Skip to content

Phase 2 Study for SAR443820 in Participants With Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS)

A Phase 2, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of SAR443820 in Adult Participants With Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, Followed by an Open-label Extension

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05237284
Acronym
HIMALAYA
Enrollment
305
Registered
2022-02-14
Start date
2022-04-13
Completion date
2024-03-07
Last updated
2025-03-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis

Brief summary

This was a parallel treatment, Phase 2, randomized, double-blind study to assess the efficacy, safety, tolerability, PK, and PD of twice daily (BID) oral SAR443820 compared with placebo in male and female participants, 18 to 80 years of age with ALS followed by an open-label, long-term extension period. Study ACT16970 consisted of 2 parts (A and B) as follows: Part A was a 24-week, double blind, placebo-controlled part, preceded by a screening period of up to 4 weeks before Day 1. On Day 1 of Part A, participants were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to the SAR443820 treatment arm or matching placebo arm as listed below: * Treatment arm: SAR443820, BID * Placebo arm: Placebo, BID Randomization was stratified by the geographic region of the study site, region of ALS onset (bulbar vs other areas), use of riluzole (yes vs no), use of edaravone (yes vs no) and use of the combination of sodium phenylbutyrate and taurursodiol (named Relyvrio in the United States of America \[USA\] and Albrioza in Canada) (yes vs no). Participants attended in-clinic study assessments at baseline (Day 1), Week 2, Week 4, Week 6, Week 8, Week 10, Week 12, Week 16, Week 20, Week 21, Week 22, Week 23, and Week 24. All ongoing participants at Week 24 rolled to open-label extension Part B. The Week 24 Visit was the end of Part A and the beginning of Part B. Part B was an open-label, long-term extension period that starts from Week 24 and continues up to Week 106. The objectives of Part B were to provide extended access to SAR443820 participants in Part A and to further evaluate the safety and efficacy of long-term SAR443820 treatment. The treatment assignment of participants at randomization in Part A remained blinded to Investigators, participants, and site personnel until the end of Part B. Every participant, except those who discontinued Investigational Medicinal Product (IMP) treatment permanently in Part A, received BID oral tablets of SAR443820 in Part B.

Detailed description

The study duration included an up to 4-week screening period, 24-week double-blind treatment period in Part A, 80-week open-label treatment period in Part B and 2-week post-treatment follow-up period, with a maximum total study duration of 110 weeks.

Interventions

Tablet oral

DRUGPlacebo

Tablet

Sponsors

Sanofi
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of possible, clinically probable ALS, clinically probable laboratory supported ALS, or clinically definite ALS according to the revised version of the El Escorial World Federation of Neurology criteria * Time since onset of first symptom of ALS ≤2 years. * Slow Vital Capacity (SVC) ≥60% of the predicted value. * Had to be able to swallow the study tablets at the screening visit. * Either not currently receiving riluzole or on a stable dose of riluzole for at least 4 weeks before the screening visit. Participants receiving riluzole were expected to remain on the same dose throughout the duration of the study. * Either not currently receiving edaravone or on the approved standard schedule of edaravone treatment. Participants receiving edaravone had to have completed at least 1 cycle of treatment before the screening visit and were expected to continue edaravone treatment throughout the duration of the study. * Either not currently receiving the combination of sodium phenylbutyrate and taurursodiol or on the approved standard schedule of the combination of sodium phenylbutyrate and taurursodiol treatment for at least 4 weeks before the screening visit. Participants receiving the combination of sodium phenylbutyrate and taurursodiol were expected to remain on the approved standard schedule throughout the duration of the study. * Participants with a body weight no less than 45 kg and body mass index no less than 18 kg/m2 at the screening visit * Female participants with childbearing potential were eligible to participate if they were not pregnant or breastfeeding and agreed to use adequate contraceptive method during study intervention period and for at least 32 days after the last dose of study drug. * Male participants had to agree to use highly effective contraceptive method during the study period and for at least 92 days following their last dose of the study drug. Male participants were not donate sperms for the duration of study and 92 days after last dose of study drug.

