Skip to content

Stroke Process in FEmoral Versus Radial Access

Stroke Process in FEmoral Versus Radial Access

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05225636
Acronym
SFERA
Enrollment
100
Registered
2022-02-04
Start date
2021-09-15
Completion date
2023-04-28
Last updated
2022-02-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Ischemic Stroke, Acute

Keywords

Radial access, Femoral access, Thrombectomy

Brief summary

In patients with suspected acute stroke due to large vessel occlusion with indication for endovascular treatment, radial access is just as safe, fast, and effective as femoral access, and it improves the entire stroke treatment process.

Detailed description

Investigators will compare the procedure times, angiographic results as well as the clinical evolution and the patient's experience during their hospital stay and after discharge, depending on the arterial access practiced for mechanical thrombectomy.

Interventions

PROCEDUREthrombectomy

Extraction of intracranial thrombus in an acute large vessel occlusion

Sponsors

Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron Research Institute
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Randomized, prospective clinical trial, under conditions of routine, open-label clinical practice, with the main objective evaluated by an independent investigator who was not blinded to the treatment received. The study will be single-center.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with high suspicion of ischemic stroke due to large cerebral vessel occlusion defined by NIHSS\> 10. * Immediate availability of the entire team responsible for endovascular treatment (Neurologist, Neurointerventional physician, Anesthetist, Nursing, Technicians ...) * Radial artery diameter ≥2.5 mm * Presence of femoral pulse or patency by ultrasonography in its defect. * Previous functional independence (mRS 0-2).

Exclusion criteria

* Life expectancy of less than 6 months. * Intracranial hemorrhage * Patients with pre-existing neurological or psychiatric pathology that may confuse future evaluations. * No availability for follow-up after 90 days.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
No inferiority of radial access in the recanalization rateImmediate after treatmentTo demonstrate the non-inferiority of radial access with respect to femoral access in the recanalization rate (% mTICI 2b-3 in 3 or fewer passes) obtained in patients with large vessel occlusion treated by mechanical thrombectomy.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Grades of modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction24 hoursGrade of recanalization after first pass, third pass and at the end of the procedure
Change of artery access24 hoursRate of need to change from radial to femoral access and from femoral to radial access
Patient Reported Outcomes5 daysPROMS Patient Reported Outcomes Measures
No differences in complications in vascular access24 hoursComparison in frequency of access vessel occlusion, bleeding or presence of pseudoaneurysm
Degree of disability/dependence after a stroke24 hours and at 90 daysmodified rankin scale (from 0 to 6, being 0 best and 6 worst)
Times during hospitalizationAt 24 hours and during first 5 daysBeginning of sitting, ambulation, rehabilitation and total time of hospital admission, need for urinary catheter
Patient experience5 daysPREMS Patient Reported Experience Measures

Countries

Spain

Contacts

Primary ContactDAVID HERNANDEZ, MD
dhm050780@gmail.com+34934893000
Backup ContactDAVID HERNANDEZ, MD
david.hernandez.idi@gencat.cat+34636965667

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 7, 2026