Skip to content

Platelet-Rich Plasma Epidural Injection an Emerging Strategy in Lumbar Disc Herniation

Platelet-Rich Plasma Transforaminal Epidural Injection an Emerging Strategy in Lumbar Disc Herniation

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05234840
Enrollment
30
Registered
2022-02-10
Start date
2019-04-01
Completion date
2021-06-30
Last updated
2022-02-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

PRP

Keywords

PRP, HNP, lumbar HNP

Brief summary

To evaluate the efficacy of platelet-rich plasma (PRP; double-spin) in treatment of single-level lumbar herniated nucleus pulposus (HNP) in comparison to triamcinolone. RCT was conducted with 30 patients included.

Detailed description

The study was a randomized controlled trial, triple-blind, single-center/surgeon/assessor. The study was conducted between April 2019 to May 2021. We evaluated 30 patients (both genders) aged 20-55 years, having failed conservative treatment of unilateral HNP undergone for at least 6 weeks, with visual analogue scale (VAS) of greater than 30, and confirmed a single-level HNP, corelated to clinical, by MRI. The exclusion criteria included previous spine surgery or epidural injection, progressive neurological deficit, cauda equina, coagulopathy-related conditions, associated cervical myelopathy, systemic bone and joint diseases. All patients had to have been exempted from NSAIDs for at least one week. Patients were treated by transforaminal epidural injections. Fifteen patients were in triamcinolone and PRP groups each. PRP was obtained from 24 ml venous blood through standardized double-spin protocol. Participants were fifteen patients each in triamcinolone and PRP groups. The same postoperative protocols and medications were applied. The visual analogue scale of leg (LegVAS), collected at baseline, 2, 6, 12, and 24 weeks, was the primary outcome. The BackVAS, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), adverse event, and treatment failure were the secondary endpoints. All subjects were analyzed according to the intention-to-treat principle. All statistical analyses were performed with STATA 17.

Interventions

DRUGplatelet rich plasma

1\. 26 ml of blood was obtained from each patient (6ml each in 4 CPDA and 2ml in EDTA for CBC) 2. First-spin of 900g for 5 minutes (Kokusan, H-19alpha, 25°C) 3. Three layers formed: transfer top layer (platelet poor plasma) and middle layer (platelets and WBC) to another sterile tube (about 3.3 ml), discard bottom layer (RBC) 4. Second-spin of 1000g for 10 minutes 5. The upper one third was discarded (platelet poor plasma) by pipet, the remaining was mixed by turning 10 times 6. Total 4 ml of PRP

DRUGTriamcinolone

40 mg triamcinolone with 1% lidocaine, total of 2 ml

Sponsors

Queen Savang Vadhana Memorial Hospital, Thailand
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

all patient were masked. Surgeon was blinded by leukostrip around injection syringe. Assessor was blinded from operative information.

Intervention model description

Thirty patients were treated by transforaminal epidural injections. Fifteen patients were in triamcinolone and PRP groups each. PRP was obtained from 24 ml venous blood through standardized double-spin protocol. Participants were fifteen patients each in triamcinolone and PRP groups. The same postoperative protocols and medications were applied. The visual analogue scale of leg (LegVAS), collected at baseline, 2, 6, 12, and 24 weeks, was the primary outcome.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 55 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age 20-55 years * Having failed conservative treatment for at least 6 weeks * Visual analogue scale (VAS) of greater than 30 * Confirmed a single-level HNP, corelated to clinical, by MRI.

Exclusion criteria

* Previous spine surgery or epidural injection * Progressive neurological deficit * Cauda equina * Coagulopathy-related conditions * Associated cervical myelopathy * Systemic bone and joint diseases

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
VAS of leg painat 24 weeks0-100 (visual analog score, 0 is the minimum and 100 is the maximum)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
VAS of backat 24 weeks0-100 (visual analog score, 0 is the minimum and 100 is the maximum)
ODIat 24 weeksOswestry Disability Index 0-100% (0 is the minimum and 100 is the maximum)
adverse eventup to 24 weeksminor and major complications from injection
Rate of treatment failure [participant who require reinjection or operation]up to 24 weeksDuring follow-up period, participant require either re-injection or operation \[yes/no\]

Countries

Thailand

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 9, 2026