Exclusion criteria

* A history of seizure (History of febrile seizure during childhood was allowed). * Having central IV lines, such as a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC XE ' PICC ' \\f Abbreviation \\t 'peripherally inserted central catheter' ) or midline or portacath lines. * With significant cognitive impairment, psychiatric disease, other neurodegenerative disorder (eg, Parkinson disease or AD), substance abuse other causes of neuromuscular weakness, or any other condition that would make the participants unsuitable for participating in the study or could interfere with assessment or completing the study in the opinion of the Investigator. * History of recent serious infection (eg, pneumonia, septicemia) within 4 weeks of the screening visit; infection requiring hospitalization or treatment with IV antibiotics, antivirals, or antifungals within 4 weeks of screening; or chronic bacterial infection (such as tuberculosis) deemed unacceptable as per the Investigator's judgment. * With active herpes zoster infection within 2 months prior to the screening visit. * A documented history of attempted suicide within 6 months prior to the screening visit, present with suicidal ideation of category 4 or 5 on the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (CSSRS) , or in the Investigator's judgment are at risk for a suicide attempt. * History of unstable or severe cardiac, pulmonary, oncological, hepatic, or renal disease or another medically significant illness other than ALS precluding their safe participation in this study. * Participants who were pregnant or were currently breastfeeding. * A known history of allergy to any ingredients of SAR443820. * Currently or previously treated with any strong or moderate CYP3A4 inhibitors or strong CYP3A4 inducers within the specified washout period before the screening visit. * Received a live vaccine within 14 days before the screening visit. * Participants with concurrent participation in any other interventional clinical study or who had received treatment with another investigational drug (eg sodium phenylbutyrate or taurursodiol ) within 4 weeks or 5 halflives of the investigational agent before the screening visit, whichever is longer. * Participants who had received stem cell or gene therapy for ALS at any time in the past. * Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) or aspartate aminotransferase (AST) \>3.0 × upper limit of normal (ULN) * Bilirubin \>1.5 × ULN unless the participant had documented Gilbert syndrome (isolated bilirubin \>1.5 × ULN was acceptable if bilirubin was fractionated and direct bilirubin is \<35%) * Serum albumin \<3.5 g/dL * Estimated glomerular filtration rate \<60 mL/min/1.73 m2 (Modification of Diet in Renal Disease \[MDRD\]) The above information was not intended to contain all considerations relevant to a participant's potential participation in a clinical trial.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Part A: Change From Baseline to Week 24 in the Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale Revised (ALSFRS-R) Total ScoreBaseline (Day 1, pre-dose) and Week 24The ALSFRS-R is an instrument to evaluate the functional status of participants with ALS. It consists of 12 items across 4 sub-domains of bodily function: bulbar, fine motor, gross motor, and breathing. Each item was scored on an ordinal scale from 0 (total loss of function) to 4 (no loss of function). The total scores was the sum of the individual items score and it ranges from 0 to 48, with a higher score indicating better function. The analysis was performed using mixed-effect model with repeated measures (MMRM). Baseline was defined as the Day 1 pre-dose value.
Part B: Combined Assessment of the Function and Survival (CAFS) Score at Week 52Week 52The CAFS at Week 52 is a composite endpoint based on time to earlier occurrence of death or permanent assisted ventilation (\>22 hours a day for \>7 consecutive days) and change from baseline in ALSFRS-R score up to Week 52. ALSFRS-R is a rating scale where 12 functions are rated on 5-point scales (from 0 to 4) with a maximum score of 48 (sum of all 12 items), with a higher score indicating better function. Each participant's outcome was compared to every other participant's outcome by time to death or permanent assisted ventilation and change on ALSFRS-R if survived without permanent assisted ventilation, assigned a score which is sum of comparisons (+1 \[better\], 0 \[tie\], -1 \[worse\]), and summed scores were ranked, from 1 to 296 (modified ITT\[mITT\] population) lowest rank corresponds to participant who died first and highest rank to 1 with best ALSFRS-R outcome among those who survived. A higher rank is considered a better outcome.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Part B:Change From Baseline to Weeks 52, 76, and 104 in the Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale Revised (ALSFRS-R) Total ScoreBaseline (Day 1, pre-dose) and Weeks 52, 76 and 104The ALSFRS-R is an instrument to evaluate the functional status of participants with ALS. It consists of 12 items across 4 sub-domains of bodily function: bulbar, fine motor, gross motor, and breathing. Each item was scored on an ordinal scale from 0 (total loss of function) to 4 (no loss of function). The total scores was the sum of the individual items score and it ranges from 0 to 48, with a higher score indicating better function. Baseline was defined as the Day 1 pre-dose value.
Parts A and B: Change From Baseline to Weeks 24, 52, 76, and 104 in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Assessment Questionnaire 5 Items (ALSAQ-5)Baseline (Day 1, pre-dose) and Part A: Week 24, Part B: Weeks 52, 76 and 104The ALSAQ-5 is a patient-reported outcome that consists of 5 items derived from the ALSAQ-40. The 5 items closely resemble those of the 5-dimension scores of the ALSAQ-40: eating and drinking; communication; activities of daily living/independence; physical mobility; and emotional functioning. Each item was scored on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (never) to 4 (always or cannot do at all) according to the frequency of a particular problem. The total scores was the sum of the individual items score and it ranges from 0 to 20, with higher scores indicative of greater physical and emotional limitations. Baseline was defined as the Day 1 pre-dose value.
