Skip to content

Treatment to Promote Self-regulation in Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder

Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation to Promote Helpful Self-regulatory Behaviour in Children and Youth With Autism Spectrum Disorder

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05235919
Enrollment
50
Registered
2022-02-11
Start date
2022-09-22
Completion date
2025-02-28
Last updated
2024-07-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Autism Spectrum Disorder, Self-Regulation, Emotion

Keywords

transcranial magnetic stimulation, rTMS, MRI

Brief summary

This study will evaluate the feasibility of repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) in Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) with self-regulation impairment. Baseline and follow-up participant visits will include behavioral assessments of self-regulation and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to determine neurophysiological outcomes before and after rTMS treatment.

Detailed description

Children and youth with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) often present with co-morbid impairments in self-regulation (e.g., difficulty managing their emotions) resulting in unhelpful regulatory approaches such as disruptive compulsive, aggressive and self-injurious behaviour. There is an urgent need to establish novel, precise and effective interventions that promote self-regulation and reduce disruptive behaviours. This project will collect pilot data on the effects of repetitive TMS in reducing disruptive behaviours in youth with ASD, in order to inform the design of a follow-up full-scale clinical trial. Youth with ASD who experience clinically significant difficulties with self-regulation and disruptive behaviour will be recruited. Participants will be randomized to rTMS or sham rTMS for 3 weeks. The overall feasibility of the trial will be assessed. The effect of rTMS on the brain mechanisms of self-regulation and clinical improvement in disruptive behaviours will also be measured. Neurophysiological outcomes, including changes in regional brain network activity for inhibition of behaviour, will be explored.

Interventions

DEVICErepetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS)

30 minutes rTMS session 5 days/week for 3 weeks.

OTHERSham stimulation

30 minutes sham stimulation 5 days/week for 3 weeks.

Sponsors

Centre for Addiction and Mental Health
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Toronto
CollaboratorOTHER
Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Participants and outcomes assessor will be blind to rTMS or sham condition.

Intervention model description

Randomized sham-controlled rTMS trial

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
9 Years to 18 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Children with a diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder and self-regulation impairment or challenges * Able to participate in rTMS

Exclusion criteria

* Children with autism spectrum disorder but no co-morbid self-regulation disorders. * Children with contraindications to TMS (history of seizures, family history of seizures, metal implants) * Co-existing neurological conditions (epilepsy, stroke, etc.)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
RecruitmentWeeks 1-18Recruitment rates of 4 participants/month are achieved with a ≥ 20% response rate
AttritionWeeks 1-18Attrition rates of less than 10% (i.e., ≥90% of participants successfully complete assessments).
AdherenceWeeks 1-1890% of participants who complete assessment achieve the target intensity and dose (15 rTMS sessions)
Blinding successWeeks 1-18Blinding of participants and their parents/caregivers and required study team members will be assessed using a Blinding Questionnaire indicating the perceived group membership (rTMS/sham)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall Clinical ChangeWeeks 1, 6, 18Clinical Global Impression scale - 1 item on a scale from 0-7 (a change of 0.5 indicates a clinical impact of significance)
Inhibitory controlWeeks 1, 6, 18Go/No-Go Task Performance
Clinical Measure of Self-regulation: Emotion Dysregulation Index Reactivity and DysphoriaWeeks 1, 6, 18Change in total score on Reactivity (0-96) and Dysphoria (0-24) scales - greater scores indicates a worse outcome
Structural brain changes (magnetic resonance imaging)Weeks 1, 6, 18Diffusion imaging - change in fractional anisotropy
Functional brain changes (magnetic resonance imaging)Weeks 1, 6, 18change in blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD) signal associated with go/no-go task
Clinical Measure of Self-Regulation: The Response To Stress Questionnaire - Family StressWeeks 1, 6, 18Change in total score Response To Stress Questionnaire Family Stress Version (57-228, greater score indicates worse a outcome)
Clinical Measure of Self-regulation: Aberrant Behaviour Checklist - Irritability SubscaleWeeks 1, 6, 18Change in total score on Aberrant Behaviour Checklist - Irritability Subscale (15-60, greater score indicates a worse outcome)
Clinical Measure of Self-regulation: Emotional Regulation ChecklistWeeks 1, 6, 18change in total score on Emotional Regulation Checklist (24-96, low scores indicate worse outcomes)

Countries

Canada

Contacts

Primary ContactDeryk Beal, PhD
dbeal@hollandbloorview.ca416-425-6220

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026