Skip to content

BIOlogics in Severe Nasal POlyposis SurvEy

Real Life Assessment of Biologics Efficacy in Severe Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05228041
Acronym
BIOPOSE
Enrollment
100
Registered
2022-02-08
Start date
2022-02-10
Completion date
2027-07-01
Last updated
2026-04-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps

Keywords

Biologic, nasal polyp, chronic rhinosinusitis, eosinophil, endotype

Brief summary

With a prevalence of 2-4% in western countries, Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps (CRSwNP) is of major concern regarding its substantial impact on the social and physical quality of life. So far, endoscopic sinus surgery remains the treatment of choice when the first line of medical treatment with corticosteroid has failed. During the last 15 years, several studies have shown that CRSwNP is associated with a T helper 2 (T2) immune response leading to B cell release of IgE, mucosal recruitment of eosinophils from bone marrow via Interleukin (IL)-5, IL-4 and IL-13 mediated chemoattractant production. New biologic agents capable of blocking T2 cytokines have been developed in the field of eosinophil-associated diseases, shifting the paradigm of treatment for patients with CRSwNP. In the near future, endotype profiling with accurate biomarkers will be mandatory to tailor the treatment of nasal polyposis with specific biologic therapies. Herein the investigators propose a prospective study monitoring medical records of CRSwNP patients who undergo biologic treatments. The objectives are to assess treatment efficacy on quality of life, to report clinical and biological criteria for prescription and to measure tolerance and compliance.

Detailed description

New biologic agents capable of blocking T2 cytokines have been developed in the field of eosinophil-associated diseases, shifting the paradigm of treatment for patients with CRSwNP. In the near future, endotype profiling with accurate biomarkers will be mandatory to tailor the treatment of nasal polyposis with specific biologic therapies. Herein the investigators propose a prospective study monitoring medical records of CRSwNP patients who undergo biologic treatments. The objectives are to assess treatment efficacy on quality of life, to report clinical and biological criteria for prescription and to measure tolerance and compliance.

Interventions

DRUGBiologic treatments available in CRSwNP (dupilumab, mepolizumab and benralizumab according to their marketing approval)

Drug prescription according to their marketing approval (subcutaneously, every month or every two weeks)

Sponsors

University Hospital, Lille
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients of over 18-year old requiring a biologic treatment for CRswNP in accordance with its marketing approval

Exclusion criteria

* Oral corticotherapy in the previous month; * Biologic treatment with anti-IgE (omalizumab), anti-IL-5/IL-5R (mepolizumab, benralizumab) or anti-IL-4/IL-13R (dupilumab) or any other biotherapy for inflammatory diseases in the previous 6 months apart from ongoing biotherapies for severe asthma; * Hypersensitivity to humanized antibodies ; * Documented SARS-Cov2 infection in the last 3 months with persistent olfactory disorders related to COVID; * Pregnant or breast-feeding women; * Patient without social coverage

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
6-month rate of patients with a SNOT-22 (Sinonasal Outcome test -22) score change over the minimal clinically important difference of 8.9 by comparison of SNOT-22 scores measured at Month 0 and Month 6Day0, Month 6from 0 to 110 , 110 = worst outcome

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
SNOT 22 (Sinonasal Outcome Test-22) scoresDay 0, Month 3, Month 6, Month 12 and Month 18from 0 to 110 , 110 = worst outcome
Visual analogical scale (VAS) for nasal obstructionDay 0, Month 3, Month 6, Month 12 and Month 18from 0 to 10, 10 = worst outcome
Visual analogical scale (VAS) for smell lostDay 0, Month 3, Month 6, Month 12 and Month 18from 0 to 10, 10 = worst outcome
Visual analogical scale (VAS) for rhinorrheaDay 0, Month 3, Month 6, Month 12 and Month 18from 0 to 10, 10 = worst outcome
Visual analogical scale (VAS) for craniofacial painDay 0, Month 3, Month 6, Month 12 and Month 18from 0 to 10, 10 = worst outcome
Number of systemic corticosteroid treatment courses between each visitDay 0, Month 3, Month 6, Month 12 and Month 18number of treatment sequencies
Delay to first surgical procedureDay 0, Month 3, Month 6, Month 12 and Month 18time between biologic onset and need for surgery
Blood eosinophil countDay 0, Month 3, Month 6, Month 12 and Month 18number of cells per mm3
Blood total IgE concentrationsDay 0, Month 3, Month 6, Month 12 and Month 18concentration expressed by KUI/L

Countries

France

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORGeoffrey Mortuaire, MD

University Hospital, Lille

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 30, 2026