Skip to content

Failed Endometrial Ablation Treatment With Implantable Progesterone (FEAT) Study

Failed Endometrial Ablation Treatment With Implantable Progesterone (FEAT) Study

Status
Withdrawn
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05227456
Acronym
FEATS
Enrollment
0
Registered
2022-02-07
Start date
2022-07-01
Completion date
2024-04-30
Last updated
2025-11-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Abnormal Uterine Bleeding, Dysmenorrhea

Keywords

abnormal uterine bleeding, pain, dysmenorrhea, endometrial ablation

Brief summary

The objective of this study is to assess the efficacy of an implantable etonogestrel device in reducing hysterectomy rate in patients with a failed endometrial ablation.

Detailed description

The researchers aim to determine whether use of etonogestrel implant in patients with failed endometrial ablation significantly decreases hysterectomy rate. Changes in pelvic pain and vaginal bleeding will be assessed. Time to hysterectomy will be examined. The researchers hypothesize that treatment of failed endometrial ablation with etonogestrel implant will decrease pelvic pain and vaginal bleeding resulting in a significantly decreased need for hysterectomy.

Interventions

Implant will be inserted

Sponsors

University of Saskatchewan
CollaboratorOTHER
Saskatchewan Health Authority - Regina Area
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Previous endometrial ablation * Pelvic pain and/or vaginal bleeding seeking treatment

Exclusion criteria

* Previous or current VTE * Liver tumour, benign or malignant, or active liver disease * Undiagnosed abnormal genital bleeding * Known or suspected breast cancer * Uncontrolled hypertension * Allergy to component of etonogestrel implant * Lack of patient consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
HysterectomyOccurrence of hysterectomy will be documented any time during the 3 year follow up periodoccurrence of hysterectomy

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pelvic PainVAS will be documented at baseline and 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, and 36 monthsAssessment of pelvic pain using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), minimum score = 0, maximum score = 10, higher score indicates more pain
Time to HysterectomyTime of hysterectomy will be documented any time during the 3 year follow up periodTime from booking of hysterectomy to actual hysterectomy will be documented
Vaginal bleedingPBAC score will be documented at baseline and 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, and 36 monthsPictorial Blood Loss Assessment Chart (PBAC) score, minimum score = 0mL, maximum score = n/a, higher score indicates higher menstrual blood loss

Countries

Canada

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026