Skip to content

Mobile Food Record on Recall Effects

Use of a Mobile Food Record, Enhanced by a Novel Artificial Intelligence-Based Informatics Framework to Expand Capture of Dietary Intake

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05228171
Enrollment
10
Registered
2022-02-08
Start date
2022-03-14
Completion date
2023-12-31
Last updated
2024-02-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Healthy

Keywords

Mobile food record, nutrition

Brief summary

Human dietary habits remain challenging to measure. Even the gold-standard interviewer-administered 24 hour dietary recall has established underreporting issues especially in high-risk populations, such as patients with obesity. Performance of precision nutrition research requires state of the art tools to capture individual dietary patterns. Given the widespread availability of smart phones, mobile-phone based food records present a prime opportunity to capture in the field dietary intake. Mobile food records, however, are not yet widely used in nutrition research. Several reasons exist. First, the mobile food record needs to be validated relative to the gold standard of dietary intake, the 24-hour dietary recall. Second, many available mobile food records are commercially based, with caveats about data availability and meeting research-quality data security practices (HIPAA compliance). In response, this study includes using a freely available, research-focused, HIPAA compliant, mobile food record (mCC: my Circadian Clock app) actively used in research studies (including our own ongoing work) to test the hypothesis that a mobile food record can expand capture of dietary intake. The proposed aims include the following: Using a randomized, cross-over design, evaluation of augmenting interviewer-administered 24-hour dietary recalls by a mobile food record (Augmented Recall) results in less energy intake underreporting than a standard (un-augmented) interviewer administered 24-hour dietary recall (Standard Recall).

Interventions

BEHAVIORALmCC app

Interviewer use of the mCC app during the 24-hour dietary recall interview.

Sponsors

University of Minnesota
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_CROSSOVER
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Adults between 18-65 years old * BMI ≥30 kg/m2 * Without a 4 year (BS/BA) college degree * Owns a smart phone * Able to read and speak English

Exclusion criteria

• Pregnant or lactating women

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Caloric intake60 days from interventionCompare caloric intake assessed by the augmented recall relative to the standardized recall

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Energy intake24 hours following food intakeComparison of the energy intake calculated from the 24 hour interviewer administered dietary recall which is augmented by concurrent use and review of a mobile food record (Augmented Recall) vs the energy intake calculated from standard interviewer administered 24-hour dietary recall (Standard Recall)

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026