Parts A and B: Change From Baseline to Weeks 24, 52, 76, and 104 in Percent Predicted Slow Vital Capacity (SVC)Baseline (Day 1, pre-dose) and Part A: Week 24, Part B: Weeks 52, 76 and 104SVC is the maximum volume of air that can be slowly exhaled after slow, maximal inhalation. SVC is measured in participants while they are in an upright position at least 3 trials per assessment or up to 5 trials when the highest and second highest of the first 3 measurements differ by 10% or more. Baseline was defined as the Day 1 pre-dose value.
Parts A and B: Change From Baseline to Weeks 24 and 52 in Serum Neurofilament Light Chain (NfL)Baseline (Day 1, pre-dose) and Part A: Week 24 and Part B: Week 52Serum blood samples were collected at indicated time points to measure changes in NfL, a marker of neuronal injury. Baseline was defined as the Day 1 pre-dose value.
Part A: Combined Assessment of the Function and Survival Score at Week 24Week 24The CAFS at Week 24 is a composite endpoint based on time to earlier occurrence of death or permanent assisted ventilation (\>22 hours a day for \>7 consecutive days) and change from baseline in ALSFRS-R score up to Week 24. ALSFRS-R is a rating scale where 12 functions are rated on 5-point scales (from 0 to 4) with a maximum score of 48 (sum of all 12 items), with a higher score indicating better function. Each participant's outcome was compared to every other participant's outcome by time to death or permanent assisted ventilation and change on ALSFRS-R if survived without permanent assisted ventilation, assigned a score which is sum of comparisons (+1 \[better\], 0 \[tie\], -1 \[worse\]), and summed scores were ranked, from 1 to 296 (mITT population) lowest rank corresponds to participant who died first and highest rank to 1 with best ALSFRS-R outcome among those who survived. A higher rank is considered a better outcome.
Part B: Time From Baseline to Occurrence of Either Death or Permanent Assisted VentilationBaseline (Day 1, pre-dose) up to early termination of study, approximately 84 weeksThe survival endpoint was defined as the time to death or permanent assisted ventilation (\>22 hours a day for \>7 consecutive days), whichever comes first. Baseline was defined as the Day 1 pre-dose value.
Part B: Time From Baseline to the Occurrence of DeathBaseline (Day 1, pre-dose) up to early termination of study, approximately 84 weeksTime to the occurrence of death from baseline due to any reason has been reported. Baseline was defined as the Day 1 pre-dose value.
Parts B and A+B: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs) After SAR443820 InitiationFrom first dose of SAR443820 up to 14 days after last dose of SAR443820 administration in Part B, approximately 82 weeks for Parts A+B combined Arm (SAR443820/SAR443820), approximately 58 weeks for Part B Arm (Placebo/SAR443820)An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study treatment, whether or not considered related to the study treatment. TEAEs were defined as the AEs that developed, worsened or became serious during the treatment-emergent period (defined as time from first administration of study treatment (Day 1) to last administration of study treatment + 14 days). Serious adverse events (SAE): Any AE that at any dose: resulted in death, was life-threatening, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, was a congenital anomaly/birth defect, was a medically important event. All TEAE occurring after SAR443820 initiation are provided for both randomized treatment arms in this endpoint.
Parts A and B: Plasma Concentration of SAR443820Part A: Day 1: 0.25- 1 hour and 1-3 hours post-dose; Weeks 2 and 8: pre-dose; Week 8: 0.25-3 hours post-dose; Part B: Week 28: pre-dosePlasma samples were collected at specified timepoints to determine plasma concentrations of SAR443820.
Part A: Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Muscle StrengthBaseline (Day 1, pre-dose) and Week 24The muscles measured in the study included upper limb and lower-limb muscle groups. Bilateral hand grip were measured using a grip dynamometer and all other muscles were measured using a handheld dynamometer (HHD). Nine upper and lower extremity muscles or muscle groups were examined: shoulder flexion, elbow flexion, wrist extension, first dorsal interosseous contraction, hip flexion, knee extension, and ankle dorsiflexion. Each group was measured at least twice bilaterally and the average of the 2 highest measurements were analyzed. Individual muscles are standardized into the corresponding Z-scores using data from standard sample of healthy participants. A Z-score of 0 in a muscle measurement is equal to the mean of that measurement from the standard sample. Negative numbers indicate decreased muscle strength. For analysis, individual Z-scores were averaged to produce a total megascore including all available muscle groups. Baseline was defined as the Day 1 pre-dose value.
Combined Assessment of the Function and Survival Score at Weeks 76 and 104Weeks 76 and 104The CAFS at Weeks 76 and 106 is a composite endpoint based on time to earlier occurrence of death or permanent assisted ventilation (\>22 hours a day for \>7 consecutive days) and change from baseline in ALSFRS-R score up to Weeks 76 and 104. ALSFRS-R is a rating scale where 12 functions are rated on 5-point scales (from 0 to 4) with a maximum score of 48 (sum of all 12 items), with a higher score indicating better function. Each participant's outcome was compared to every other participant's outcome by time to death or permanent assisted ventilation and change on ALSFRS-R if survived without permanent assisted ventilation, assigned a score which is sum of comparisons (+1 \[better\], 0 \[tie\], -1 \[worse\]), and summed scores were ranked, from 1 to 296 (mITT population) lowest rank corresponds to participant who died first and highest rank to 1 with best ALSFRS-R outcome among those who survived. A higher rank is considered a better outcome.

