discarding items). Extant treatments for hoarding have targeted fear reduction as the mechanism of change, either through cognitive-behavioral therapy focusing on cognitive restructuring or behavior therapy focusing on exposure therapy. Older adults have a lackluster response to cognitive restructuring for hoarding, and, although exposure therapy increases treatment response, both approaches require a lengthy six-month dose. Our preliminary work suggests that fear reduction may not be a universally relevant target mechanism for older adults, and that to be responsive to the specific needs of older adults, other mechanisms need to be identified. Motivational interviewing is a technique that is already typically incorporated into hoarding treatment and has been demonstrated to increase motivation for behavioral change across a range of health conditions for older adults, including physical activity, diet, and disease management. Because sorting/discarding is at its core a health behavior that hoarding patients lack the motivation to engage in, motivational interviewing is likely to decrease hoarding severity by eliciting increased levels of sorting/discarding. The proposed project will use a mechanistic clinical trials approach to determine if a four-month intervention combining motivational interviewing with sorting practice can engage the proposed target, motivation for behavioral change, when compared to a four-month dose of sorting practice alone in a sample of rural-dwelling older adults with hoarding disorder.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALRECLAIM: Reducing Clutter and Increasing Meaning

Participants will receive 16 weekly 1-hour treatment sessions in their home delivered by Masters-level clinicians with the assistance of undergraduate researchers. Each treatment session will involve a combination of motivational interviewing (MI) and sorting practice. The rationale behind the sorting practice is to develop the skill of sorting and the formation of a daily sorting routine. The MI portion of the initial session will involve an evaluation of client strengths and individual biopsychosocial goals. The initial and subsequent sessions will include a variety of MI techniques, including decisional balancing, developing discrepancy, personalized feedback, and reinforcement of responsibility of sense of self-efficacy.

BEHAVIORALSorting Practice

Participants will receive 16 weekly 1-hour treatment sessions in their home delivered by Masters-level clinicians with the assistance of undergraduate researchers. Clinicians will encourage participants to sort objects during each session while refraining from use of any specific cognitive or motivational therapeutic techniques. Participants will be asked to record the frequency and duration of any sorting/ discarding they did during the previous week.

Sponsors

Mississippi State University
Lead SponsorOTHER
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
CollaboratorNIH

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
60 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Aged 60+ * Live within a 60-minute driving radius of Starkville, MS * Have a primary psychiatric diagnosis of hoarding disorder

Exclusion criteria

* Major cognitive impairment * Active psychosis, drug use, or acute suicidal ideation * Concurrent psychotherapy focused on hoarding * Changed psychotropic medications within the past three months

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Frequency of Sorting/Discarding BehaviorFour monthsAs a behavioral indicator of motivation to engage in sorting/discarding behavior, participants will be asked to report at their weekly treatment sessions the frequency of sorting/discarding items in the previous week. Data were analyzed as percentage of days sorted between sessions (assessed at sessions 2-16). Mixed effects models were used to analyze data such that participants with at least one timepoint were included in the analyses.
University of Rhode Island Change Assessment QuestionnaireFour monthsThe University of Rhode Island Change Assessment Questionnaire (URICA) is a 32-item Likert scale that assesses readiness for change. Scores for readiness for change are calculated by subtracting pre contemplation items from the other summed items. Scores range from -2 to 14, with higher scores indicating greater readiness for change.
Apathy Evaluation ScaleFour monthsThe Apathy Evaluation Scale is an 18-item measure of an individual's deficits in goal-directed thoughts and behavior. Scores range from 18-72, with higher scores reflecting more apathy.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Treatment Acceptability/ Adherence ScaleImmediately after session 1The Treatment Acceptability/ Adherence Scale is a 10-item self-report measure of a patient's perception of the acceptability of a treatment as well as their anticipated adherence to the protocol. Scores range from 10-70, with higher scores indicating greater acceptability and perceived adherence.
Saving Inventory-RevisedFour monthsThe Saving Inventory-Revised is a 23-item measure of the three core hoarding symptoms (urges to save, difficulty discarding, and excessive clutter). Scores range from 0 to 92, with higher scores indicating greater symptom severity.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

12 participants dropped from the study between enrollment and randomization.

Baseline characteristics

Characteristic
Age, Continuous69 Year
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.2
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
28 Participants
Savings Inventory-Revised49.53 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.76
Sex: Female, Male
Female
11 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
8 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 180 / 18
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 180 / 18
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 180 / 18

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jul 17, 2026