Skip to content

Clinical Evaluation of Silver Nanoparticles in Comparison to Silver Diamine Fluoride in Management of Deep Carious Lesions

Clinical Evaluation of Silver Nanoparticles in Comparison to Silver Diamine Fluoride in Management of Deep Carious Lesions

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05231330
Enrollment
36
Registered
2022-02-09
Start date
2020-03-01
Completion date
2021-03-01
Last updated
2022-02-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Caries,Dental

Brief summary

this clinical study will be carried out to evaluate the effect of fluoride varnish with silver nanoparticles in comparison to silver diamine fluoride in management of deep carious lesions.

Interventions

DRUGsilvernanoparticles

silvernanoparticles in fluoride varnish

DRUGSDF

silver diamine fluoride

Sponsors

Suez Canal University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* success will be evaluated by: 1. Cold pulp testing: An ice-rod will be used for this test. Results should be positive or negative. 2. Absence of spontaneous pain: Post-operative pain will be assessed using the visual Analogue Scale Score (VAS), which is a measurement method for subjective characteristics of pain. Respondents specify their level of agreement to a statement by indicating a position along a 10 cm line between two end-points, with the term no sensitivity at one end and intolerable sensitivity at the other end. A score from (0 to 10 is given). 3. Sensitivity to percussion: (presence/ absence). 4. Inspection for Sinus/fistula/swelling: using visual inspection (presence/ absence). 5. Radiographic examination: Indicating presence of periapical radiolucencies, widening of lamina dura, internal and external root resorption (presence/ absence).

Exclusion criteria

* Patient-related criteria: * Medically compromised patients, who will not be able to attend multiple appointments or may require special management. * Pregnant women; as radiographs cannot be taken for them. * Allergy to any of the restorative materials, including anesthetics. * Uncooperative patients, will not abide by the instructions or attend the appointments. Tooth related criteria: * Retained deciduous teeth; as the study is targeting only permanent teeth. * Teeth with previous restorations, which may add another variable to the study (type of old restorative material, extent of recurrent caries. * Teeth with cervical caries; which can't be evaluated on periapical radiographs

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Cold pulp testing6 months: An ice-rod will be used for this test. Results should be positive or negative.
Absence of spontaneous pain6 monthPost-operative pain will be assessed using the visual Analogue Scale Score (VAS), which is a measurement method for subjective characteristics of pain. Respondents specify their level of agreement to a statement by indicating a position along a 10 cm line between two end-points, with the term no sensitivity at one end and intolerable sensitivity at the other end. A score from (0 to 10 is given).
Radiographic examination6 monthIndicating presence of periapical radiolucencies, widening of lamina dura, internal and external root resorption (presence/ absence).
sensitivity to percussion6 monthrecorded as yes or no
visual inspection for sinus/ fistula swelling6 monthrecorded as yes or no

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026