Skip to content

Better Understand Motor Deficits Associated With Autism Spectrum Disorders: Development of an Assessment Protocol

Better Understand Motor Deficits Associated With Autism Spectrum Disorders: Development of an Assessment Protocol

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05236803
Acronym
MOTRICITE TSA
Enrollment
110
Registered
2022-02-11
Start date
2022-02-07
Completion date
2027-03-31
Last updated
2026-03-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Autism Spectrum Disorder

Keywords

Autisme Spectrum Disorders, Motricity, Cognitive disorders, Behaviour, motor skill differences

Brief summary

This research is a case-control study aiming to characterize motor peculiarities (objective quantitative and qualitative measures) and its psycho-physiological correlates of children with ASD.

Detailed description

The main objective is to measure jointly and in an automated and standardized manner the performance and motor patterns within the framework of tasks measuring the performance and patterns of general motor skills (postures, walking, coordination overall), fine motor skills (graphics, pointing task) and oculomotricity (visual orientation and control). The secondary objective is to investigate the relationships between motor difficulties and cognitive and social disorders found in children with ASD. * Compare the motor performance data in the 3 major motor domains with each other (overall, fine and oculomotor); * Evaluate intergroup differences based on clinical characteristics (ADOS-2, ADI-R, CARS 2 scores), age, IQ, socio-communication profile score (SRS-2) and presence comorbidities (TADH, TDC).

Interventions

BEHAVIORALTesting of general motor skills, fine motor skills and occulomotricity

Recording of participant's performance during eye, fine motor and gross motor tests; Children's gross motor skills will be assessed through a biomechanical analysis. Eye movements will be recorded using the eye-tracking system (Tobii Pro TX300). The technique used is the corneal reflection technique.

BEHAVIORALQuestionnaires

Passing self and hetero questionnaires.

Sponsors

Centre Hospitalier Charles Perrens, Bordeaux
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
6 Years to 11 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

: All participants : * Be between 6 and 11 years old * Mastery of the French language * Be affiliated with a Social Security scheme or benefit from affiliation by a third person * Both parents (or the holder of legal authority) have read, understood and signed the study consent * Be affiliated with social security Participants with ASD should also verify the following inclusion criteria: * Being diagnosed with ASD (DSM-V)

Exclusion criteria

: All participants : * Refusal to participate in the research on the part of the participant and / or holders of parental authority. * Be a person benefiting from enhanced protection, namely : persons deprived of their liberty by a judicial or administrative decision, persons staying in a health or social establishment. * Have uncorrected visual or hearing problems * To have concomitant psychotropic drug treatments not stabilized, initiated in the last 2 months: antipsychotics, mood stabilizers, anti-epileptics, psychostimulants, antidepressants. * Have a motor handicap of the upper or lower limbs, fitted or not. * Have diagnosed neurological or psychiatric disorders, present a general or metabolic pathology having a known impact on the child's motor skills (eg: Epilepsy, Tics and Gilles de la Tourette Syndrome, Intellectual Deficiency, Neuromuscular Syndrome, Metabolic Neurological Syndrome , neoplasms) * Suspicion of low intellectual efficiency if at least one of the two subtests (Similarities or Matrices) of WISC V (retrieved from the medical file if the TSA participant) presents a result (standard score) strictly lower than 7. Participants without ASD : * Participant with ADHD (Attention Deficit Disorder with or without Hyperactivity) or CDD (Developmental Coordination Disorder)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Measurement performance of fine motor skills (graphics, pointing task)At 3 monthJointly and in an automated and standardized manner, measure performance in the context of tasks measuring the performance and patterns of general motor skills (postures, walking, overall coordination), fine motor skills (graphics, pointing task) and oculomotricity (visual orientation and control).
Measurement performance of general motor skills with biomechanical analysisAt 3 monthJointly and in an automated and standardized manner, measure motor patterns in the context of tasks measuring the performance and patterns of general motor skills (postures, walking, overall coordination), fine motor skills (graphics, pointing task) and oculomotricity (visual orientation and control).
Measurement of oculomotricity with eye-tracking system (visual orientation and control)At 3 monthJointly and in an automated and standardized manner, motor patterns in the context of tasks measuring the performance and patterns of general motor skills (postures, walking, overall coordination), fine motor skills (graphics, pointing task) and oculomotricity (visual orientation and control).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Motor performance : success, error rate (%)At visit 1 and visit 2, an average of 3 months
Motor performance : task duration (ms), reaction time (ms) and latency (ms)At visit 1 and visit 2, an average of 3 months
IQ as assessed using WISC IVAt visit 1 and visit 2, an average of 3 months
Score of socio-communicative skills as assessed using Social Responsiveness ScaleAt visit 1 and visit 2, an average of 3 monthsSocial Responsiveness Scale : Min = 30, Max=90 Higher scores mean a worse outcome
ADHD as assessed using Conners-3At visit 1 and visit 2, an average of 3 months
Developmental Coordination Disorder as assessed using Developmental Coordination Disorder QuestionnaireAt visit 1 and visit 2, an average of 3 monthsDevelopmental Coordination Disorder Questionnaire : Min = 15, Max = 75 Higher scores mean a better outcome
ASD Clinical Assessment as assessed using Childhood Autism Rating ScaleAt visit 1 and visit 2, an average of 3 monthsChildhood Autism Rating Scale : Min = 0, Max = 100 Higher scores mean a worse outcome

Countries

France

Contacts

CONTACTAnouck AMESTOY, MD
aamestoy@ch-perrens.fr05 56 56 67 19
CONTACTHelen SAVARIEAU
hsavarieau@ch-perrens.fr05 56 56 35 56
STUDY_DIRECTORAnouck AMESTOY, MD

Physician

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 17, 2026