Skip to content

Trial Evaluating the Tailored Versus the Systematic Use of Defunctioning Stoma After Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer (GRECCAR17)

A Phase III Randomized Trial Evaluating the Tailored Versus the Systematic Use of Defunctioning Stoma After Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05233787
Acronym
GRECCAR17
Enrollment
212
Registered
2022-02-10
Start date
2022-03-24
Completion date
2025-09-30
Last updated
2024-05-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Ileostomy; Functional Disturbance, Rectal Cancer

Keywords

Rectal Cancer, Defunctioning stoma, Quality of life, Pelvic sepsis, Functional outcomes

Brief summary

GRECCAR 17 will be the first prospective and randomized trial to assess a tailored policy in the use of defunctioning stoma after TME according to the personalized risk of anastomotic leakage. The tailored use of defunctioning stoma after TME for rectal cancer should improve both the quality of life of patients and the anorectal function, without any impact on anastomotic leakage. Moreover, for the healthcare system, this new approach could be a cost-effective strategy, leading to a decrease in healthcare expenses. The main objective is to compare the impact of tailored defunctioning stoma after TME for rectal cancer versus the systematic use of defunctioning stoma on the evolution of the specific Quality Of Life (QLQC30) during the 12 months after surgery.

Detailed description

The introduction of Total Mesorectal Excision (TME) as the surgical procedure of choice for low and mid rectal cancer has led to decrease local recurrence and improved oncological results. Postoperative morbidity remains a major issue, and the most feared complication is anastomotic leakage. The systematic use of a defunctioning stoma during 3 months to protect low colorectal anastomosis (below than 7 cm from the anal verge) is the standard of practice after TME surgery in order to decrease risks of anastomotic leakage and urgent re-operations. However, there have been a lot of controversies surrounding the role of defunctioning stoma mainly due to stoma-related complications, ranked from 20% to 60%, which may lead to prolonged inpatient care, urgent re-operation and devastating effects on quality of life (QOL) and healthcare expenses. Moreover, it has been reported that patients either without defunctioning stoma, or with early stoma closure (days 8-12 after TME) have a better functional outcomes than patients with systematic defunctioning stoma for 3 months. The experimental arm (arm A) will benefit from a tailored use of defunctioning stoma after TME based on a 2-step process: i) to perform or not a defunctioning stoma according to the personalized risk of anastomotic leakage (defunctioning stoma only if Anastomotic Failure Observed Risk Score=\[2-6\]), ii) to perform an early stoma closure at day 8-12, according to clinical (fever), biological (CRP level days 2 and 4 postoperatively) and radiological postoperative assessment (CT-scan with colonic contrast retrograde enema day 7-8 postoperatively). The control arm (arm B) will benefit from systematic use of defunctioning stoma for 2-3 months after TME, according to French national and international guidelines. Patients will be followed at 1, 4, 8 and 12 months after surgery, with chest, abdominal and pelvic scan and tumour markers.

Interventions

PROCEDURETailored use of defunctioning stoma after TME

Tailored use of defunctioning stoma after TME based on a 2-step process: i) to perform or not a defunctioning stoma according to the personalized risk of anastomotic leakage (defunctioning stoma only if Anastomotic Failure Observed Risk Score=\[2-6\]), ii) to perform an early stoma closure at day 8-12, according to clinical (fever), biological (CRP level days 2 and 4 postoperatively) and radiological postoperative assessment (CT-scan with colonic contrast retrograde enema day 7-8 postoperatively)

PROCEDURESystematic use of defunctioning stoma

Systematic use of defunctioning stoma for 2-3 months after TME, according to French national and international guidelines