Countries

Belgium, Canada, China, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Netherlands, Poland, Spain, Sweden, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

This study is double-blind followed by an open-label extension, 2 parts: Part (A and B) conducted at 63 investigational sites in 13 countries. A total of 397 participants were screened between 13 Apr 2022 and 17 July 2023, of which 92 were screen failures. Screen failures were due to not meeting the eligibility criteria.

Pre-assignment details

The study consisted of a screening period (up to 4 weeks prior to randomization), treatment period (a 24-week double-blinded in Part A, an 80-week open-label in Part B), and a 2-week post-treatment follow up period, with a maximum total study duration of 110 weeks. The study was terminated as Part A did not meet the primary endpoint.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Part A: Placebo
Participants received placebo matching to SAR443820 tablet orally BID for 24 weeks in Part A.
102
Part A: SAR443820
Participants received SAR443820 20 mg tablet orally BID for 24 weeks in Part A.
203
Total305

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
Part A (Double-blind Period: 24 Weeks)Adverse Event62000
Part A (Double-blind Period: 24 Weeks)Other0200
Part A (Double-blind Period: 24 Weeks)Poor compliance to protocol0100
Part A (Double-blind Period: 24 Weeks)Withdrawal by Subject81300
Part B (Open-label Period: 80 Weeks)Adverse Event001316
Part B (Open-label Period: 80 Weeks)Other0003
Part B (Open-label Period: 80 Weeks)Poor compliance to protocol0001
Part B (Open-label Period: 80 Weeks)Study terminated by sponsor0064126
Part B (Open-label Period: 80 Weeks)Withdrawal by Subject001121

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPart A: PlaceboPart A: SAR443820Total
Age, Continuous56.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.5
57.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.6
56.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.5
Baseline Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale Revised (ALSFRS-R) Total Score36.23 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5
35.97 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.41
36.06 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.61
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
26 Participants52 Participants78 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
1 Participants3 Participants4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
5 Participants21 Participants26 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
69 Participants126 Participants195 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
38 Participants84 Participants122 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
64 Participants119 Participants183 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
5 / 10211 / 2029 / 7912 / 136
other
Total, other adverse events
56 / 102116 / 20229 / 7943 / 136
serious
Total, serious adverse events
17 / 10234 / 20217 / 7926 / 136

Outcome results

Primary

Part A: Change From Baseline to Week 24 in the Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale Revised (ALSFRS-R) Total Score

The ALSFRS-R is an instrument to evaluate the functional status of participants with ALS. It consists of 12 items across 4 sub-domains of bodily function: bulbar, fine motor, gross motor, and breathing. Each item was scored on an ordinal scale from 0 (total loss of function) to 4 (no loss of function). The total scores was the sum of the individual items score and it ranges from 0 to 48, with a higher score indicating better function. The analysis was performed using mixed-effect model with repeated measures (MMRM). Baseline was defined as the Day 1 pre-dose value.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1, pre-dose) and Week 24

Population: The Intent-to-treat (ITT) population consisted of all randomized participants. Only participants with data collected at Baseline and Week 24 are reported.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Part A: PlaceboPart A: Change From Baseline to Week 24 in the Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale Revised (ALSFRS-R) Total Score-5.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.9
Part A: SAR443820Part A: Change From Baseline to Week 24 in the Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale Revised (ALSFRS-R) Total Score-6.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.4
Comparison: Analysis was performed using MMRM including treatment group, visit, randomization strata of the geographic region, ALS onset region, use of riluzole, use of edaravone, use of the combination of sodium phenylbutyrate and taurursodiol, treatment-by-visit interaction, disease duration, baseline ALSFRS-R score, baseline serum neurofilament light chain (NfL), disease duration-by-visit interaction, baseline NfL-by-visit interaction and baseline ALSFRS-R score-by-visit interaction.p-value: 0.528995% CI: [-1.706, 0.878]MMRM
Primary

Part B: Combined Assessment of the Function and Survival (CAFS) Score at Week 52

The CAFS at Week 52 is a composite endpoint based on time to earlier occurrence of death or permanent assisted ventilation (\>22 hours a day for \>7 consecutive days) and change from baseline in ALSFRS-R score up to Week 52. ALSFRS-R is a rating scale where 12 functions are rated on 5-point scales (from 0 to 4) with a maximum score of 48 (sum of all 12 items), with a higher score indicating better function. Each participant's outcome was compared to every other participant's outcome by time to death or permanent assisted ventilation and change on ALSFRS-R if survived without permanent assisted ventilation, assigned a score which is sum of comparisons (+1 \[better\], 0 \[tie\], -1 \[worse\]), and summed scores were ranked, from 1 to 296 (modified ITT\[mITT\] population) lowest rank corresponds to participant who died first and highest rank to 1 with best ALSFRS-R outcome among those who survived. A higher rank is considered a better outcome.

