Skip to content

Tracking Atrial Fibrillation After Intensive Care Admission

Tracking Atrial Fibrillation After Intensive Care Admission

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05229211
Acronym
TrAFFIC
Enrollment
100
Registered
2022-02-08
Start date
2022-02-01
Completion date
2025-12-30
Last updated
2024-06-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Atrial Fibrillation New Onset, New Onset Atrial Fibrillation, Atrial Fibrillation

Keywords

Critical illness, Intensive care, Atrial fibrillation, Outcomes

Brief summary

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a heart problem that causes an irregular heartbeat. It can cause the heart to beat more rapidly and reduce the heart's ability to pump blood around the body efficiently, causing heart failure. It also increases the risk of blood clots forming inside the heart. These clots may then be pumped out of the heart, through the blood vessels, to other parts of the body. This can cause strokes if the clots spread to the brain. AF is a common problem outside an Intensive Care Unit (ICU), where treatment is based on good, evidence-based guidelines designed to reduce the risk of problems like heart failure or strokes. Around 10% of patients treated in ICU develop atrial fibrillation as a complication of their underlying illness. Some patients will recover their normal heart rhythm before leaving the ICU, often with the help of some medical treatments. It is not known whether these patients will get AF again after leaving the ICU, or when this is likely to happen. It is also unknown whether patients who avoid AF whilst on the ICU may still be at high risk of developing it after they leave. This study will identify patients on the ICU who have no previous record of atrial fibrillation. These patients will be monitored whilst on the ICU to identify those who develop AF. Those patients who develop new onset AF will be monitored on the ward after leaving the ICU to see which patients have AF at this point. The heart monitoring will be repeated once the patients leave hospital, again to identify whether they have atrial fibrillation. Some studies suggest that AF during critical illness causes a long-term risk of recurrent AF and AF associated complications such as heart failure, stroke, and death. To understand how to minimise these risks in intensive care patients, we need to know how which patients who develop atrial fibrillation whilst in an ICU go on to have recurrent atrial fibrillation in hospital and in the community. These patients may benefit from interventions to reduce long term adverse events such as anticoagulation to reduce stroke risk.

Detailed description

The study aims to determine whether it is feasible to screen patients to detect atrial fibrillation after treatment on an intensive care unit. Patients who develop new onset AF in ICU who have no history of atrial fibrillation prior to ICU admission will be included. These patients will be monitored for atrial fibrillation on the ward post ICU discharge (for 14 days or until hospital discharge), and then again at 3 months post hospital discharge (for 7 days), when they attend the routine post ICU follow up clinic. In the ICU, this study cohort of patients will be monitored continuously to detect atrial fibrillation. If atrial fibrillation is suspected, this will be confirmed by independent review of a 12-lead ECG. On the ward, post ICU discharge patients will be given a chest patch for continuous cardiac rhythm monitoring designed to detect arrhythmia, which they will wear for 7 days, before a second patch is used for a further 7 days or until hospital discharge, whichever is shortest in duration. Data relating to past medical history, history of illness requiring ICU admission, subsequent events post ICU discharge and complications post-hospital discharge including hospital readmissions will be collected via hospital records and by patient interview at the follow up clinic. Patients will attend the ICU follow up clinic at 3 months post hospital discharge. At this time, they will be provided with a new chest patch from the same manufacturer, which they will wear for 7 days. The primary aim will be to demonstrate the feasibility of monitoring patients for AF occurrence post ICU discharge using a wearable patch device. Secondary aims will be to identify the proportion of patients who develop NOAF (New onset atrial fibrillation) in ICU who go on to have AF post discharge, as well as documenting the stroke risk, mortality and length of hospital stay in this patient group. This study will guide the design of a larger study investigating AF occurrence and stroke risk in patients post ICU discharge. Exploratory objectives include to validate a newly designed AF detection algorithm. Objective 1: Validation of a new state-of-the-art machine learning algorithm against the manufactured-approved AF detection algorithm and three best-in-class algorithms. Objective 2: Identify subgroups of patients that are at increased risk of adverse outcomes of new onset atrial fibrillation in ICU compared to those who are not.

Interventions

Continuous ECG monitoring via VitalConnect patch worn on the chest.

Sponsors

University of Oxford
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_ONLY
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
16 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

* Willing and able to give informed consent for participation in the study, or favourable consultee advice for adults lacking capacity * Male or Female, * aged 16 years or above. * Admitted to intensive care for \>24 hours * New onset atrial fibrillation as confirmed by 12 lead ECG-

Exclusion criteria

* History of atrial fibrillation * Unable to undergo cardiac monitoring * Previously included in the study * Not anticipated by treating consultant to survive to ICU discharge (withdrawal or limitation of medical treatment at time of screening) * Contraindication to anticoagulation * Unable to wear the device for the prescribed monitoring period * Implanted neurostimulator, as this may disrupt the ECG recording

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Proportion of patients who are compliant with the study protocol3 months post hospital discharge
Proportion of patients lost to follow up3 months post hospital discharge
Proportion of eligible patients who are willing to participate in the study3 months post hospital discharge

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Proportion of patients who develop NOAF in ICU who develop stroke or TIA post ICU discharge14 days post ICU discharge
Proportion of patients who develop NOAF in ICU who develop stroke or TIA post hospital discharge3 months post hospital discharge
Difference in hospital length of stay in patients who develop atrial fibrillation after ICU discharge compared to patients who do not.Follow up patient appointment at 3 months post hospital discharge.To compare patients who develop NOAF in ICU and have recurrent AF in hospital with those who do not have recurrent AF in hospital
Difference in mortality in patients who develop atrial fibrillation after ICU discharge compared to those who do not.From ICU discharge to follow up patient appointment at 3 months post hospital discharge.To compare patients who develop NOAF in ICU and have recurrent AF in hospital and/or post hospital discharge with those who do not have recurrent AF.
Proportion of patients who develop NOAF in ICU who develop bleeding complications post ICU discharge.From ICU discharge to 14 days post ICU dischargeMajor and minor bleeding episodes as defined by the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis Criteria.
Proportion of patients who develop NOAF in ICU who develop bleeding complications post hospital discharge.3 months post hospital dischargeMajor and minor bleeding episodes as defined by the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis Criteria.
Difference in number of ICU readmissions in patients who develop atrial fibrillation after ICU discharge compared to those who do not.Follow up patient appointment at 3 months post hospital discharge.To compare patients who develop NOAF in ICU and have recurrent AF in hospital with those who do not have recurrent AF in hospital
Proportion of patients who are in AF at 3 months post hospital discharge3 months post hospital discharge
Proportion of patients who are in AF post ICU discharge in hospital.14 days post ICU hospital discharge

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Proportion of AF episodes detected compared to a. Validated CE marked algorithm b. Compared to 3 best-in-class algorithms3 months post hospital discharge
Identify subgroups of patients that are at increased risk of adverse outcomes of new onset atrial fibrillation in ICU compared to those who are not.At completion of study at 3 months post hospital discharge.Perform subgroup analysis of results in both study groups, adverse outcomes defined as stroke, TIA, bleeding complications

Countries

United Kingdom

Contacts

Primary ContactPeter Watkinson, MD.
ccrg.research@ndcn.ox.ac.uk@ndcn.ox.ac.uk01865231448
Backup ContactRachel Henning
ccrg.research@ndcn.ox.ac.uk01865231448

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026