Skip to content

Robotic Versus Hybrid Assisted Ventral Hernia Repair

Robotic Assisted vs. Laparoscopic Hybrid IPOM Ventral Hernia Repair: a Prospective Randomized Study Comparing Postoperative Outcomes

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05233020
Acronym
ROHYB
Enrollment
30
Registered
2022-02-10
Start date
2021-09-28
Completion date
2025-11-30
Last updated
2022-02-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pain, Quality of Life, Recurrence

Keywords

Ventral hernia, Laparoscopy, Robot-assisted, pain

Brief summary

Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair (LVHR) may be associated with chronic pain, seroma formation, bulging and failure to restore abdominal wall function. These outcomes are risk factors for hernia recurrence and poor quality of life (QoL). Our study evaluates whether robotic-assisted ventral hernia repair (rVHR) diminish these complications compared to LVHR with primary closure of the defect (hybrid).

Detailed description

Thirty patients undergoing incisional ventral hernia operation with fascial defect size from 3 to 6 cm will be recruited. Fifteen patients undergo rVHR and fifteen undergo hybrid operation.The main outcome measure is postoperative pain, evaluated with visual analogue scale (VAS: 0-10) preoperatively, at 1-week, at 1-month and at 1-year. Hernia recurrence will be evaluated with ultrasound examination at 1-year and QoL using the generic SF-36 short form questionnaire preoperatively, at 1-month and at 1-year.

Interventions

DEVICErobotic

fifteen patients undergo robotic operation

DEVICEhybrid

fifteen patients undergo hybrid operation

Sponsors

Kuopio University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* ventral hernia size 3-6 cm

Exclusion criteria

* previous ventral hernia

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Robotic-assisted ventral hernia repair vs hybrid. Change in pain1-yearVAS scale from 0 to 10. Zero in VAS is no pain and number ten is the highest possible pain

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Robotic-assisted ventral hernia repair vs hybrid. Change in the social functioning status.1-yearSF-36. Scale from 0 to 100. For all scales, higher scores (100) represent better function or outcome

Countries

Finland

Contacts

Primary ContactPirjo Käkelä, PhD
pirjo.kakela@kuh.fi044 717 4796
Backup ContactKirsi Mustonen, MD
kirsi.m.mustonen@kuh.fi044 717 5732

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026