Skip to content

Buffered vs. Unbuffered Local Anesthesia in Mandibular Molars Diagnosed With Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis

Buffered vs. Unbuffered Local Anesthesia in Mandibular Molars Diagnosed With Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis: A Controlled, Randomized Double-blind Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05227300
Enrollment
40
Registered
2022-02-07
Start date
2022-02-14
Completion date
2022-06-30
Last updated
2024-05-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis

Keywords

lidocaine, buffered, local anesthetic, irreversible pulpitis

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether one type of anesthetic (numbing medicine) will work better at numbing the nerve in a tooth than using a different type of anesthetic. A second purpose is to see if the time needed to numb the nerve in a tooth is different between the two anesthetics.

Detailed description

40 subjects with a mandibular molar diagnosed with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis will be randomly allocated into 2 groups. One group will receive a total of 3 cartridges of a standard, unbuffered 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine via inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) followed by supplemental buccal and lingual infiltrations, while the other will receive the equivalent yet buffered formulation. An electronic pulp tester (EPT) will be used to objectively determine baseline pulpal status of the affected tooth, followed by 2-minute interval testing following the administration of all local anesthesia. The onset of pulpal anesthesia is defined by the first of 2 consecutive EPT=80 readings, and the endodontic treatment may begin. Profound pulpal anesthesia is ultimately determined if the patients report a comfortable pulpotomy as reflected on the Wong-Baker FACES Visual Analog Scale.

Interventions

DRUGOnset Sodium Bicarbonate Inj., 8.4%, USP Neutralizing Additive Solution

Onpharma's Onset sodium bicarbonate buffer to be added to a standard cartridge of dental local anesthetic

Septodont's standard formulation of 2% lidocaine with epinephrine

Sponsors

Indiana University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Masking description

A statistician will provide a two-product randomization scheme which will randomize each of the 40 subjects on the order of their entry into the study. The research assistants will be aware of and document this scheme, but the student researcher/PI will not know what type of anesthetic will be administered.

Intervention model description

This study will be a single-center, controlled, randomized, double-blind (provider and subject), 2 treatment, 1 period, parallel study

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

- In order to participate, subjects must: * Be between the ages of 18 and 80 years old * Have the ability and willingness to independently consent to treatment and study participation * Have an uncomplicated medical history (ASA I and II) * Not be pregnant * Have no allergies local anesthetics/sulfites (confirmed or self-reported) * Not be taking any medications that may affect the proper assessment of the anesthetic (no acetaminophen or short-acting NSAIDs such as ibuprofen within the previous 6 hours; no long-acting NSAIDs such as naproxen within the previous 16 hours) * Not require nitrous oxide during treatment, and the injection area should appear healthy with no other pre-existing conditions or infections that may compromise an accurate collection of data * Be experiencing signs of irreversible pulpitis (an exaggerated response to cold that lingers longer than 10 seconds) in a mandibular molar at the time of conducting the study

Exclusion criteria

- No subjects will have: * A negative response to cold in the proposed treatment tooth * A radiographic periradicular pathosis more advanced than a widened periodontal ligament or have an intraoral swelling

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
VAS Scores as Measures of Profoundness of Pulpal AnesthesiaUp to 20 minutes post-drug administrationThe mean Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score, which ranges from a min of 1 to a max of 10. In other words, inadequate anesthesia is considered to be a VAS score that is between 4 and 10 because that is not considered to be comfortable and profound.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Onset of Pulpal AnesthesiaUp to 20 minutes post-drug administrationDuration of time in minutes required to achieve pulpal anesthesia, defined as an electrical pulp test score of 80 (which is the maximum stimulation). Any EPT score between 1-79 after 20 minutes post-anesthesia is considered a failure of pulpal anesthesia.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Buffered 2% Lidocaine With 1:100,000 Epinephrine
Buffered local anesthetic (addition of sodium bicarbonate to make a 10% buffered solution) Onset Sodium Bicarbonate Inj., 8.4%, USP Neutralizing Additive Solution: Onpharma's Onset sodium bicarbonate buffer to be added to a standard cartridge of dental local anesthetic 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine: Septodont's standard formulation of 2% lidocaine with epinephrine
20
Unbuffered 2% Lidocaine With 1:100,000 Epinephrine
Standard local anesthetic 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine: Septodont's standard formulation of 2% lidocaine with epinephrine
20
Total40

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicBuffered 2% Lidocaine With 1:100,000 EpinephrineUnbuffered 2% Lidocaine With 1:100,000 EpinephrineTotal
Age, Continuous41.2 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.5
38 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.4
39.6 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.6
Initial Electronic Pulp Test (EPT) less than 80 shows vital pulp (min stimulation is 1, max is 80)42.9 Units on a scale47.3 Units on a scale45.1 Units on a scale
Initial Visual Analog Scale (VAS) w/ a min score of 1 and max score of 10 (a 4+ is significant pain)7.8 Units on a Scale6.9 Units on a Scale7.35 Units on a Scale
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
20 participants20 participants40 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
15 Participants8 Participants23 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
5 Participants12 Participants17 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 200 / 20
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 200 / 20
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 200 / 20

Outcome results

Primary

VAS Scores as Measures of Profoundness of Pulpal Anesthesia

The mean Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score, which ranges from a min of 1 to a max of 10. In other words, inadequate anesthesia is considered to be a VAS score that is between 4 and 10 because that is not considered to be comfortable and profound.

Time frame: Up to 20 minutes post-drug administration

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Buffered 2% Lidocaine With 1:100,000 EpinephrineVAS Scores as Measures of Profoundness of Pulpal Anesthesia3.1 Score on a scale
Unbuffered 2% Lidocaine With 1:100,000 EpinephrineVAS Scores as Measures of Profoundness of Pulpal Anesthesia1.2 Score on a scale
Secondary

Onset of Pulpal Anesthesia

Duration of time in minutes required to achieve pulpal anesthesia, defined as an electrical pulp test score of 80 (which is the maximum stimulation). Any EPT score between 1-79 after 20 minutes post-anesthesia is considered a failure of pulpal anesthesia.

Time frame: Up to 20 minutes post-drug administration

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Buffered 2% Lidocaine With 1:100,000 EpinephrineOnset of Pulpal Anesthesia8.4 Minutes
Unbuffered 2% Lidocaine With 1:100,000 EpinephrineOnset of Pulpal Anesthesia8.8 Minutes

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026