Time frame: Week 52

Population: The mITT population consisted of all randomized participants who either died or had available baseline and at least 1 post-baseline ALSFRS-R assessment. All participants who had either early termination or who did not enter Part B, were also included in Week 52 analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Part A: PlaceboPart B: Combined Assessment of the Function and Survival (CAFS) Score at Week 52154.89 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 92.16
Part A: SAR443820Part B: Combined Assessment of the Function and Survival (CAFS) Score at Week 52145.24 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 82.09
Comparison: Analysis was performed using rank analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model including treatment group, randomization strata of the geographic region of the study site, ALS onset region (bulbar or other areas), use of riluzole (yes or no), use of edaravone (yes or no), use of the combination of sodium phenylbutyrate and taurursodiol (yes or no), disease duration (from first symptom onset to the screening visit), baseline ALSFRS-R score and baseline NfL.p-value: 0.183ANCOVA
Secondary

Combined Assessment of the Function and Survival Score at Weeks 76 and 104

The CAFS at Weeks 76 and 106 is a composite endpoint based on time to earlier occurrence of death or permanent assisted ventilation (\>22 hours a day for \>7 consecutive days) and change from baseline in ALSFRS-R score up to Weeks 76 and 104. ALSFRS-R is a rating scale where 12 functions are rated on 5-point scales (from 0 to 4) with a maximum score of 48 (sum of all 12 items), with a higher score indicating better function. Each participant's outcome was compared to every other participant's outcome by time to death or permanent assisted ventilation and change on ALSFRS-R if survived without permanent assisted ventilation, assigned a score which is sum of comparisons (+1 \[better\], 0 \[tie\], -1 \[worse\]), and summed scores were ranked, from 1 to 296 (mITT population) lowest rank corresponds to participant who died first and highest rank to 1 with best ALSFRS-R outcome among those who survived. A higher rank is considered a better outcome.

Time frame: Weeks 76 and 104

Population: The mITT population consisted of all randomized participants who either died or had available baseline and at least 1 post-baseline ALSFRS-R assessment. Only participants with data collected at specified timepoints are reported. The study was terminated prematurely since the Part A did not meet the primary endpoint. The data for Week 104 was not collected. All participants who had either early termination or who did not enter Part B, were also included in Week 76 analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Part A: PlaceboCombined Assessment of the Function and Survival Score at Weeks 76 and 104Week 76155.54 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 92.17
Part A: SAR443820Combined Assessment of the Function and Survival Score at Weeks 76 and 104Week 76144.91 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 82.04
Secondary

Part A: Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Muscle Strength

The muscles measured in the study included upper limb and lower-limb muscle groups. Bilateral hand grip were measured using a grip dynamometer and all other muscles were measured using a handheld dynamometer (HHD). Nine upper and lower extremity muscles or muscle groups were examined: shoulder flexion, elbow flexion, wrist extension, first dorsal interosseous contraction, hip flexion, knee extension, and ankle dorsiflexion. Each group was measured at least twice bilaterally and the average of the 2 highest measurements were analyzed. Individual muscles are standardized into the corresponding Z-scores using data from standard sample of healthy participants. A Z-score of 0 in a muscle measurement is equal to the mean of that measurement from the standard sample. Negative numbers indicate decreased muscle strength. For analysis, individual Z-scores were averaged to produce a total megascore including all available muscle groups. Baseline was defined as the Day 1 pre-dose value.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1, pre-dose) and Week 24

Population: The ITT population consisted of all randomized participants. Only participants with data collected at Baseline and Week 24 are reported.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Part A: PlaceboPart A: Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Muscle Strength-0.498 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.96
Part A: SAR443820Part A: Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Muscle Strength-0.495 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.704
Comparison: Analysis was performed using MMRM including treatment group, visit, randomization strata of the geographic region, ALS onset region, use of riluzole, use of edaravone, use of the combination of sodium phenylbutyrate and taurursodiol, treatment-by-visit interaction, disease duration, baseline megascore, baseline NfL, disease duration-by-visit interaction, baseline NfL-by-visit interaction and baseline megascore-by-visit interaction.p-value: 0.956595% CI: [-0.193, 0.183]MMRM
Secondary

Part A: Combined Assessment of the Function and Survival Score at Week 24

The CAFS at Week 24 is a composite endpoint based on time to earlier occurrence of death or permanent assisted ventilation (\>22 hours a day for \>7 consecutive days) and change from baseline in ALSFRS-R score up to Week 24. ALSFRS-R is a rating scale where 12 functions are rated on 5-point scales (from 0 to 4) with a maximum score of 48 (sum of all 12 items), with a higher score indicating better function. Each participant's outcome was compared to every other participant's outcome by time to death or permanent assisted ventilation and change on ALSFRS-R if survived without permanent assisted ventilation, assigned a score which is sum of comparisons (+1 \[better\], 0 \[tie\], -1 \[worse\]), and summed scores were ranked, from 1 to 296 (mITT population) lowest rank corresponds to participant who died first and highest rank to 1 with best ALSFRS-R outcome among those who survived. A higher rank is considered a better outcome.