Sponsors

University Hospital, Bordeaux
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age 18-80 years; * Rectal adenocarcinoma (histologically proven) * No metastasis or medical history of colorectal metastasis (M0) * Patients with rectal cancer \< 12 cm from the anal verge (determined by rectal examination or MRI) * Patients operated on by mini-invasive TME (laparoscopic, robotic or TaTME); * With or without neo adjuvant treatment * Realize a stapling anastomosis \< 7 cm from the anal verge (determined by rectal examination or MRI) * Patients with expected defunctioning ileostomy * Appropriate hematologic function: hemoglobin ≥ 10.5 g/dL, leukocytes \> 4000/mm3, blood platelets \> 100,000/mm3); * Appropriate renal function (serum creatinine \< 15 mg/dL); * Effective contraception of childbearing age : Male patients and premenopausal women should agree to use two medically validated contraceptive methods (one for the patient et one for the partner) during the study * Patient affiliated or beneficiary to a health security system; * Patient and doctor have signed informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with rectal cancer requiring TME surgery with handsewn anastomosis; * Patients operated on by open approach; * Previous pelvic irradiation for reasons other than rectal cancer * Concomitant cancer or medical history of cancer within 5 years other than cancers treated in situ (cervical carcinoma or basocellular carcinoma or spinocellular carcinoma) * Patients with expected defunctioning colostomy; * Patients with perforated rectal cancer or preoperative pelvic sepsis; * Patients with inflammatory bowel disease and/or bowel obstruction, * Patients operated on in emergency; * Patients with poor nutrition (Albumin \< 34 g/L, pre-Alb \< 0.14 g/L) * Patients with extended-TME or pelvic exenteration (prostate); * Patients with history of heart or vascular ischemia; * Severe heart disease or congestive heart disease; * Patients with immunodeficiency and/or under corticotherapy; * Severe lung disease or respiratory failure; * Severe kidney disease; * Previous disease or disability expected to influence the assessment of postoperative QOL; * Pregnancy or breast feeding; * Persons deprived of liberty or under guardianship (curatorship or tutorship) or incapable of giving consent; * Any psychological, familial, sociological or geographical condition potentially hampering compliance with the study protocol or follow-up scheduled.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Quality of life over the 12 months after surgeryAt 1, 4, 8, and 12 months of follow-upThe QLQ-C30 is a patient self-rating questionnaire (30 questions) that measures physical, role, social, emotional, and cognitive functions as well as overall QoL. Scores can be linearly transformed to provide a score from 0 to 100 REF. Higher scores represent better functioning on the functional scales and a higher level of symptoms of the symptom scales. The area under the quality of life curve will be measured over the 12 months after rectal surgery, with measurement time points at 1, 4, 8 and 12 months.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The PF, RF, CF, EF, SF, FA, PA, NV, QL Dimensions of the QLQ-C30 questionnaireAt 1, 4, 8 and 12 months after the rectal surgery1. 9 dimensions will be assessed with: * PF : Physical Functioning * RF : Role Functioning * CF : Cognitive Functioning * EF : Emotional Functioning * SF: Social Functioning * FA : Fatigue * PA : Pain * NV : Nausea and Vomiting * QL : Global health status 2- The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a questionnaire developed to assess the quality of life of cancer patients. This is a patients self-rating questionnaire that measures five functional scales (physical, role, social, emotional, and cognitive) three symptom scales (fatigue, pain, nausea and vomiting) A global health status / QoL scale, and a number of single items assessing additional symptoms commonly reported by cancer patients (dyspnea, loss of appetite, insomnia, constipation and diarrhea) and perceived financial impact of the disease. Scores can be linearly transformed to provide a score from 0 to 100 REF. Higher scores represent better functioning on the functional scales and a higher level of symptoms of the symptom scales.
The urinary frequencyAt 1, 4, 8, and 12 months post-surgeryThe QLQ-CR29 (Quality of life of rectal cancer patients with 29 questions) has five functional and 18 symptom scales. It contains four subscales (urinary frequency (UF), blood and mucus in stool (BMS), stool frequency (SF), and body image (BI)) and 19 single items. Urinary frequency is measured with items 1 and 2 of the questionnaire. The score can range from 0 to 100. Higher scores represent better functioning on the functional scales and a higher level of symptoms of the symptom scales.
Blood or mucus in stoolsAt 1, 4, 8, and 12 months post-surgeryThe QLQ-CR29 (Quality of life of rectal cancer patients with 29 questions) has five functional and 18 symptom scales. It contains four subscales (urinary frequency (UF), blood and mucus in stool (BMS), stool frequency (SF), and body image (BI)) and 19 single items. The blood or mucus in stools is measured with items 8 and 9 of the questionnaire. The score can range from 0 to 50. Higher scores represent better functioning on the functional scales and a higher level of symptoms of the symptom scales.
Stool frequencyAt 1, 4, 8, and 12 months post-surgery
Body image dimensions of the QLQ-CR29 questionnaireAt 1, 4, 8, and 12 months post-surgeryThe QLQ-CR29 (Quality of life of rectal cancer patients with 29 questions) has five functional and 18 symptom scales. Scores can be linearly transformed to provide a score from 0 to 100. Higher scores represent better functioning on the functional scales and a higher level of symptoms of the symptom scales.
Rate of defunctioning stomaAt 1 month after the rectal surgeryProportion of patients who have a defunctioning stoma. It will be assessed at the time of the consultation at 1 month with the collection of the adverse events (AE) and the serious adverse events (SAE)
