Skip to content

Radifocus (Terumo) Versus Silverway (Asahi) to Deliver Catheters During Cardiac Catheterization

Radifocus (Terumo) Versus Silverway (Asahi) to Deliver Catheters During Cardiac Catheterization

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05231889
Acronym
RADVES
Enrollment
100
Registered
2022-02-09
Start date
2022-02-15
Completion date
2022-07-12
Last updated
2022-07-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anomalies Vascular

Keywords

Cardiac catheterization, Radifocus guide wire, Silverway guide wire

Brief summary

In some cases the standard J-tip guidewire cannot deliver the catheter into the aortic root, because of arterial loops or spasm. In these cases a hydrophilic guidewire (Terumo) gives the right lubricity and good shape retention to guide the catheter through the artery. However, the Terumo wire does not give much torque and could therefore easily penetrate side branches and cause dissection or perforation. The latest Silverway guidewire has some new advantages which is easier to guide and could cause less complications while faster delivery of catheters to the aortic valve. The investigators aim to compare both guide wires.

Detailed description

During cardiac catheterization a catheter is threaded through the radial arteries to the aortic root with the support of a guide wire. The standard workhorse to deliver the catheter is a J-tip guidewire (spring coil wire). However, in patients with arterial tortuosity or spasm, this guidewire has low lubricity and no torque to direct the catheter because the outer coil and core are not connected together. If this problem is encountered, interventional cardiologists will use a hydrophilic polymer-coated guide wire. Up to date there are several hydrophilic coated guide wires available. One of these is the Radifocus Guide Wire M (Terumo, Japan). Although it has better torque transmission than the spring wire, it still has low torque transmission due to a Nitinol core structure, is less supportive and can easily enter side branches because of the high lubricity and therefore might cause dissections or perforations. In some cases, coronary angioplasty guide wires are needed to negotiate a highly tortuous artery, but they lack the support to advance the catheter. Recently, the Silverway Guide Wire has been created (Asahi Intecc Co, LTD., Japan) to overcome the problems that a spring- and polymer wire have. Features that this new guide wire provide is hybrid coating and ACT ONE technology that connects the wire core and coil to ensure one to one torque transmission The investigators aim to compare both guide wires in deliverability, workability and complication rate.

Interventions

DEVICESilverway guidewire

The Silverway guidewire is a newly developed guidewire to overcome the problems the Radifocus guidewire has

DEVICERadifocus guidewire

The Radifocus guidewire is a hydrophilic coated guidewire that is used when a standard J-tip guidewire does not cross a vascular anomaly

Sponsors

Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Indication for radial artery access for diagnostic cardiac catheterization * Being able to receive the per standard protocol Verapamil and Nitroglycerin administration via radial artery * Not able to deliver a diagnostic or guiding catheter to the aortic root by means of the standard J tip wire * No signs of early complication after initial attempt with the J tip wire such as dissection, perforation or hematoma * Age ≥ 18 years

Exclusion criteria

* Femoral or brachial artery access * Patients with known CREST syndrome or other forms of scleroderma * Emergent indication for cardiac catheterization such as an acute coronary syndrome

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time in seconds from introduction to aortic rootDuring procedureMeasuring time from entering the guidewire in the catheter to delivery of the catheter to the aortic root (in seconds)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The ability of the study wire to deliver the catheter to the aortic rootDuring procedureIf the study wire is able to deliver the catheter to the aortic root
Change of access siteDuring procedureIs change of access site necessary?
Interventional cardiologists' survey of grading parameters working with the guide wireDirectly after procedure. Scale: not satisfactory (1) - somewhat satisfactory (2) - satisfactory (3)The interventional cardiologist who used the study wire must fill up a survey after procedure to grade the workability and deliverability of the study wire

Countries

Belgium

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026