Time frame: Week 24

Population: The mITT population consisted of all randomized participants who either died or had available baseline and at least 1 post-baseline ALSFRS-R assessment. Only participants with data collected at Week 24 is reported. The study was terminated prematurely since the Part A did not meet the primary endpoint.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Part A: PlaceboPart A: Combined Assessment of the Function and Survival Score at Week 24151.19 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 90.71
Part A: SAR443820Part A: Combined Assessment of the Function and Survival Score at Week 24147.13 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 83.06
Comparison: CAFS at Week 24 was analyzed using the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test to compare mean scores between the treatment groups at Week 24.p-value: 0.6999Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Part B:Change From Baseline to Weeks 52, 76, and 104 in the Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale Revised (ALSFRS-R) Total Score

The ALSFRS-R is an instrument to evaluate the functional status of participants with ALS. It consists of 12 items across 4 sub-domains of bodily function: bulbar, fine motor, gross motor, and breathing. Each item was scored on an ordinal scale from 0 (total loss of function) to 4 (no loss of function). The total scores was the sum of the individual items score and it ranges from 0 to 48, with a higher score indicating better function. Baseline was defined as the Day 1 pre-dose value.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1, pre-dose) and Weeks 52, 76 and 104

Population: The ITT population consisted of all randomized participants. Only participants with data collected at specified timepoints are reported. The study was terminated prematurely since the Part A did not meet the primary endpoint. The data for Week 104 was not collected.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Part A: PlaceboPart B:Change From Baseline to Weeks 52, 76, and 104 in the Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale Revised (ALSFRS-R) Total ScoreWeek 52-11.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.8
Part A: PlaceboPart B:Change From Baseline to Weeks 52, 76, and 104 in the Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale Revised (ALSFRS-R) Total ScoreWeek 76-12.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.1
Part A: SAR443820Part B:Change From Baseline to Weeks 52, 76, and 104 in the Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale Revised (ALSFRS-R) Total ScoreWeek 52-12.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8
Part A: SAR443820Part B:Change From Baseline to Weeks 52, 76, and 104 in the Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale Revised (ALSFRS-R) Total ScoreWeek 76-13.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9
Secondary

Part B: Time From Baseline to Occurrence of Either Death or Permanent Assisted Ventilation

The survival endpoint was defined as the time to death or permanent assisted ventilation (\>22 hours a day for \>7 consecutive days), whichever comes first. Baseline was defined as the Day 1 pre-dose value.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1, pre-dose) up to early termination of study, approximately 84 weeks

Population: The ITT population consisted of all randomized participants. Only participants with data collected at specified timepoints are reported.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Part A: PlaceboPart B: Time From Baseline to Occurrence of Either Death or Permanent Assisted Ventilation31.90 weeksStandard Deviation 16.71
Part A: SAR443820Part B: Time From Baseline to Occurrence of Either Death or Permanent Assisted Ventilation31.54 weeksStandard Deviation 18.82
Secondary

Part B: Time From Baseline to the Occurrence of Death

Time to the occurrence of death from baseline due to any reason has been reported. Baseline was defined as the Day 1 pre-dose value.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1, pre-dose) up to early termination of study, approximately 84 weeks

Population: The ITT population consisted of all randomized participants. Only participants with data collected at specified timepoints are reported.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Part A: PlaceboPart B: Time From Baseline to the Occurrence of Death38.30 weeksStandard Deviation 16.45
Part A: SAR443820Part B: Time From Baseline to the Occurrence of Death29.93 weeksStandard Deviation 17.13
Secondary

Parts A and B: Change From Baseline to Weeks 24, 52, 76, and 104 in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Assessment Questionnaire 5 Items (ALSAQ-5)

The ALSAQ-5 is a patient-reported outcome that consists of 5 items derived from the ALSAQ-40. The 5 items closely resemble those of the 5-dimension scores of the ALSAQ-40: eating and drinking; communication; activities of daily living/independence; physical mobility; and emotional functioning. Each item was scored on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (never) to 4 (always or cannot do at all) according to the frequency of a particular problem. The total scores was the sum of the individual items score and it ranges from 0 to 20, with higher scores indicative of greater physical and emotional limitations. Baseline was defined as the Day 1 pre-dose value.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1, pre-dose) and Part A: Week 24, Part B: Weeks 52, 76 and 104