Low Anterior Resection Syndrome score (LARS score)At 1, 4, 8 and 12 months after the rectal surgeryThe LARS questionnaire (low anterior resection score) evaluates bowel function. Five questions regarding incontinence for flatus and liquid stools, frequency, clustering and urgency for defecation are taken into account. The score ranges from 0 to 42 is divides into no LARS (0 to 20 points), minor LARS (21 to 29 points), and major LARS (30 to 42 points).
Anal Incontinence (Wexner score)At 1, 4, 8 and 12 months after the rectal surgeryThe WEXNER score assesses the importance of anal incontinence, it varies from 0 to 20, 20 corresponding to total anal incontinence
International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF)-5At 1, 4, 8 and 12 months after the rectal surgeryMeasured in male patients
Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) scale scoresAt 1, 4, 8 and 12 months after the rectal surgeryMeasured in female patients. The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) is a 19-item self-report inventory designed to assess female sexual function. It comprises six domains: desire, arousal ,lubrication orgasm, satisfaction, pain. The maximum score for each domain is 6.0, obtained by summing item responses and multiplying by a correction factor. The total composite sexual function score is a sum of domain scores and ranges from 2.0 (not sexually active and no desire) to 36.0.
Proportion of anastomotic leakageAt 1 and 4 months after the rectal surgeryProportion of patients with an anastomotic leakage will be assessed by a clinical exam (with a rectal examination) at 1 month and with a clinical exam (with a rectal examination) and a CT scan at 4 months after rectal surgery
Postoperative morbidity (Clavien-Dindo score I-IV)At 1 and 4 months after the rectal surgeryThis is a classification in order to rank a complication (surgical or medical morbidity) in an objective and reproducible manner. It consists of 7 grades (I, II, IIIa, IIIb, IVa, IVb and V). The introduction of the subclasses a and b allows a contraction of the classification into 5 grades (I, II, III, IV and V) depending on the size of the population observed or the of the focus of a study. It varies from 1 to 5, 5 corresponding to the death at the patient.
Postoperative mortality (Clavien-Dindo score V)At 1 and 4 months after the rectal surgeryThis is a classification in order to rank a complication (surgical or medical morbidity) in an objective and reproducible manner. It consists of 7 grades (I, II, IIIa, IIIb, IVa, IVb and V). The introduction of the subclasses a and b allows a contraction of the classification into 5 grades (I, II, III, IV and V) depending on the size of the population observed or the of the focus of a study. It varies from 1 to 5, 5 corresponding to the death at the patient.
Proportion to work return after TME in active workersThrough study completion, an average of 1 yearThis endpoint is referring to the capability of active patients to resume their professional activity after surgery. In order to better describe this endpoint the investigators want to measure together the proportion of patients resuming their activity, and the time until resumption of professional activity.
Time to work return after TME in active workersThrough study completion, an average of 1 yearThis endpoint is referring to the capability of active patients to resume their professional activity after surgery. In order to better describe this endpoint the investigators want to measure together the proportion of patients resuming their activity, and the time until resumption of professional activity.
Quality of life over the 12 months after surgeryQLQ-C30 is assessed at 1, 4, 8 and 12 months after the rectal surgeryThe Quality of life of cancer contains 30 questions (QLQ-C30). This is a patients self-rating questionnaire that measures physical, role, social, emotional, and cognitive functions as well as overall QoL. Scores can be linearly transformed to provide a score from 0 to 100.Higher scores represent better functioning on the functional scales and a higher level of symptoms of the symptom scales.
Incremental cost-utility ratio defined as an incremental cost / Quality-Adjsuted Life Year (QALY) gainedFrom surgery to 12 months after surgeryCosts will be measured through the French Health Data Hub database. QALYs will be measured using the and EQ-5D-5L questionnaire.
Total budgetary impact for French healthcare insurance system of spreading selective ostomy practice in FranceFrom surgery to 12 months after surgery5-year financial model
Indirect Costs (€) for French Healthcare insurance scheme of sickness leavesFrom surgery to 12 months after surgeryMeasured through SNDS database (Système National des Données de Santé) and data from our study on sickness leaves and times to return to work
Changes in microbiome composition and diversity from baseline to 1 monthFrom baseline to Month 1Data will be rarefied using the samples with the smallest number of reads and then subjected to alpha-diversity analysis employing Faith's phylogenetic diversity. Kruskal-Wallis will be calculated between all groups together and for pairwise comparisons. To find significant differences at the genera taxonomy level, ANCOM tests will be used to identify features that are differentially abundant across sample groups.
Urinary symptom profil (USP)At 1, 4, 8, 12 months after the rectal surgeryThe Urinary symptom profil (USP) assesses urinary symptoms among men and women with stress, urge (from 0 to 9), overactive bladder (from 0 to 9), or urinary obstructive symptoms (from 0 to 9). The maximum corresponding to a bad result.

Countries

France

Contacts

Primary ContactChristophe LAURENT
christophe.laurent@chu-bordeaux.fr(0)5 57 65 67 69
Backup ContactBenjamin FERNANDEZ
benjamin.fernandez@chu-bordeaux.fr

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026