Population: The ITT population consisted of all randomized participants. Only participants with data collected at specified timepoints are reported. The study was terminated prematurely since the Part A did not meet the primary endpoint. The data for Week 104 was not collected.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Part A: PlaceboParts A and B: Change From Baseline to Weeks 24, 52, 76, and 104 in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Assessment Questionnaire 5 Items (ALSAQ-5)Week 242.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.1
Part A: SAR443820Parts A and B: Change From Baseline to Weeks 24, 52, 76, and 104 in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Assessment Questionnaire 5 Items (ALSAQ-5)Week 242.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.1
Part B: Placebo/SAR443820Parts A and B: Change From Baseline to Weeks 24, 52, 76, and 104 in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Assessment Questionnaire 5 Items (ALSAQ-5)Week 524.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.2
Part B: Placebo/SAR443820Parts A and B: Change From Baseline to Weeks 24, 52, 76, and 104 in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Assessment Questionnaire 5 Items (ALSAQ-5)Week 765.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.5
Part B: SAR443820/SAR443820Parts A and B: Change From Baseline to Weeks 24, 52, 76, and 104 in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Assessment Questionnaire 5 Items (ALSAQ-5)Week 524.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.5
Part B: SAR443820/SAR443820Parts A and B: Change From Baseline to Weeks 24, 52, 76, and 104 in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Assessment Questionnaire 5 Items (ALSAQ-5)Week 765.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.3
Comparison: Analysis was performed using MMRM including treatment group, visit, randomization strata of the geographic region, ALS onset region, use of riluzole, use of edaravone, use of the combination of sodium phenylbutyrate and taurursodiol, treatment-by-visit interaction, disease duration, baseline ALSFRS-R score, baseline NfL, disease duration-by-visit interaction, and baseline ALSFRS-R score-by-visit interaction.p-value: 0.218295% CI: [-0.31, 1.35]MMRM
Secondary

Parts A and B: Change From Baseline to Weeks 24, 52, 76, and 104 in Percent Predicted Slow Vital Capacity (SVC)

SVC is the maximum volume of air that can be slowly exhaled after slow, maximal inhalation. SVC is measured in participants while they are in an upright position at least 3 trials per assessment or up to 5 trials when the highest and second highest of the first 3 measurements differ by 10% or more. Baseline was defined as the Day 1 pre-dose value.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1, pre-dose) and Part A: Week 24, Part B: Weeks 52, 76 and 104

Population: The ITT population consisted of all randomized participants. Only participants with data collected at specified timepoints are reported. The study was terminated prematurely since the Part A did not meet the primary endpoint. The data for Week 104 was not collected.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Part A: PlaceboParts A and B: Change From Baseline to Weeks 24, 52, 76, and 104 in Percent Predicted Slow Vital Capacity (SVC)Week 24-13.43 percentage of predicted volumeStandard Deviation 14.66
Part A: SAR443820Parts A and B: Change From Baseline to Weeks 24, 52, 76, and 104 in Percent Predicted Slow Vital Capacity (SVC)Week 24-11.24 percentage of predicted volumeStandard Deviation 13.35
Part B: Placebo/SAR443820Parts A and B: Change From Baseline to Weeks 24, 52, 76, and 104 in Percent Predicted Slow Vital Capacity (SVC)Week 76-31.30 percentage of predicted volumeStandard Deviation 30.72
Part B: Placebo/SAR443820Parts A and B: Change From Baseline to Weeks 24, 52, 76, and 104 in Percent Predicted Slow Vital Capacity (SVC)Week 52-22.44 percentage of predicted volumeStandard Deviation 16.35
Part B: SAR443820/SAR443820Parts A and B: Change From Baseline to Weeks 24, 52, 76, and 104 in Percent Predicted Slow Vital Capacity (SVC)Week 52-18.29 percentage of predicted volumeStandard Deviation 15.75
Part B: SAR443820/SAR443820Parts A and B: Change From Baseline to Weeks 24, 52, 76, and 104 in Percent Predicted Slow Vital Capacity (SVC)Week 76-22.68 percentage of predicted volumeStandard Deviation 15.93
Comparison: Analysis was performed using MMRM including treatment group, visit, randomization strata of the geographic region, ALS onset region, use of riluzole, use of edaravone, use of the combination of sodium phenylbutyrate and taurursodiol, treatment-by-visit interaction, disease duration, baseline SVC, baseline NfL, disease duration-by-visit interaction, baseline NfL-by-visit interaction, and baseline SVC-by-visit interaction.p-value: 0.813495% CI: [-3.075, 3.914]MMRM
Secondary

Parts A and B: Change From Baseline to Weeks 24 and 52 in Serum Neurofilament Light Chain (NfL)

Serum blood samples were collected at indicated time points to measure changes in NfL, a marker of neuronal injury. Baseline was defined as the Day 1 pre-dose value.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1, pre-dose) and Part A: Week 24 and Part B: Week 52

Population: The ITT population consisted of all randomized participants. Only participants with data collected at specified timepoints are reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Part A: PlaceboParts A and B: Change From Baseline to Weeks 24 and 52 in Serum Neurofilament Light Chain (NfL)Week 241.016 picograms per milliliter (pg/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 5853.645
Part A: SAR443820Parts A and B: Change From Baseline to Weeks 24 and 52 in Serum Neurofilament Light Chain (NfL)Week 240.996 picograms per milliliter (pg/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 6136.969
Part B: Placebo/SAR443820Parts A and B: Change From Baseline to Weeks 24 and 52 in Serum Neurofilament Light Chain (NfL)Week 520.925 picograms per milliliter (pg/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation -709.957
Part B: SAR443820/SAR443820Parts A and B: Change From Baseline to Weeks 24 and 52 in Serum Neurofilament Light Chain (NfL)Week 520.887 picograms per milliliter (pg/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation -1488.592
Comparison: Analysis was performed using MMRM including treatment group, visit, randomization strata of the geographic region, ALS onset region, use of riluzole, use of edaravone, use of the combination of sodium phenylbutyrate and taurursodiol, treatment-by-visit interaction, disease duration, log transformed baseline NfL, disease duration-by-visit interaction, and log transformed baseline NfL-by-visit interaction.p-value: 0.235695% CI: [0.899, 1.027]MMRM
Secondary

Parts A and B: Plasma Concentration of SAR443820

Plasma samples were collected at specified timepoints to determine plasma concentrations of SAR443820.

Time frame: Part A: Day 1: 0.25- 1 hour and 1-3 hours post-dose; Weeks 2 and 8: pre-dose; Week 8: 0.25-3 hours post-dose; Part B: Week 28: pre-dose

Population: Pharmacokinetic (PK) population consisted of all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of SAR443820 and had at least 1 PK assessment with adequate documentation of dosing and sampling. It was prespecified (statistical analysis plan) that participants will be analyzed according to actual intervention received. In Part B, all participants received SAR443820, so data were combined. Only participants who received SAR443820 with data collected at specified timepoints are reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Part A: PlaceboParts A and B: Plasma Concentration of SAR443820Day 1: 0.25- 1 hours post-dose181.500 nanogram (ng)/mLStandard Deviation 169.94
Part A: PlaceboParts A and B: Plasma Concentration of SAR443820Day 1: 1-3 hours post-dose250.188 nanogram (ng)/mLStandard Deviation 95.867
Part A: PlaceboParts A and B: Plasma Concentration of SAR443820Week 2: pre-dose165.833 nanogram (ng)/mLStandard Deviation 91.355
Part A: PlaceboParts A and B: Plasma Concentration of SAR443820Week 8: pre-dose165.089 nanogram (ng)/mLStandard Deviation 92.686
Part A: PlaceboParts A and B: Plasma Concentration of SAR443820Week 8: 0.25- 3 hours post-dose365.488 nanogram (ng)/mLStandard Deviation 198.609
Part A: SAR443820Parts A and B: Plasma Concentration of SAR443820Week 28: pre-dose171.865 nanogram (ng)/mLStandard Deviation 104.304
Secondary

Parts B and A+B: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs) After SAR443820 Initiation

An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study treatment, whether or not considered related to the study treatment. TEAEs were defined as the AEs that developed, worsened or became serious during the treatment-emergent period (defined as time from first administration of study treatment (Day 1) to last administration of study treatment + 14 days). Serious adverse events (SAE): Any AE that at any dose: resulted in death, was life-threatening, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, was a congenital anomaly/birth defect, was a medically important event. All TEAE occurring after SAR443820 initiation are provided for both randomized treatment arms in this endpoint.

Time frame: From first dose of SAR443820 up to 14 days after last dose of SAR443820 administration in Part B, approximately 82 weeks for Parts A+B combined Arm (SAR443820/SAR443820), approximately 58 weeks for Part B Arm (Placebo/SAR443820)

Population: The safety population consisted of all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose (including partial dose) of SAR443820. All participants from safety population and treated with SAR443820 are included in Part B arm and participants from safety population are included in Parts A+B arm. The combined safety analysis for TEAE provided the accurate summary of all TEAE in both treatment groups after the initiation of SAR443820.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Part A: PlaceboParts B and A+B: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs) After SAR443820 InitiationTEAEs51 Participants
Part A: PlaceboParts B and A+B: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs) After SAR443820 InitiationTESAEs13 Participants
Part A: SAR443820Parts B and A+B: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs) After SAR443820 InitiationTEAEs183 Participants
Part A: SAR443820Parts B and A+B: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs) After SAR443820 InitiationTESAEs53 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 9, 2026